How product trial changes quality perception of four new processed beef products

Meat Science

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 119-127

  Saeed, Faiza ^a   Grunert, Klaus G ^a   Therkildsen, Margrethe ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Demographics; Expected and experienced quality; Processed meat; Prototypes testing; Repeated measures technique

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS; DEMOGRAPHICS; FOOD QUALITY; MARKET INTRODUCTION; PROCESSED MEAT; QUALITY EVALUATION; REPEATED MEASURES; TWO-PRODUCT;

MEATS; POPULATION STATISTICS; QUALITY ASSURANCE;

QUALITY CONTROL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; CONSUMER; FEMALE; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD QUALITY; HUMAN; MALE; MEAT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANIMALS; CATTLE; COMMERCE; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; FEMALE; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD QUALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MEAT PRODUCTS; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; SEX FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867025201     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Banovic M., Grunert K.G., Barreira M.M., Fontes M.A. Beef quality perception at the point of purchase: A study from Portugal. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:335-342.
2. Bredahl L. Cue utilisation and quality perception with regard to branded beef. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 15:65-75.
3. Bredahl L., Grunert K.G., Fertin C. Relating consumer perceptions of pork quality to physical product characteristics. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9:273-281.
4. Brunsø K., Bredahl L., Grunert K.G., Scholderer J. Consumer perception of the quality of beef resulting from various fattening regimes. Livestock Production Science 2005, 4:83-93.
5. Cooper R.G. From experience. The invisible success factors in product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1999, 16:115-133.
6. de Barcellos M.D., Kügler J.O., Grunert K.G., Van Wezemael L., Pérez-Cueto F.J.A., Ueland Ø., et al. European consumers' acceptance of beef processing technologies: A focus group study. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 2010, 11:721-732.
7. Grunert K.G. What's in a steak? A cross-cultural study of the quality perception of beef. Food Quality and Preference 1997, 8:157-174.
8. Grunert K.G. Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2005, 32:369-391.
9. Grunert K.G. Consumer behaviour with regard to food innovation: Quality perception and decision-making. Innovation in agri-food systems 2005, 57-85. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. W.M.F. Jongen, M.T.G. Meulenberg (Eds.).
10. Grunert K.G. Future trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Science 2006, 74:149-160.
11. Grunert K.G., Bredahl L., Brunsø K. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector - A review. Meat Science 2004, 66:259-272.
12. Grunert K.G., Valli C. Designer-made meat and dairy products: Consumer-led product development. Livestock Production Science 2001, 72:83-98.
13. Grunert K.G., Verbeke W., Kügler J., Saeed F., Scholderer J. Use of consumer insight in the new product development process in the meat sector. Meat Science 2011, 89:251-258.
14. Kristensen K., Ostergaard P., Juhl H.J. Success and failure of product development in the Danish food sector. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9:333-342.
15. Lewis J.N., Teratanavat R., Beckley J., Jeltema M.A. Using a consumer-driven rapid product navigation process to develop an optimal product. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:1052-1058.
16. Nambisan S. Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory. Academy of Management Review 2002, 27:392-413.
17. Narasimhan C., Sen S.K. New product models for test market data. Journal of Marketing 1983, 47(1):11-24.
18. Oliver R.L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research 1980, 17:460-469.
19. Oliver R.L. Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research 1993, 20:418-431.
20. Oliver R.L. Satisfaction: A behavioural perspective on the consumer 2009, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY. 2nd edition.
21. Parfitt J.H., Collins B.J.K. The use of consumer panels for brand share prediction. Journal of Marketing Research 1968, 5:131-145.
22. Reicks A.I., Brooks J.C., Garmyn A.J., Thompson L.D., Lyford C.I., Miller M.F. Demographic and beef preferences affect consumer motivation for purchasing fresh beef steaks and roast. Meat Science 2011, 87:403-411.
23. Søndergaard H.A., Harmsen H. Using market information in product development. Journal of Consumer Marketing 2007, 24:194-204.
24. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M. Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research 1990, 21:309-333.
25. Van Kleef E., Van Trijp H.C.M., Luning P. Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: A critical review of methods and techniques. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16:181-201.
26. Verbeke W., Pérez-Cueto F.J.A., de Barcellos M.D., Krystallis A., Grunert K.G. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Science 2010, 84:284-292.