Impact of Preconditioning Pulse on Lesion Formation During High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Histotripsy

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1918-1929

  Xu, Jin ^a   Bigelow, Timothy A ^a   Riesberg, Grant M ^a  

^a Iowa State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cavitation; HIFU; Histotripsy; Mechanical effect; Thermal effect

Indexed keywords

BUBBLE CLOUD; COMPRESSIONAL; FOCAL PLANE; HIFU; HIGH INTENSITY; HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; HISTOTRIPSY; LESION FORMATION; LESION VOLUME; LOW DUTY FACTOR; MECHANICAL EFFECTS; PORCINE MUSCLES; REAL TIME MONITORING; STEP SIZE; TEMPERATURE INCREASE; THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION; THERMAL IMAGERS; TISSUE TEMPERATURES; TONE BURSTS; TREATMENT PLANNING;

COAGULATION; THERMAL EFFECTS; TISSUE; ULTRASONICS;

CAVITATION;

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; HISTOTRIPSY; MUSCLE TISSUE; NONHUMAN; PRECONDITIONING PULSE; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; SWINE; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER;

ANIMALS; HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND ABLATION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; RADIATION DOSAGE; SWINE;

EID: 84866994122     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: 1879291X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Blana A., Walter B., Rogenhofer S., Wieland W.F. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience. Urology 2004, 63:297-300.
2. Cain C. Histotripsy: Controlled mechanical sub-division of soft tissues by high intensity focused ultrasound. 5th International Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound 2005:T005.
3. Canney M.S., Bailey M.R., Crum L.A. Acoustic characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound fields: A combined measurement and modeling approach. J Acoust Soc Am 2008, 124:2406-2420.
4. Chen E.J., Novakofski J., Jenkins W.K., William D., O'Brien J. Young's modulus measurements of soft tissues with application to elasticity imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1996, 43:191-194.
5. Clarke R.L., ter Haar G.R.T. Temperature rise recorded during lesion formation by high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997, 23:299-306.
6. Cooper M., Xu Z., Rothman E.D., Levin A.M., Advincula A.P., Fowlkes J.B., Cain C.A. Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: The effects of tissue type, exposure parameters and the role of dynamic microbubble activity. IEEE Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Joint 50th Anniversary Conference 2004, 1808-1811.
7. Coussios C.C., Farny C.H., ter Haar G.R., Roy R.A. Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Int J Hyperthermia 2007, 23:105-120.
8. Damianou C., Pavlou M., Velev O., Kyriakou K., Trimikliniotis M. High intensity focused ultrasound ablation of kidney guided by MRI. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004, 30:397-404.
9. Hall T.L., Fowlkes J.B., Cain C.A. Imaging feedback of tissue liquefaction (histotripsy) in ultrasound surgery. 2005 IEEE Int Ultrason Symp 2005, 1-4:1732-1734.
10. Hall T.L., Fowlkes J.B., Cain C.A. A real-time measure of cavitation induced tissue disruption by ultrasound imaging backscatter reduction. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2007, 54:569-575.
11. Holt R.G., Roy R.A. Measurements of bubble-enhanced heating from focused, MHz-frequency ultrasound in a tissue-mimicking material. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001, 27:1399-1412.
12. Hsu M.-C., Chang H., Chen Y.-Y., Lin W.-L. High intensity focused ultrasound thermal therapy for liver tumor with respiration motion. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 2006, 1734-1737.
13. Huber P.E., Debus J. Tumor cytotoxicity in vivo and radical formation in vitro depend on the shock wave-induced cavitation dose. Radiat Res 2001, 156:301-309.
14. Hynynen K., Pomeroy O., Smith D.N., Huber P.E., McDannold N.J., Kettenbach J., Baum J., Singer S., Jolesz F.A. MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of fibroadenomas in the breast: A feasibility study. Radiology 2001, 219:176-185.
15. Ikeda T., Yoshizawa S., Tosaki M., Allen J.S., Takagi S., Ohta N., Kitamura T., Matsumoto Y. Cloud cavitation control for lithotripsy using high intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006, 32:1383-1397.
16. Khokhlova V.A., Bailey M.R., Reed J.A., Cunitz B.W., Kaczkowski P.J., Crum L.A. Effects of nonlinear propagation, cavitation, and boiling in lesion formation by high intensity focused ultrasound in a gel phantom. J Acoust Soc Am 2006, 119:1834-1848.
17. Kim Y., Fifer C.G., Gelehrter S.K. Non-invasive fetal therapy using histotripsy: Feasibility study in the sheep model. IEEE Int Ultrason Symp Proc 2009, 228-231.
18. Kuznetsov V.P. Equations of nonlinear acoustics. Sov Phys Acoust 1971, 16:467-470.
19. Mathur A.B., Collinsworth A.M., Reichert W.M., Kraus W.E., Truskey G.A. Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. J Biomech 2001, 34:1545-1553.
20. Maxwell A.D., Cain C.A., Duryea A.P. Noninvasive thrombolysis using pulsed ultrasound cavitation therapy-histotripsy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009, 35:1982-1994.
21. Maxwell A.D., Owens G., Gurm H.S. In-vivo study of non-invasive thrombolysis by histotripsy in a porcine model. IEEE Int Ultrason Symp Proc 2009, 220-223.
22. Maxwell A.D., Wang T.-Y., Cain C.A. The role of compressional pressure in the formation of dense bubble clouds in histotripsy. IEEE Int Ultrason Symp Proc 2009, 81-84.
23. Orvieto M.A., Zorn kC., Lyon M.B., Tolhurst S.R., Rapp D.E., Seip R., Sanghvi N., Shalhav A. High intensity focused ultrasound renal tissue ablation; a laparoscopic porcine model. J Urol 2009, 181:861-866.
24. Parsons J.E., Cain C.A., Abrams G.D., Fowlkes J.B. Pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy for controlled tissue homogenization. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006, 32:115-129.
25. Parsons J.E., Cain C.A., Fowlkes J.B. Spatial variability in acoustic backscatter as an indicator of tissue homogenate production in pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2007, 54:576-590.
26. Rabkin B.A., Zderic V., Vaezy S. Hyperecho in ultrasound images of HIFU therapy: Involvement of cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005, 31:947-956.
27. Reilly G.C., Engler A.J. Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation. J Biomech 2009, 43:55-62.
28. Sboros V. Response of contrast agents to ultrasound. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2008, 60:1117-1136.
29. Soneson J.E. A user-friendly software package for HIFU simulation. 8th International Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound. AIP Conference Proceedings 2009, 1113:165-169.
30. Uchida T., Muramoto M., Kyunou H., Iwamura M., Egawa S., Koshiba K. Clinical outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: Preliminary report. Urology 1998, 52:66-71.
31. Wang T.-Y., Xu Z., Hall T.L., Fowlkes J.B., Roberts W.W., Cain C.A. Active focal zone sharpening for high-precision treatment using histotripsy. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2011, 58:305-315.
32. Wang T.-Y., Xu Z., Winterroth F. Quantitative ultrasound backscatter for pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy-histotripsy. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2009, 56:995-1005.
33. Wang T.Y., Maxwell A.D., Park S., Xu Z., Fowlkes J.B., Cain C.A. Why are short pulses more efficient in tissue erosion using pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy (histotripsy)?. AIP Conf Proc 2010, 1215:40-43.
34. Wannah W.M., Childress D.S. Indentor tests and finite element modeling of bulk muscular tissue in vivo. J Rehabil Res Dev 1996, 33:239-252.
35. Wong J.Y., Leach J.B., Brown X.Q. Balance of chemistry, topography, and mechanics at the cell-biomaterial interface: Issues and challenges for assessing the role of substrate mechanics on cell response. Surf Sci Biosurf V Funct Polym Surf Biotechnol 2004, 570:119-133.
36. Xu J., Bigelow T.A. Experimental investigation of the effect of stiffness, exposure time and scan direction on the dimension of ultrasound histotripsy lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011, 37:1865-1873.
37. Xu J., Bigelow T.A., Halverson L.J., Middendorf J.M., Rusk B. Minimization of treatment time for in vitro 1.1 MHz destruction of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by high-intensity focused ultrasound. Ultrasoinics 2012, 52:668-675.
38. Xu Z., Fan z, Hall T.L., Winterroth F., Fowlkes J.B., Cain C.A. Size measurement of tissue debris particles generated from pulsed ultrasound cavitational therapy-histotripsy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009, 35:245-255.
39. Xu Z., Fowlkes J.B., Cain C.A. A new strategy to enhance cavitational tissue erosion using a high-intensity initiating sequence. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2006, 53:1412-1424.
40. Xu Z., Hall T.L., Fowlkes J.B., Cain C.A. Optical and acoustic monitoring of bubble cloud dynamics at a tissue-fluid interface in ultrasound tissue erosion. J Acoust Soc Am 2007, 121:2421-2430.
41. Xu Z., Ludomirsky A., Eun L.Y. Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2004, 51:726-736.
42. Xu Z., Raghavan M., Hall T.L., Chang C.-W., Mycek M.-A., Fowlkes J.B., Cain C.A. High speed imaging of bubble clouds generated in pulsed ultrasound cavitational therapy-histotripsy. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2007, 54:2091-2101.
43. Yoshizawa S., Ikeda T., Ito A., Ota R., Takagi S., Matsumoto Y. High intensity focused ultrasound lithotripsy with cavitating microbubbles. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009, 47:851-860.
44. Zabolotskaya E.A., Khokhlov R.V. Quasi-plane waves in the nonlinear acoustics of confined beams. Sov Phys Acoust 1969, 15:35-40.