Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: A preliminary assessment

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 81, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3222-3228

  Zheng, Bin ^a   Sumkin, Jules H ^b   Zuley, Margarita L ^b   Wang, Xingwei ^a   Klym, Amy H ^a   Gur, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer risk assessment; Full field digital mammography; Mammographic density; Risk model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CANCER; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER RISK; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DENSITY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; GROUPS BY AGE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DENSITOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PENNSYLVANIA; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84867022451     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.018     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. A. Jemal, R. Siegel, J. Xu, and E. Ward Cancer statistics, 2010 CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 60 2010 277 300
2. R.A. Smith, V. Cokkindes, and D. Brooks Cancer screening in the United States, 2011 CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 61 2011 8 30
3. E.A. Sickles, D.E. Wolverton, and K.E. Dee Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists Radiology 224 2002 861 869
4. J.J. Fenton, J. Wheeler, and P.A. Carney Reality check: perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers American Journal of Roentgenology 187 2006 42 46
5. US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement Annals of Internal Medicine 151 2009 716 726
6. L. Berlin, and F.M. Hall More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs and polarization Radiology 255 2010 311 316
7. D.S Buist, M.L. Anderson, and S.J. Haneuse Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States Radiology 259 2011 72 84
8. J.T. Schousboe, K. Kerlikowske, A. Loh, and S.R. Cummings Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness Annals of Internal Medicine 155 2011 10 21
9. E. Amir, O.C. Freedman, B. Seruga, and D.G. Evans Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models Journal of the National Cancer Institute 102 2010 680 691
10. A.F. Saftlas, R.N. Hoover, and L.A. Brinton Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer Cancer 67 1991 2833 2838
11. N.F. Boyd, I.J. Martin, and J. Stone Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention Current Oncology Reports 3 2001 314 321
12. C.M. Vachon, T.A. Sellers, and E.E. Carlson Strong evidence of a genetic determinant for mammographic density, a major risk factor for breast cancer Cancer Research 67 2007 8412 8418
13. L.J Martin, O. Melnichouk, and H. Guo Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 19 2010 456 463
14. W.A. Berg, C. Campassi, P. Langenberg, and M.J. Sexton Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter- and intra-observer variability in feature analysis and final assessment American Journal of Roentgenology 174 2000 1769 1777
15. R. Highnam, X. Pan, and R. Warren Breast composition measurements using retrospective standard mammogram form (SMF) Physics in Medicine & Biology 51 2006 2696 2713
16. C.K. Glide-Hurst, N. Duric, and P. Littrup A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density Medical Physics 34 2007 4491 4498
17. Y.H. Chang, X.H. Wang, and L.A. Hardesty Computerized assessment of tissue composition on digitized mammograms Academic Radiology 9 2002 898 905
18. M.P. Madigan, R.G. Ziegler, and J. Benichou Proportion of breast cancer cases in the United States explained by well-established risk factors Journal of the National Cancer Institute 87 1995 1681 1685
19. M.H. Gail, and P.L. Mai Comparing breast cancer risk assessment models Journal of the National Cancer Institute 102 2010 665 668
20. K. Passaperuma, E. Warner, K.A. Hill, A. Gunasekara, and M.J. Yaffe Is mammographic breast density a breast cancer risk factor in women with BRCA mutations Journal of Clinical Oncology 28 2010 3779 3783
21. D. Scutt, G.A. Lancaster, and J.T. Manning Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer Breast Cancer Research 8 2006 R14 10.1186/bcr1388
22. D. Scutt, J.T. Manning, and G.H. Whitehouse The relationship between breast asymmetry, breast size and the occurrence of breast cancer British Journal of Radiology 70 1997 1017 1021
23. R.G Blanks, M.G. Wallis, and R.M. Given-Wilson Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography Journal of Medical Screening 6 1999 152 158
24. J. Wei, H.P. Chang, and Y. Wu Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study Radiology 260 2011 42 49
25. S.M. Domchek, and A. Antoniou Cancer risk models: translating family history into clinical management Annals of Internal Medicine 147 2007 515 517
26. B. Zheng, J.H. Sumkin, M. Zuley, D. Lederman, X. Wang, and D. Gur Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: a performance assessment The British Journal of Radiology 2011 10.1259/bjr/51461617
27. X. Wang, D. Lederman, J. Tan, X.H. Wang, and B. Zheng Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast cancer risk stratification Academic Radiology 17 2010 1234 1241
28. S. Giatto, and M. Zappa A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience European Journal of Radiology 17 1993 122 125
29. N.F. Boyd, H. Guo, and L.J. Martin Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer New England Journal of Medicine 356 2007 670 675
30. A.H. Olsen, K. Bihrmann, M.B. Jensen, I. Vejborg, and E. Lynge Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study British Journal of Cancer 10 2009 1052 1059
31. C.H. van Gils, J.D. Otten, A.L. Verbeek, and J.H. Hendriks Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality? European Journal of Epidemiology 14 1998 315 320
32. C. Colin, V. Prince, and P.J. Alette Can mammographic assessment lead to consider density as a risk factor for breast cancer? European Journal of Radiology 2010 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.001
33. J. Harvey, and V.E. Bovbjerg Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk Radiology 230 2004 29 41
34. D.B. Kopans Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk Radiology 246 2008 348 353
35. O.W. Brawley Risk-based mammography screening: an effort to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms Annals of Internal Medicine 156 2012 662 663