Formatt: Correcting protein multiple structural alignments by incorporating sequence alignment

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Daniels, Noah M ^a   Nadimpalli, Shilpa ^b   Cowen, Lenore J ^a  

^a Tufts University   (United States)

^b Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORE SIZE; GEOMETRIC FUNCTIONS; GEOMETRIC INFORMATION; GEOMETRIC METHOD; MULTIPLE STRUCTURE ALIGNMENTS; PROTEIN CHAINS; PROTEIN SEQUENCES; PROTEIN STRUCTURE ALIGNMENT; REMOTE HOMOLOGY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENTS; SEQUENCE INFORMATIONS; SEQUENCE SIMILARITY; STRUCTURAL ALIGNMENTS; STRUCTURAL MEASURES; STRUCTURE ALIGNMENT; TWILIGHT ZONE;

BENCHMARKING; GEOMETRY; PROTEINS;

ALIGNMENT;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; METHODOLOGY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84866980473     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-259     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hasegawa H, Holm L. Advances and pitfalls of protein structural alignment. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009, 19(3):341-348. 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.04.003, 19481444.
2. Grishin NV. KH domain: one motif, two folds. Nucleic Acids Res 2001, 29(3):638-643. 10.1093/nar/29.3.638, 30387, 11160884.
3. O'Sullivan O, Suhre K, Abergel C, Higgins D, Notredame C. 3DCoffee: combining protein sequences and structures with multiple sequence alignments. J Mol Biol 2004, 340:385-395. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.058, 15201059.
4. Pei J, Kim BH, Grishin NV. PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple protein sequence and structure alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:2295-2300. 10.1093/nar/gkn072, 2367709, 18287115.
5. Madhusudhan M, Webb BM, Marti-Renom MA, Eswar N, Sali A. Alignment of multiple protein structures based on sequence and structure features. Protein Engineering, Design and Selection 2009, 22:569-574. 10.1093/protein/gzp040, 2909824, 19587024.
6. Kim C, Lee B. Accuracy of structure-based sequence alignment of automatic methods. BMC Bioinf 2007, 8:355.
7. Menke M, Berger B, Cowen L. Matt: local flexibility aids protein multiple structure alignment. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4:e10. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040010, 2186361, 18193941.
8. Daniels N, Kumar A, Cowen L, Menke M. Touring protein space with Matt. Bioinf Res App 2010, 6053/2010:18-28.
9. Konagurthu A, Whisstock J, Stuckey P, Lesk A. MUSTANG: A multiple structural alignment algorithm. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2006, 64:559-574.
10. Notredame C, Higgins D, Heringa J. T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 2000, 302:205-217. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042, 10964570.
11. VanWalle I, Lasters I, Wyns L. SABmark-a benchmark for sequence alignment that covers the entire known fold space. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:1267-1268. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth493, 15333456.
12. Shatsky M, Nussinov R, Wolfson H. Optimization of multiple-sequence alignment based on multiple-structure alignment. Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics 2006, 62:209-217.
13. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL-W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994, 22:4673-4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673, 308517, 7984417.
14. Edgar R. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:1792-1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340, 390337, 15034147.
15. Do C, Mahabhashyam M, Brudno M, Batzoglou S. ProbCons: probabilistic consistency-based multiple sequence alignment. Genome Res 2005, 15:220-240.
16. Katoh K, Toh H. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2008, 9:286-298. 10.1093/bib/bbn013, 18372315.
17. Mizuguchi K, Deane C, Blundell TL, Overington J. HOMSTRAD: a database of protein structure alignments for homologous families. Protein Sci 1998, 11:2469-2471.
18. Kumar A, Cowen L. Recognition of beta structural motifs using hidden Markov models trained with simulated evolution. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:i287-i293. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq199, 2881384, 20529918.
19. Menke M, Berger B, Cowen L. Markov random fields reveal an N-terminal double propeller motif as part of a bacterial hybrid two-component sensor system. PNAS 2010, 107:4069-4074. 10.1073/pnas.0909950107, 2819974, 20147619.
20. Daniels NM, Hosur R, Berger B, Cowen LJ. SMURFLite: combining simplified Markov random fields with simulated evolution improves remote homology detection for beta-structural proteins into the twilight zone. Bioinformatics 2012, 28(9):1216-1222. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts110, 3338012, 22408192.
21. Shatsky M, Nussinov R, Wolfson H. Flexible protein alignment and hinge detection. Proteins 2002, 48:242-256. 10.1002/prot.10100, 12112693.
22. Ye Y, Godzik A. Flexible structure alignment by chaining aligned fragment pairs allowing twists. Bioinformatics 2003, Suppl 2:II246-II255.
23. Ye Y, Godzik A. Multiple flexible structure alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:2362-2369. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti353, 15746292.
24. Mosca R, Brannetti B, Schneider TR. Alignment of protein structures in the presence of domain motions. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:352. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-352, 2535786, 18727838.
25. Salem S, Zaki MJ, Bystroff C. FlexSnap: Flexible non-sequential protein structure alignment. Algorithms Mol Biol 2010, 12(5):1-13.
26. Eddy S. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:755-763. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755, 9918945.