Telling more than they can know? Does the most important issue really reveal what is most important to voters?

Electoral Studies

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 679-688

  Bartle, John ^a   Laycock, Samantha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

British Election Study; Issue importance; Issue voting; Most important issue; Self reports

Indexed keywords

ELECTION; ELECTORAL GEOGRAPHY; ELECTORAL SYSTEM; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

UNITED KINGDOM;

IXODIDA;

EID: 84867097589     PISSN: 02613794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aldrich J., Nelson F.D. Linear Probability, Logit and Probit Models 1984, Sage Publications, London.
2. Allen N.J. Labour's third term: a tale of two prime ministers. Britain at the Polls 2010 2011, Sage Publications, London. N. Allen, J. Bartle (Eds.).
3. Alvarez R.M., Brehm J. Hard Choices, Easy Answers: Values, Information and American Public Opinion 2002, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J.
4. Bartels L.M. Instrumental and 'quasi-instrumental' variables. American Journal of Political Science 1991, 35:777-800.
5. Bartle J. Why Labour won - again. Britain at the Polls, 2001 2002, Chatham House Publishers, Chatham, N. J. A. King (Ed.).
6. Bartle J. Partisanship, performance and personality: competing and complementary characterizations of the 2001 British general election. Party Politics 2003, 9:317-345.
7. Bartle J. Homogenous models and heterogeneous voters. Political Studies 2005, 53:653-675.
8. Baumgartner F.R., Jones B.D. Agendas and Instability in American Politics 1993, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Blais A., Martin P., Nadeau R. Can people explain their own vote? Introspective questions as indicators of salience in the 1995 Quebec referendum on sovereignty. Quality and Quantity 1998, 32:355-366.
10. Brady H. The perils of survey research: inter-personally incomparable responses. Political Methodology 1985, 11:269-291.
11. Brody R.A., Page B.I. Comment: the assessment of policy voting. American Political Science Review 1972, 66:450-458.
12. Butler D., Stokes D. Political Change in Britain: the Evolution of Political Preference 1974, Macmillan, London.
13. Campbell A., Converse P.E., Miller W.E., Stokes D.E. The American Voter 1960, Wiley, New York.
14. Carmines E.G., Zeller R.A. Reliability and Validity Assessment 1994, Sage Publications, London.
15. Chambers Chambers Dictionary 2003, Book Club Associates, London.
16. Clarke H.D., Sanders D., Stewart M.C., Whiteley P.F. Political Choice in Britain 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
17. Clarke H.D., Sanders D., Stewart M.C., Whiteley P.F. Performance Politics and the British Voter 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Clarke H.D., Sanders D., Stewart M.C., Whiteley P.F. Valence politics and electoral choice in Britain, 2010. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties 2011, 21:237-253.
19. Converse P.E. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Ideology and Discontent 1964, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. D.E. Apter (Ed.).
20. Converse P.E. Popular representation and the distribution of information. Information and Democratic Processes 1990, University of Illinois Press, Chicago. J.A. Ferejohn, J.H. Kuklinski (Eds.).
21. Converse P.E. Foreword. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences 1995, xi-xvii. Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, Mawah, NY. J.A. Krosnick, R.E. Petty (Eds.).
22. Crewe I. Now relax, it's a dead cert. New Statesman and Society 12 February 2001.
23. Denk C.E., Finkel S.E. The aggregate impact of explanatory variables in logit and linear probability models. American Journal of Political Science 1992, 36:785-804.
24. Dunleavy P. Political behaviour, institutional and experiential approaches. A New Handbook of Political Science 1998, Oxford University Press, Oxford. R.E. Goodin, H.D. Klingemann (Eds.).
25. Evans G. On the validation of measures of strategic motivations: a critical comment on Alvarez and Nagler. British Journal of Political Science 2002, 32:185-188.
26. Evans G., Heath A. A tactical error in the analysis of tactical voting: a response to Niemi, Whitten and Franklin. British Journal of Political Science 1993, 23:131-137.
27. Fiorina M.P. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections 1981, Yale University Press, New Haven.
28. Friedrich R.J. In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science 1982, 26:797-833.
29. Gelman A., King G. Why are American presidential election campaign polls so variable when votes are so predictable?. British Journal of Political Science 1993, 23:409-451.
30. Goren P. Political expertise and issue voting in presidential elections. Political Research Quarterly 1997, 50:387-412.
31. Green J., Hobolt S.B. Owning the issue agenda: party strategies and vote choices in British elections. Electoral Studies 2008, 27:460-476.
32. Heath A., Evans G. Tactical voting: concepts, measurement and findings. British Journal of Political Science 1994, 24:557-561.
33. Jaccard J. Interaction Effects in Logistic Regression 2001, Sage Publications, London.
34. Jennings W., Wlezien C. Distinguishing between most important problems and issues?. Public Opinion Quarterly 2011, 75:545-555.
35. Jennings W. The public thermostat, political responsiveness and error-correction: border control and asylum in Britain, 1994-2007. British Journal of Political Science 2009, 39:847-870.
36. Jones B.D., Baumgartner F.R. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems 2005, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
37. King A. Why Labour won - at last. New Labour Triumphs: Britain at the Polls, 1997 1998, CQ Press, Washington. A. King (Ed.).
38. King G., Keohane R., Verba S. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J.
39. Krosnick J.A. Americans perceptions of presidential candidates: a test of the projection hypothesis. Journal of Social Issues 1988, 46:159-182.
40. Krosnick J.A. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1991, 5:213-236.
41. Lee T. The sovereign status of survey data. Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy and the Future of American Democracy 2002, Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Manza, F.L. Cook, B.I. Page (Eds.).
42. McClure J. Telling more than they can know: the positivist account of verbal reports and mental processes. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 1983, 13:111-128.
43. Miller W.E. Political behaviour, old and new. A New Handbook of Political Science 1998, Oxford University Press, Oxford. R.E. Goodin, H.D. Klingemann (Eds.).
44. Miller W.E., Shanks J.M. The New American Voter 1996, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
45. Mondak J.J. Developing valid knowledge scales. American Journal of Political Science 2001, 45:224-238.
46. Murr A.E. Wisdom of crowds? A decentralised election forecasting model that uses citizens local expectations. Electoral Studies 2011, 30:771-783.
47. Niemi R., Bartels L.M. New measures of issue salience: an evaluation. Journal of Politics 1985, 47:1212-1220.
48. Nisbett R., Wilson T. Telling more than we can know? Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 1977, 84:231-259.
49. Petty R.E., Krosnick J.A. Attitude strength: an overview. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences 1995, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mawah, N.J. J. Petty, J. Krosnick (Eds.).
50. Rabinowitz G., Macdonald S.E. A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review 1989, 83:93-121.
51. Repass D.E. Issue salience and party choice. American Political Science Review 1971, 65:389-400.
52. Rich M.C. Verbal reports on mental processes: issues of accuracy and awareness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 1979, 9:29-37.
53. Rivers D. Heterogeneity in models of electoral choice. American Journal of Political Science 1988, 32:737-757.
54. Sanders D., Clarke H.D., Stewart M.C., Whiteley P.F. Downs, stokes and the dynamics of electoral choice. British Journal of Political Science 2011, 41:287-314.
55. Shanks J.M. Unresolved issues in electoral decisions: alternative perspectives on the explanation of individual choice. Elections at Home and Abroad 1994, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. M.K. Jennings, T.E. Mann (Eds.).
56. Shanks J.M., Miller W.E. Policy direction and performance evaluation: complementary explanations of the Reagan elections. British Journal of Political Science 1990, 20:142-235.
57. Smith E.R., Miller F.D. Limits on perception and cognitive processes: a reply to Nisbett and Wilson. Psychological Review 1978, 85:355-362.
58. Stokes D.E. Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review 1963, 57:368-377.
59. Surowiecki J. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few 2004, Abacus, London.
60. Turner C.K. Don't blame memory for people's faulty reports of what influences their judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1988, 14:622-629.
61. White P. Limitations on verbal reports on internal events: a refutation of Nisbett and Wilson and Bem. Psychological Review 1980, 87:105-112.
62. Wilson T.D., Stone J.I. Limitations of self-knowledge: more on telling more than we can know. Review of Personality and Social Psychology 1985, vol. 6. Sage Publications.
63. Wilson T.D. Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious 2002, Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
64. Wilson T.D., Dunn E.W. Self-knowledge: its limits, value, and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 55:493-518.
65. Wlezien C. On the salience of political issues: the problem with most important problem. Electoral Studies 2005, 24:555-579.
66. Zaller J.R. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinions 1992, Cambridge University Press, New York.