A framework for understanding cancer comparative effectiveness research data needs

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 65, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1150-1158

  Carpenter, William R ^a,b   Meyer, Anne Marie ^b   Abernethy, Amy P ^c,d   Stürmer, Til ^a,b   Kosorok, Michael R ^a,b  

^a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d DUKE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Comparative effectiveness research; Data models; Non experimental data; Outcomes; Registries; Research methods; Secondary data

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER CENTER; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER RESEARCH; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NEOPLASMS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REGISTRIES; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY;

EID: 84866839889     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. P. Sullivan, and D. Goldmann The promise of comparative effectiveness research JAMA 305 2011 400 401
2. C.M. Clancy, and J.R. Slutsky Commentary: a progress report on AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program. (AHRQ Update) Health Serv Res 42 2007 xi-xix(9)
3. S. Smith Preface Med Care 45 10 Suppl. 2 2007 S1 S2
4. P.B. Bach Limits on Medicare's ability to control rising spending on cancer drugs N Engl J Med 360 2009 626 633
5. Institute of Medicine Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research 2009 National Academies Press Washington, DC
6. Congressional Budget Office. Research on the comparative effectiveness of medical treatments: issues and options for an expanded federal role. Pub. No. 2975. Washington, DC: 2007.
7. N.A. Dreyer, S.R. Tunis, M. Berger, D. Ollendorf, P. Mattox, and R. Gliklich Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research Health Aff (Millwood) 29 2010 1818 1825
8. L.M. Etheredge Medicare's future: cancer care Health Aff (Millwood) 28 2009 148 159
9. M.E. Tinetti, and S.A. Studenski Comparative effectiveness research and patients with multiple chronic conditions N Engl J Med 364 2011 2478 2481
10. V. Fung, R.J. Brand, J.P. Newhouse, and J. Hsu Using medicare data for comparative effectiveness research: opportunities and challenges Am J Manag Care 17 2011 488 496
11. S. Keyhani, M. Woodward, and A.D. Federman Physician views on the use of comparative effectiveness research: a national survey Ann Intern Med 153 2010 551 552
12. H.C. Sox Comparative effectiveness research: a progress report Ann Intern Med 153 2010 469 472
13. N.A. Dreyer Making observational studies count: shaping the future of comparative effectiveness research Epidemiology 22 2011 295 297
14. H.C. Sox Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right Med Care 48 6 Suppl. 2010 S7 S8
15. K.N. Lohr Comparative effectiveness research methods: symposium overview and summary Med Care 48 6 Suppl. 2010 S3 S6
16. Outcome Sciences Registry of Patient Registries (RoPR) Available at http://www.outcome.com/ropr.htm 2010 Accessed January 27, 2011
17. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 9. Registry of Patient Registries. Recovery Act Awards for data infrastructure 2010. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/fund/recoveryawards/osawinfra.htm. Accessed February 6, 2011.
18. L. Aday, C. Begley, D. Lairson, and R. Balkrishnan Evaluating the healthcare system: effectiveness, efficiency, and equity 3rd ed. 2004 Health Administration Press Chicago, IL
19. I. McDowell Measuring health 3rd ed. 2006 Oxford University Press New York, NY
20. J. Lipscomb, C. Gotay, and C. Snyder Outcomes assessment in cancer: measures, methods, and applications 2005 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
21. National Cancer Policy Board of the Institute of Medicine Ensuring quality cancer care 1999 National Academies Press Washington, DC
22. National Cancer Policy Board of the Institute of Medicine Assessing the quality of cancer care: an approach to measurement in Georgia 2005 National Academies Press Washington, DC
23. National Cancer Policy Board of the Institute of Medicine Enhancing data systems to improve the quality of cancer care 2000 National Academies Press Washington, DC
24. J.G. Zapka, S.H. Taplin, L.I. Solberg, and M.M. Manos A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12 2003 4 13
25. N.R. Shah, and W.F. Stewart Clinical effectiveness: leadership in comparative effectiveness and translational research. The 15th Annual HMO Research Network Conference, April 26-29, 2009, Danville, Pennsylvania Clin Med Res 8 2010 28 29
26. E.J. Aiello Bowles, L. Tuzzio, D.P. Ritzwoller, Andrew Williams, Tyler Ross, and Edward H. Wagner Accuracy and complexities of using automated clinical data for capturing chemotherapy administrations: implications for future research Med Care 47 2009 1091 1097
27. H.C. Sox, and S. Greenfield Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine Ann Intern Med 151 2009 203 205
28. A. Hoffman, and S.D. Pearson 'Marginal medicine': targeting comparative effectiveness research to reduce waste Health Aff (Millwood) 28 2009 w710 w718
29. A. Donabedian Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966 Milbank Q 83 2005 691 729
30. J.S. Mandelblatt, P.A. Ganz, and K.L. Kahn Proposed agenda for the measurement of quality-of-care outcomes in oncology practice J Clin Oncol 17 1999 2614 2622
31. M.A. Brookhart, T. Sturmer, R.J. Glynn, J. Rassen, and S. Schneeweiss Confounding control in healthcare database research: challenges and potential approaches Med Care 48 6 Suppl 2010 S114 S120
32. M. Bloomrosen, and D. Detmer Advancing the framework: use of health data-a report of a working conference of the American Medical Informatics Association J Am Med Inform Assoc 15 2008 715 722
33. M. Bloomrosen, and D.E. Detmer Informatics, evidence-based care, and research; implications for national policy: a report of an American Medical Informatics Association health policy conference J Am Med Inform Assoc 17 2010 115 123
34. F.J. Manion, R.J. Robbins, W.A. Weems, and R.S. Crowley Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 9 2009 31
35. C. Safran, M. Bloomrosen, W.E. Hammond, S. Labkoff, S. Markel-Fox, and P.C. Tang Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association White Paper J Am Med Inform Assoc 14 2007 1 9
36. P.J. Wallace Reshaping cancer learning through the use of health information technology Health Aff (Millwood) 26 2007 w169 w177
37. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Effective health care program: what is comparative effectiveness research. Available at http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/what-is-comparative- effectiveness-research1/. Accessed May 29, 2010.
38. S.R. Smith Advancing methods for comparative effectiveness research Med Care 48 6 Suppl 2010 S1 S2
39. J.M. Geraci, C.P. Escalante, J.L. Freeman, and J.S. Goodwin Comorbid disease and cancer: the need for more relevant conceptual models in health services research J Clin Oncol 23 2005 7399 7404
40. D. Moher, S. Hopewell, K.F. Schulz, V. Montori, P.C. Gotzsche, and P.J. Devereaux CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 e1 e37
41. A.M. Meyer, W.R. Carpenter, A.P. Abernethy, T. Sturmer, and M.R. Kosorok Data for cancer comparative effectiveness research: past, present, and future potential Cancer 2012 10.1002/cncr.27552 Epub ahead of print
42. F. Mullan Seasons of survival: reflections of a physician with cancer N Engl J Med 313 1985 270 273
43. P.A. Ganz Cancer survivorship: today and tomorrow 2007 Springer New York, NY
44. A. Lievre, J.B. Bachet, V. Boige, A. Cayre, D. Le Corre, and E. Buc KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab J Clin Oncol 26 2008 374 379
45. A. Lievre, J.B. Bachet, D. Le Corre, V. Boige, B. Landi, and J.F. Emile KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer Cancer Res 66 2006 3992 3995
46. T. Salz, M. Weinberger, J.Z. Ayanian, N.T. Brewer, C.C. Earle, and J. Elston Lafata Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States BMC Health Serv Res 10 2010 256
47. K. Miller, B. Merry, and J. Miller Seasons of survivorship revisited Cancer J 14 2008 369 374
48. E. Basch, and A.P. Abernethy Supporting clinical practice decisions with real-time patient-reported outcomes J Clin Oncol 29 2011 954 956
49. E. Basch, X. Jia, G. Heller, A. Barz, L. Sit, and M. Fruscione Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: relationships with clinical outcomes J Natl Cancer Inst 101 2009 1624 1632
50. A. Donabedian Evaluating the quality of medical care Milbank Mem Fund Q 44 Suppl 1966 166 206
51. A. Donabedian The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 260 1988 1743 1748
52. M.R. Cooperberg, J.D. Birkmeyer, and M.S. Litwin Defining high quality health care Urol Oncol 27 2009 411 416
53. D.R. Wilke, M. Krahn, G. Tomlinson, A. Bezjak, R. Rutledge, and P. Warde Sex or survival: short-term versus long-term androgen deprivation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy Cancer 116 2010 1909 1917
54. P.A. Singer, E.S. Tasch, C. Stocking, S. Rubin, M. Siegler, and R. Weichselbaum Sex or survival: trade-offs between quality and quantity of life J Clin Oncol 9 1991 328 334
55. National Cancer Institute. Cancer research network. 2012. Available at http://crn.cancer.gov/. Accessed May 1, 2012.
56. J.Z. Ayanian, E.A. Chrischilles, R.H. Fletcher, M.N. Fouad, D.P. Harrington, and K.L. Kahn Understanding cancer treatment and outcomes: the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium J Clin Oncol 22 2004 2992 2996
57. Women's Health Initiative. Women's health initiative scientific resources website. 2012. Available at https://cleo.whi.org/SitePages/Home.aspx. Accessed May 7, 2012.
58. J. Maro, R. Platt, J. Holmes, B.L. Strom, S. Hennessy, and R. Lazarus Design of a national distributed health data network Ann Intern Med 151 2009 341 344
59. W. Pace, M. Cifuentes, R. Valuck, and E. Staton An electronic practice-based network for observational comparative effectiveness research Ann Intern Med 151 2009 338 340
60. D.M. Berwick Launching accountable care organizations - the proposed rule for the Medicare shared savings program N Engl J Med 364 2011 e32
61. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Shared savings program. 2011. Available at http://www.cms.gov/sharedsavingsprogram/. Accessed April 12, 2011.
62. Institute of Medicine A foundation for evidence-driven practice: a rapid learning system for cancer care 2010 National Academies Press Washington, DC
63. A.P. Abernethy, L.M. Etheredge, P.A. Ganz, P. Wallace, R.R. German, and C. Neti Rapid-learning system for cancer care J Clin Oncol 28 2010 4268 4274
64. (ONC) Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Federal health information technology strategic plan 2011-2015. 2011. Available at http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/community/fed- health-it
65. C.J. Bradley, L. Penberthy, K.J. Devers, and D.J. Holden Health services research and data linkages: issues, methods, and directions for the future Health Serv Res 45 5 Pt 2 2010 1468 1488
66. M.J. Pentecost HIPAA and the law of unintended consequences J Am Coll Radiol 1 2004 164 165
67. K. Dracup, and C.W. Bryan-Brown The law of unintended consequences Am J Crit Care 13 2004 97 99
68. J. Kulynych, and D. Korn The new HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) Medical Privacy Rule: help or hindrance for clinical research? Circulation 108 2003 912 914
69. D.N. Salem, and S.G. Pauker The adverse effects of HIPAA on patient care N Engl J Med 349 2003 309
70. J. Kulynych, and D. Korn The new federal medical-privacy rule N Engl J Med 347 2002 1133 1134
71. T.J. Beebe, J.Y. Ziegenfuss, J.L. St Sauver, S.M. Jenkins, L. Haas, and M.E. Davern Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization and survey nonresponse bias Med Care 49 2011 365 370
72. Institute of Medicine Beyond the HIPAA privacy rule: enhancing privacy, improving health through research 2009 National Academies Press Washington, DC
73. B.R. Hirsch, R.B. Giffin, L.C. Esmail, S.R. Tunis, A.P. Abernethy, and S.B. Murphy Informatics in action: lessons learned in comparative effectiveness research Cancer J 17 2011 235 238
74. T. Sturmer, K.J. Rothman, J. Avorn, and R.J. Glynn Treatment effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding: dealing with observations in the tails of the propensity score distribution-a simulation study Am J Epidemiol 172 2010 843 854
75. M.A. Brookhart, P.S. Wang, D.H. Solomon, and S. Schneeweiss Instrumental variable analysis of secondary pharmacoepidemiologic data Epidemiology 17 2006 373 374
76. T. Burke The health information technology provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: implications for public health policy and practice Public Health Rep 125 2010 141 145
77. M.M. Goldstein The health privacy provisions in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: implications for public health policy and practice Public Health Rep 125 2010 343 349
78. L.M. Lee, and L.O. Gostin Ethical collection, storage, and use of public health data: a proposal for a national privacy protection JAMA 302 2009 82 84
79. L.M. Etheredge Creating a high-performance system for comparative effectiveness research Health Aff (Millwood) 29 2010 1761 1767