The effects of statistical information on risk and ambiguity attitudes, and on rational insurance decisions

Management Science

Volumn 53, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1770-1784

  Wakker, Peter P ^a   Timmermans, Daniëlle R M ^b   Machielse, Irma ^c  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adverse selection; Ambiguity; Health insurance; Risk attitude

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION MAKING; PUBLIC POLICY; RISK MANAGEMENT; STATISTICAL METHODS;

INSURANCE DECISIONS; NATURAL DECISION CONTEXT; RISK ATTITUDE;

INSURANCE;

EID: 38549181673     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: 15265501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0735     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abdellaoui, M. 2000. Parameter-free elicitation of utilities and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. 46 1497-1512.
2. Akerlof, G. A. 1970. The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84 488-500.
3. Barsky, R. B., F. T. Juster, M. S. Kimball, M. D. Shapiro. 1997. Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Quart. J. Econom. 112 537-579.
4. Bateman, I. J., A. Munro, B. Rhodes, C. Starmer, R. Sugden. 1997. Does part-whole bias exist? An experimental investigation. Econom. J. 107 322-332.
5. Binmore, K. G. 1999. Why experiments in economics? Econom. J. 109 F16-F24.
6. Birnbaum, M. H., G. Coffey, B. A. Mellers, R. Weiss. 1992. Utility measurement: Configural-weight theory and the judge's point of view. J. Experiment Psych.: Human Percept. Perform. 18 331-346.
7. Bleichrodt, H., J. L. Pinto. 2000. A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sci. 46 1485-1496.
8. Bleichrodt, H., J. L. Pinto. 2007. A new preference reversal in health utility measurement. Working paper, Economic Department, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
9. Bundorf, K. M., K. I. Simon. 2006. The effects of rate regulation on demand for supplemental health insurance. Amer. Econom. Rev., Papers Proc. 96 67-71.
10. Camerer, C. F., R. M. Hogarth. 1999. The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. J, Risk Uncertainty 19 7-42.
11. Carson, R. T., R. C. Mitchell, W. M. Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, S. Presser, P. A. Ruud. 1992. A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, CA.
12. Chow, C. C., R. K. Sarin. 2001. Comparative ignorance and the Ellsberg paradox. J, Risk Uncertainty 22 129-139.
13. Cohen, M., J.-Y. Jaffray, T. Said. 1987. Experimental comparisons of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 39 1-22.
14. Di Mauro, C., A. Maffioletti. 2002. The valuation of insurance under uncertainty: Does information matter? Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 26 195-224.
15. Dobbs, I. M. 1991. A Bayesian approach to decision-making under ambiguity. Economica 58 417-440.
16. Donkers, A. C. D., B. Melenberg, A. H. O. van Soest. 2001. Estimating risk attitudes using lotteries; a large sample approach. J. Risk Uncertainty 22 165-195.
17. Einhorn, H. J., R. M. Hogarth. 1986. Decision making under ambiguity. J, Bus. 59 S225-S250.
18. Ellsberg, D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75 643-669.
19. Elster, J. 1998. Emotions and economic theory. J. Econom. Literature 36 47-74.
20. Finkelstein, A. 2004. The interaction of partial public insurance programs and residual private insurance markets: Evidence from the US medicare program. J. Health Econom. 23 1-24.
21. Fischer, G. W., M. S. Kamlet, S. E. Fienberg, D. A. Schkade. 1986. Risk preferences for gains and losses in multiple objective decision making. Management Sci. 32 1065-1086.
22. Fox, C. R., A. Tversky. 1995. Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quart. J. Econom. 110 585-603.
23. Fox, C. R., A. Tversky. 1998. A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Sci. 44 879-895.
24. Fox, C. R., M. Weber. 2002. Ambiguity aversion, comparative ignorance, and decision context. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 88 476-498.
25. Frey, B. S., R. Jegen. 2001. Motivation crowding theory: A survey of empirical evidence. J. Econom. Surveys 15 589-611.
26. Gilboa, I., ed. 2004. Uncertainty in Economic Theory: Essays in Honor of David Schmeidler's 65th Birthday. Routledge, London.
27. Goldsmith, R. W., N.-E. Sahlin. 1983. The role of second-order probabilities in decision making. P. C. Humphreys, O. Svenson, A. Vari, eds. Analysing and Aiding Decision Processes. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 455-467.
28. Gonzalez, R., G. Wu. 1999. On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. 38 129-166.
29. Harrison, G. W., J. A. List. 2004. Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42 1009-1055.
30. Harrison, G. W., M. I. Lau, E. E. Rutström. 2007. Estimating risk attitudes in Denmark: A field experiment. Scandinavian J. Econom. Forthcoming.
31. Hartog, J., A. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, N. Jonker. 2002. Linking measured risk aversion to individual characteristics. Kyklos 55 3-26.
32. Heath, C., A. Tversky. 1991. Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 4 5-28.
33. Hershey, J. C., P. J. H. Schoemaker. 1985. Probability versus certainty equivalence methods in utility measurement: Are they equivalent? Management Sci. 31 1213-1231.
34. Hershey, J. C., H. C. Kunreuther, P. J. H. Schoemaker. 1982. Sources of bias in assessment procedures for utility functions. Management Sci. 28 936-953.
35. Hertwig, R., A. Ortmann. 2001. Experimental practices in economics: A challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sci. 24 383-403.
36. Hirshleifer, J. 1971. The private and social value of information and the reward to incentive activity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 61 561-574.
37. Ho, J. L. Y., L. R. Keller, P. Keltyka. 2002. Effects of outcome and probabilistic ambiguity on managerial choices. J, Risk Uncertainty 24 47-74.
38. Hogarth, R. M., H. C. Kunreuther. 1985. Ambiguity and insurance decisions. Amer. Econom. Rev., Papers Proc. 75 386-390.
39. Hogarth, R. M., H. C. Kunreuther. 1989. Risk, ambiguity, and insurance. J. Risk Uncertainty 25-35.
40. Hsee, C. K., H. C. Kunreuther. 2000. The affection effect in insurance decisions. J. Risk Uncertainty 20 141-159.
41. Irwin, J. R., G. H. McClelland, W. D. Schulze. 1992. Hypothetical and real consequences in experimental auctions for insurance against low-probability risks. J. Behavioral Decision Making 5 107-116.
42. Kahn, B. E., R. K. Sarin. 1988. Modeling ambiguity in decisions under uncertainty. J. Consumer Res. 15 265-272.
43. Kahneman, D., A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 263-291.
44. Keren, G. B., L. E. M. Gerritsen. 1999. On the robustness and possible accounts of ambiguity aversion. Acta Psychologica 103 149-172.
45. Keynes, J. M. 1921. A Treatise on Probability. McMillan, London.
46. Kilka, M., M. Weber. 2001. What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty? Management Sci. 47 1712-1726.
47. Klayman, J. 1995. Varieties of confirmation bias. Psych. Learn. 32 385-418.
48. Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Houghton Mifflin, New York.
49. Köbberling, V., C. Schwieren, P. P. Wakker. 2007. Prospect-theory's diminishing sensitivity versus economics' intrinsic utility of money: How the introduction of the Euro can be used to disentangle the two empirically. Theory Decision. Forthcoming.
50. Langer, T., M. Weber. 2001. Prospect theory, mental accounting, and differences in aggregated and segregated evaluation of lottery portfolios. Management Sci. 47 716-733.
51. MacCallum, R. C., S. Zhang, K. J. Preacher, D. D. Rucker. 2002. On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psych. Methods 119-40.
52. Mangelsdorff, L., M. Weber. 1994. Testing Choquet expected utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 25 437-457.
53. Manning, W. G., J. P. Newhouse, N. Duan, E. B. Keeler, A. Leibowitz, M. S. Marquis. 1987. Health insurance and the demand for medical care: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 77 251-277.
54. Marquis, M. S., M. R. Holmer. 1996. Alternative models of choice under uncertainty and demand for health insurance. Rev. Econom. Statist. 78 421-427.
55. McClelland, G. H., W. D. Schulze, D. L. Coursey. 1993. Insurance for low-probability hazards: A bimodal response to unlikely events. J. Risk Uncertainty 7 95-116.
56. McFadden, D. L. 2006. Free markets and fettered consumers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96 5-29.
57. Nunnally, J. C., I. H. Bernstein. 1994. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
58. Payne, J. W., D. J. Laughhunn, R. L. Crum. 1980. Translation of gambles and aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Sci. 26 1039-1060.
59. Pennings, J. M. E., A. Smidts. 2003. The shape of utility functions and organizational behavior. Management Sci. 49 1251-1263.
60. Rothschild, M., J. E. Stiglitz. 1976. Equilibrium in competitive markets. Quart. J. Econom. 90 629-649.
61. Shapira, Z., I. Venezia. 1999. Experimental tests of self-selection and screening in insurance decisions. Geneva Papers in Risk and Insurance Theory 24 139-158.
62. Smith, V. L. 1982. Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72 923-955.
63. Starmer, C. 2000. Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. J. Econom. Literature 38 332-382.
64. Starmer, C., R. Sugden. 1993. Testing for juxtaposition and eventsplitting effects. J. Risk Uncertainty 6 235-254.
65. Suen, W. 2004. The self-perpetuation of biased beliefs. Econom. J. 114 377-396.
66. Tversky, A., C. R. Fox. 1995. Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. 102 269-283.
67. Tversky, A., D. Kahneman. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5 297-323.
68. Viscusi, W. K., H. Chesson. 1999. Hopes and fears: The conflicting effects of risk ambiguity. Theory Decision 47 153-178.
69. Viscusi, W. K., W. A. Magat. 1992. Bayesian decisions with ambiguous belief aversion. J. Risk Uncertainty 5 371-387.
70. Vistnes, J. P., J. S. Banthin. 1997/98. The demand for Medicare supplemental insurance benefits: The role of attitudes toward medical care and risk. Inquiry 34 311-324.
71. Wakker, P. P. 2004. On the composition of risk preference and belief. Psych. Rev. 111 236-241.
72. Weber, M., F. Eisenführ, D. von Winterfeldt. 1988. The effects of splitting attributes on weights in multiattribute utility measurement. Management Sci. 34 431-445.
73. Winter, J., R. Balza, F. Caro, F. Heiss, B.-H. Jun, R. Matzkin, D. McFadden. 2006. Medicare prescription drug coverage: Consumer information and preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 7929-7934.