Social categorization, intergroup emotions, and aggressive interactions

Intergroup Relations: The Role of Motivation and Emotion

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 162-181

  Otten, Sabine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866980558     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203877005     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Brown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and antinorm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912.
2. Baron, R. A. (ed.). (1977). Human aggression. New York: Plenum Press.
3. Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 45-62.
4. Braun, B. M., Otten, S., & Gordijn, E. H. (2008a). Ingroup favoritism or black-sheep effect? The role of group affiliations and ambiguity of negative intentions in aggressive interactions. Unpublished manuscript, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
5. Braun, B. M., Otten, S., & Gordijn, E. H. (2008b). Ingroup versus outgroup bias in aggressive interaction: The interactive role of cognitive load and ambiguity of negative intentions. Unpublished manuscript, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
6. Brewer, M. B. (2003). Intergroup relations (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
7. Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.) (pp. 554-594) New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
9. Cottrell, C., & Neuberg, S. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to "prejudice". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770-789.
10. Dumont, M., Yzerbyt, V., & Wigboldus, D. (2003). Social categorization and fear reactions to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1509-1520.
11. Duncan, B. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of Blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 590-598.
12. Ekker, B. M., Otten, S., & Gordijn, E. H. (2007). Was het een van ons? Groepslid-maatschap en ambiguïteit als determinanten van reacties op schadelijk gedrag [Was it one of us? Group membership and ambiguity as determinants of reactions to harmful behavior]. In C. Van Laar, R. Ruiter, J. Karremans, W. Van Rijswijk, & F. Van Harreveld (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2006 (pp 135-144). Groningen: ASPO pers.
13. Ellemers, N. van Rijswijk, W. Roelfs, M., & Simons, C. (1997). Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 186-198.
14. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Giebels, E., & Janssen, O. (2005). Conflict stress and reduced well-being at work: The buffering effect of third-party help. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 137-155.
16. Gordijn, E. H., Wigboldus, D., & Yzerbyt, V. (2001). Emotional consequences of categorizing victims of negative outgroup behavior as ingroup or outgroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 317-326.
17. Gordijn, E. H., Yzerbyt, V., Wigboldus, D., & Dumont, M. (2005). Emotional reactions to harmful intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 15-30.
18. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
19. Jacoby, J., Otten, S., & Sassenberg, K. (2008). Not so black sheep: When positive ingroup valence eliminates the black sheep effect. Unpublished manuscript. Knowledge Media Research Center, Tübingen, Germany.
20. Kamans, E., Otten, S., & Gordijn, E. (2007). Machteloos maar boos! De invloed van dreiging op emoties en gedragsneigingen van machteloze groepen [Powerless but angry! The effect of threat on emotions and action tendencies in low power groups]. In C. Van Laar, R. Ruiter, J. Karremans, W. Van Rijswijk, & F. Van Harreveld (Eds.), Jaarboek sociale psychologie 2006 (pp. 215-224). Groningen: ASPO pers.
21. Knuijver, S., Kornfeld, A., Ravensbergen, L., Timmer, C., & Witteman, J. (2006). Aggression and social identities. Unpublished bachelor thesis, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
22. Lieberman, J. S., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). A hot new way to measure aggression: Hot sauce allocation. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 331-348.
23. Lindsay, J. A., & Anderson, C. A. (2000). From antecedent conditions to violent actions: The general affective aggression model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 34-44.
24. Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616.
25. Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2002). Intergroup emotions and the social self. Prejudice reconceptualized as differential reactions to outgroups. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), The social self. Cognitive, interpersonal and intergroup perspectives (pp. 309-326). New York: Psychology Press.
26. Marques, J., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of ingroup deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436-447.
27. Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (1994). The black sheep effect: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, (Vol. 5, pp. 37-68). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
28. Marques, J. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter-and intragroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292.
29. Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. P. (1988). The "black sheep effect": Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
30. Mummendey, A., Linneweber, V., & Löschper, G. (1984). Actor or victim of aggression: Divergent perspectives - divergent evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 297-311.
31. Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1989). Perspective-specific differences in the evaluation of aggressive interaction sequences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 23-40.
32. Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1993). Aggression: Interactions between individuals and social groups. In R. B. Felson & J. T. Tedeschi (Eds.), Aggression and violence (pp. 145-167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33. Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1998). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 107-143). New York: Wiley.
34. Otten, S., & Jacoby, J. (2004). Perceived aggression by Dutch and German soccer supporters during the European championships 2004. Unpublished data, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
35. Otten, S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Evidence for implicit evaluative ingroup bias: Affect-biased spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 77-89.
36. Otten, S., & Mummendey, A. (2002a). Sozialpsychologische Theorien aggressiven Verhaltens [Social-psychological theories of aggressive behaviour]. In D. Frey (Hrsg.), Theorien der sozialpsychologie (2, völlig überarbeitete Auflage) [Theories of social psychology (2nd completely revised edition)] (pp. 198-216). Bern: Huber.
37. Otten, S., & Mummendey, A. (2002b). Social discrimination and aggression: A matter of perspective-specific divergence? In W. Kallmeyer & C. F. Graumann (Eds.), Perspecitivity and perspectivation in discourse (pp. 233-250). Wilrijk: John Benjamins Publishers.
38. Otten, S., Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1995). Evaluation of aggressive interactions in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 205-224.
39. Otten, S., & Stapel, D. A. (2007). Who is this Donald? How social categorization shapes aggression priming effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1000-1015.
40. Otten, S., & Wentura, D. (1999). About the impact of automaticity in the minimal group paradigm. Evidence from an affective priming task. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1049-1071.
41. Rogers, R. W., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1981). Deindividuation and anger-mediated interracial aggression: Unmasking regressive racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 63-73.
42. Sagar, H. A., & Schofield, J. W. (1980). Racial and behavioral cues in black and white children's perceptions of ambiguously aggressive acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 590-598.
43. Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
44. Smith, E. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In D. M.Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297-315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
46. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
47. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
48. Tedeschi, J. T., & Felson, R. B. (eds.). (1994). Aggression and coercive action: A social interactionist perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
49. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
50. Ufkes, E. G., Otten, S., Giebels, E., & van der Zee K. I. (2008). Categorization processes and conflicts in neighborhoods. Paper presented at the 21st Annual IACM Conference, Chicago, July 3-6, 2008.
51. van Prooijen, J.W. (2006). Retributive reactions to suspected offenders: The importance of social categorizations and guilt probability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 715-726.
52. Vogelzang, L., & Otten, S. (2006). Wij = schaamte, zij = woede. Een onderzoek naar de invloed van categorisatie en emoties op de beoordeling van daders [We = shame, they = anger. A study on the impact of categorization and emotions on judgments about perpetrators]. Unpublished manuscript, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.