Homogeneous models and heterogeneous voters

Political Studies

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 653-675

  Bartle, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28444444880     PISSN: 00323217     EISSN: 14679248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00550.x     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Andersen, R., Heath, A., and Sinnott, R. (2002) 'Political Knowledge and Electoral Choice' in L. Bennie, C. Railings, J. Tonge and P. Webb (eds), British Elections and Parties Review. London: Frank Cass, pp. 1-22.
2. Andersen, R. and Evans, G. (2003) 'Who Blairs Wins? Leadership and Voting in the 2001 Election', in C. Railings, R. Scully, J. Tonge and P. Webb (eds), British Elections & Parties Review, Volume 13. London: Frank Cass, pp. 229-47.
3. Bartels, L. M. (2000) 'Panel Effects in the American National Election Studies', Political Analysis, 8 (1), 1-20.
4. Bartle, J. (1997) 'Political Awareness and Heterogeneity in Models of Voting Choice: Some Evidence from the British Election Studies', in C. Pattie, D. Denver, J. Fisher and S. Ludlam (eds), British Elections and Parties Review, Volume 7. London: Frank Cass, pp. 1-22.
5. Bartle, J. (2000) 'Political Awareness, Opinion Constraint and the Stability of Ideological Positions', Political Studies, 48 (3), 467-84.
6. Bartle, J. (2003a) 'Partisanship, Performance and Personality: Competing and Complementary Characterisations of the 2001 British General Election', Party Politics, 9 (3), 317-45.
7. Bartle, J (2003b) 'Focus Groups and Measures of Party Identification: An Exploratory Study', Electoral Studies, 22 (2), 217-37.
8. Bartle, J. and Crewe, I. (2002) 'The Impact of Party Leaders in Britain: Strong Assumptions, Weak Evidence', in A. King (ed.), Leaders' Personalities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 70-95.
9. Bean, C. and Mughan, A. (1989) 'Leadership Effects in Parliamentary Elections in Australia and Britain', American Political Science Review, 83 (4), 1165-79.
10. Blais, A., Gidengil, E., Nevitte, N. and Nadeau, R. (2004) 'Do (Some) Canadian Voters Punish a Prime Minister for Calling a Snap Election?', Political Studies, 52 (2), 307-23.
11. Budge, I. and Bara, J. (2001) 'Still New Labour?', in P. Norris (ed.), Britain Votes, 2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 26-42.
12. Butler, D. and Stokes, D. (1974) Political Change in Britain: The Evolution of Electoral Preference. London: Macmillan.
13. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E. and Stokes, D. E. (1960) The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
14. Clarke, H. D., Jenson, J., LeDuc, L. and Pammett, J. H. (1979) Political Choice in Canada. Toronto: McGraw Hill Ryerson.
15. Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M. and Whiteley, P. F. (2004) Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Converse, P. E. (1964) 'The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics', in D. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press, pp. 206-61.
17. Converse, P. E. (1990) 'Popular Representation and the Distribution of Information', in J. A. Ferejohn and J. Kuklinski (eds), Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana and Chicago IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 369-90.
18. Converse, P. E. (1995) 'Foreword', in R. E. Petty and J. A. Krosnick (eds). Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Mahwah NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, pp. xi-xvi.
19. Crewe, I. and King, A. (1994) 'Did Major Win? Did Kinnock Lose? Leadership Effects in the 1992 Election', in A. Heath, R. Jowell and J. Curtice (eds), Labour's Last Chance? The 1992 Election and Beyond. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
20. Davis, J. A. (1985) The Logic of Causal Order. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage University series, Quantitative applications in the social sciences, pp. 7-55.
21. Delli Carpini, M. X. and Keeter, S. (1996) What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
22. Denzau, A. T. and North, D. C. (2000) 'Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions', in A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins and S. L. Popkin (eds), Elements of Reason Cognition, Choice and the Bounds of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 70-95.
23. Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
24. Dunleavy, P. (1998) 'Political Behaviour: Institutional and Experiential Approaches', in R. E. Goodin and H. D. Klingemann (eds), A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 276-93.
25. Evans, G. and Heath, A. (1993) 'A Tactical Error in the Analysis of Tactical Voting: A Response to Niemi, Whitten and Franklin', British Journal of Political Science, 23 (1), 131-7.
26. Fazio, R. H. (1989) 'On the Power and Functionality of Attitudes: The Role of Attitude Accessibility', in A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler and A. G. Greenwald (eds). Attitude Structure and Function. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 153-79.
27. Fazio, R. H. and Williams, C. J. (1986) 'Attitude Accessibility as a Moderator of the Attitude Perception and Attitude-Behaviour Relations: An Investigation of the 1984 Presidential Election', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (3), 505-14.
28. Feldman, S. (1988) 'Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values', American Journal of Political Science, 32 (3), 426-40.
29. Festinger, L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
30. Fiorina, M. P. (1975) 'Formal Models in Political Science', American Journal of Political Science, 18 (1), 133-59.
31. Fiorina, M. P. (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
32. Fiske, S. T. and Kinder, D. R. (1981) 'Involvement, Expertise and Schema Use: Evidence from Political Cognition', in N. Cantor and J. F. Kihlstrom (eds), Personality, Cognition and Social Interaction. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 171-90.
33. Fiske, S. T., Lau, R. R. and Smith, R. A. (1990) 'On the Varieties and Utilities of Political Expertise', Social Cognition, 8(1), 31-48.
34. Goddard, P., Scammell, M. and Semetko, H. A. (1998) 'Too Much of a Good Thing? Television in the 1997 Election Campaign', in I. Crewe, B. Gosschalk and J. Bartle (eds), Political Communications: Why Labour Won the General Election of 1997. London: Frank Cass, pp. 149-75.
35. Goren, P. (1997) 'Political Expertise and Issue Voting in Presidential Elections', Political Research Quarterly, 50 (3), 387-412.
36. Graetz, B. and McAllister, I. (1987) 'Party Leaders and Election Outcomes in Britain, 1974-1983', Comparative Political Studies, 19 (4), 484-507.
37. Hamill, R., Lodge, M. and Blake, F. (1985) 'The Breadth, Depth and Utility of Class, Partisan and Ideological Schemata', American Journal of Political Science, 29 (4), 850-70.
38. Heider, F. (1944) 'Social Perception and Phenomenal Causality', Journal of Psychology, 51 (1), 107-12.
39. Hibbs, D. A., Rivers, D. and Vasilatos, N. (1982) 'The Dynamics of Political Support for American Presidents among Occupational and Partisan Groups', American Journal of Political Science, 26 (3), 312-32.
40. Jaccard, J. (2001) Interaction Effects in Logistic Regression. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage University series, Quantitative applications in the social sciences, pp. 7-135.
41. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R. and Wan, C. K. (1990) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Series: Thousand Oaks CA: Sage University series, Quantitative applications in the social sciences, pp. 7-72.
42. Jackson, J. A. (1975) 'Issues, Party Choices and Presidential Votes', American Journal of Political Science, 19 (2), 161-85.
43. Judd, C. M. and Downing, J. W. (1990) 'Political Expertise and the Development of Attitude Consistency', Social Cognition, 8 (1), 104-24.
44. Judd, C. M. and Krosnick, J. A. (1989) 'The Structural Bases of Consistency among Political Attitudes: Effects of Political Expertise and Attitude Importance', in A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Beckler and A. G. Greenwald (eds), Attitude Structure and Function. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 99-128.
45. King, A. (2002) 'Do Leaders' Personalities Really Matter?' in A. King (ed.), Leaders Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-43.
46. King, G. (1989) Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. King, G., Keohane, R. O. and Verba, S. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
48. Klingemann, H. D. (1979) 'Measuring Ideological Conceptualisation', in S. H. Barnes and M. Kaase (eds), Political Action. Beverley Hills CA: Sage, pp. 203-34.
49. Krosnick, J. A. (1990) 'Expertise and Political Psychology', Social Cognition, 8 (1) (1990), 1-8.
50. Krosnick, J. A. (1991) 'Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys', Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5 (2), 213-36.
51. Krosnick, J. A. and Petty, R. E. (1995) 'Attitude Strength: An Overview' in R. E. Petty and J. A. Krosnick (eds), Attitude Strength: Causes and Consequences. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1-24.
52. Liao, T. F. (1994) Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit and Other Generalised Linear Models. Beverley Hills CA: Sage.
53. Lippmann, W. (1997) Public Opinion. New York: Free Press.
54. Lodge, M. and Hamill, R. (1986) 'A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing', American Political Science Review, 80 (2), 505-19.
55. Miller, W. E. (1999) 'Temporal Order and Causal Inference', Political Analysis, 8 (2), 119-46.
56. Miller, W. E. and Shanks, J. M. (1996) The New American Voter. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Niemi, R. and Bartels, L. M. (1985) 'New Measures of Issue Salience: An Evaluation', Journal of Politics, 47 (4), 1212-20.
58. Nisbett, R. E. and DeCamp Wilson, T. (1977) 'Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes', Psychological Review, 34 (2), 231-59.
59. Norris, P., Curtice, J., Sanders, D., Scammell, M. and Semetko, H. A. (1999) On Message: Communicating the Campaign. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
60. O'Brien, K (1993) 'When to Use Focus Groups and Why', in D. L. Morgan (ed.), Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. London: Sage, pp. 105-17.
61. Popkin, S. L. (1993) 'Information Shortcuts and the Reasoning Voter', in B. Grofman (ed.), Information, Participation & Choice: An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 17-35.
62. Rahn, W. M., Aldrich, J. H., Borgida, E. and Sullivan, J. L. (1990) 'A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal', in J. A. Ferejohn and Kuklinski (eds), Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana and Chicago IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 136-59.
63. RePass, D. (1971) 'Issue Salience and Party Choice', American Political Science Review, 65 (2), 389-400.
64. Rivers, D. (1988) 'Heterogeneity in Models of Electoral Choice', American Journal of Political Science, 85 (3), 737-57.
65. Sanders, D., Burton, J. and Kneeshaw, J. (2002) 'Identifying the True Identifiers: A Question Wording Experiment', Party Politics, 8 (2), 193-205.
66. Schumann, H. and Presser, S. (1996) Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Context. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
67. Seymour-Ure, C. (1998) 'Leaders and Leading Articles: Characterisation of John Major and Tony Blair in the Editorials of the National Daily Press', in I. Crewe, B. Gosschalk and J. Bartle (eds), Political Communications: Why Labour Won the Election of 1997. London: Frank Cass, pp. 131-48.
68. Spector, P. E. (1994) 'Summated Rating Scale Construction', in M. S. Lewis-Beck (ed.), Basic Measurement. Beverley Hills CA: Sage Publications, Toppan Publishing, pp. 229-99.
69. Stewart, M. C. and Clarke, H. D. (1992) 'The (Un)Importance of Party Leaders: Leader Images and Party Choice in the 1987 British Election', Journal of Politics, 54 (2), 447-70.
70. Zaller, J. R. (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.