An optimization approach to risk decision-making of closed-loop logistics based on SCOR model

Optimization

Volumn 61, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1221-1251

  Xiao, Renbin ^a   Cai, Zhengying ^b   Zhang, Xinhui ^c  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b CHINA THREE GORGES UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Wright State University   (United States)

Author keywords

closed loop logistics chain; genetic algorithm; risk assessment; supply chain operations reference model; vague set

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866857292     PISSN: 02331934     EISSN: 10294945     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02331934.2012.688827     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Altiparmak, F, Gen, M, Lin, L and Paksoy, T. 2006. A genetic algorithm approach for multi-objective optimization of supply chain networks. Comp. Ind. Eng., 51: 196-215.
2. Baron, MM and Elisabeth, MPC. 1999. Designing risk-management strategies for critical engineering systems. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 46: 87-100.
3. Baucells, M and Rata, C. 2006. A survey study of factors influencing risk-taking behavior in real-world decisions under uncertainty. Decision Anal., 3: 163-176.
4. Bickel, JE. 2007. Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufact. Service Operat. Manage., 9: 123-146.
5. Bickel, JE. 2008. The relationship between perfect and imperfect information in a two-action risk-sensitive problem. Decision Anal., 5: 116-128.
6. Brun, A, Caridi, M, Salama, KF and Ravelli, I. 2006. Value and risk assessment of supply chain management improvement projects. Int. J. Product. Econ., 99: 186-201.
7. Chan, HK. 2011. Supply chain systems-recent trend in research and applications. IEEE Syst. J., 5: 2-5.
8. Chan, FTS and Kumar, N. 2005. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Int. J. Manage. Sci., 41: 585-612.
9. Chen, X, Sim, M, David, SL and Sun, P. 2007. Risk aversion in inventory management. Operat. Res., 55: 828-842.
10. Chen, SM and Tan, JM. 1994. Handling multi-object fuzzy decision problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 67: 163-172.
11. Denizel, M, Ferguson, M and Souza, GC. 2010. Multiperiod remanufacturing planning with uncertain quality of inputs. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 57: 394-404.
12. Fan, ZP, Xiao, SH and Hu, GF. 2004. An optimization method for integrating two kinds of preference information in group decision-making. Comp. Ind. Eng., 46: 329-335.
13. Gau, WL and Buegrer, DJ. 1993. Vague sets. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet., 23: 610-614.
14. Hallikas, J, Karvonen, I, Pulkkinen, U, Virolainen, VM and Tuominen, M. 2004. Risk management processes in supplier networks. Int. J. Product. Econ., 90: 47-58.
15. Hallikas, J, Virolainen, VM and Tuominen, M. 2002. Risk analysis and assessment in network environments: A dyadic case study. Int. J. Product. Econ., 78: 45-55.
16. Hong, DH and Choi, CH. 2000. Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 114: 103-113.
17. Hunter, LM, Kasouf, CJ, Celuch, KG and Curry, KA. 2004. A classification of business-to-business buying decisions: Risk importance and probability as a framework for e-business benefits. Ind. Market. Manage., 33: 145-154.
18. Ko, HJ and Evans, GW. 2007. A genetic algorithm-based heuristic for the dynamic integrated forward/reverse logistics network for 3PLs. Comp. Operat. Res., 34: 346-366.
19. Miller, R and Lessard, D. 2001. Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects. Int. J. Project Manage., 19: 437-443.
20. Min, H, Ko, CS and Ko, HJ. 2006. The spatial and temporal consolidation of returned products in a closed-loop supply chain network. Comp. Ind. Eng., 51: 309-320.
21. Minner, S. 2001. Strategic safety stocks in reverse logistics supply chains. Int. J. Product. Econ., 71: 417-428.
22. Nagurney, A, Cruz, J, Dong, J and Zhang, D. 2005. Supply chain networks, electronic commerce, and supply side and demand side risk. Eur. J. Operat. Res., 164: 120-142.
23. Natarajan, K, Pachamanova, D and Sim, M. 2008. Incorporating asymmetric distributional information in robust Value-at-Risk optimization. Manage. Sci., 54: 573-585.
24. Olson, DL and Wu, DD. 2010. Earthquakes and risk management in China. Human Ecol. Risk Assess., 16: 478- 493.
25. Rammel, C and Jeroen van den Bergh, CJM. 2003. Evolutionary policies for sustainable development adaptive flexibility and risk minimizing. Ecol. Econ., 47: 121-133.
26. Ru, WG and Eloff, JHP. 1996. Risk analysis modelling with the use of fuzzy logic. Comp. Security, 15: 239-248.
27. SCC, Supply-chain operations reference-model overview version 9.0, Supply-Chain Council Inc. Available at www.supply-chain.org, 2008
28. Seuring, S. 2004. Industrial ecology, life cycles, supply chains differences and interrelations. Business Strat. Environ., 13: 306-319.
29. Sheu, JB, Chou, YH and Hu, CC. 2005. An integrated logistics operational model for green-supply chain management. Transport. Res. Part E, 41: 287-313.
30. Talluria, S, Narasimhana, R and Nair, A. 2006. Vendor performance with supply risk: A chance-constrained DEA approach. Int. J. Product. Econ., 100: 212-222.
31. Tsay, AA. 2002. Risk sensitivity in distribution channel partnerships implications for manufacturer return policies. J. Retail., 78: 147-160.
32. Wakker, PP, Timmermans, DRM and Machielse, I. 2007. The effects of statistical information on risk and ambiguity attitudes, and on rational insurance decisions. Manage. Sci., 53: 1770-1784.
33. Weber, CM and Fayed, A. 2010. Scale, scope, and speed-managing the challenges of multiproduct manufacturing. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manufact., 23: 30-38.
34. Wu, DD and Birge, JR. 2012. Serial chain merger evaluation model and application to mortgage banking. Decision Sci., 43: 5-36.
35. Wu, DD and Olson, DL. 2008. Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection. Int. J. Product. Econ., 114: 646-655.
36. Wu, DD and Olson, DL. 2010. Enterprise risk management: A DEA VaR approach in vendor selection. Int. J. Product. Res., 48: 4919-4932.
37. Wu, DD, Xie, K, Liu, H, Zhao, S and Olson, DL. 2010. Modeling technological innovation risks of an entrepreneurial team using system dynamics: An agent-based perspective. Technol. Forecast. Social Change, 77: 857-869.
38. Xiao, R, Cai, Z and Zhang, X. 2009. An optimization approach to cycle quality network chain based on improved SCOR model. Progr. Nat. Sci., 19: 881-890.