Risk-based mammography screening: An effort to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 156, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 662-663

  Brawley, Otis W ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER INVASION; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EDITORIAL; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOLOGIST; TUMOR BIOPSY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84860364637     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00012     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Shah M, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2011: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61: 8-30.[PMID: 21205832]
2. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151: 716-726+W-236.[PMID: 19920272]
3. van Ravesteyn NT, Miglioretti DL, Stout NK, Lee SJ, Schechter CB, Buist DS, et al. Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years. A comparative modeling study of risk. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:609-617.
4. Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A, Fu R, Griffin J, O'Meara ES, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:635-648.
5. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2008. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2012.
6. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10-29.[PMID: 22237781]
7. Cronin KA, Feuer EJ, Clarke LD, Plevritis SK. Impact of adjuvant therapy and mammography on U.S. mortality from 1975 to 2000: comparison of mortality results from the cisnet breast cancer base case analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2006:112-121.[PMID: 17032901]
8. Haukka J, Byrnes G, Boniol M, Autier P. Trends in breast cancer mortality in Sweden before and after implementation of mammography screening. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22422.[PMID: 21966354]
9. Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation Group. Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15: 45-51.[PMID: 16434585]
10. Squiers LB, Holden DJ, Dolina SE, Kim AE, Bann CM, Renaud JM. The public's response to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 recommendations on mammography screening. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:497-504.[PMID: 21496748]
11. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. The benefits and harms of mammography screening: understanding the trade-offs. JAMA. 2010;303:164-165.[PMID:20068211]
12. Kramer BS. The science of early detection. Urol Oncol. 2004;22:344-347.[PMID: 15283894]
13. Porter PL, El-Bastawissi AY, Mandelson MT, Lin MG, Khalid N, Watney EA, et al. Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:2020-2028.[PMID: 10580027]
14. Zahl PH, Strand BH, Maehlen J. Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2004;328:921-924.[PMID: 15013948]
15. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1089-1096.[PMID: 9545356]
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cancer screening- United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:41-45.[PMID:22278157]
17. Habbema JD, Schechter CB, Cronin KA, Clarke LD, Feuer EJ. Modeling cancer natural history, epidemiology, and control: reflections on the CISNET breast group experience. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2006:122-126.[PMID:17032902]
18. Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH, Yankaskas BC, Ernster VL, Rosenberg RD, Carney PA, et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169: 1001-1008.[PMID: 9308451]
19. Nicholson BT, LoRusso AP, Smolkin M, Bovbjerg VE, Petroni GR, Harvey JA. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:1143-1149.[PMID: 16935726]
20. Hoskins LM, Roy KM, Greene MH. Toward a new understanding of risk perception among young female BRCA1/2 "previvors". Fam Syst Health. 2012; 30:32-46.[PMID: 22429077]