Comparative effectiveness research: A progress report

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 153, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 469-472

  Sox, Harold C ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNDING; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; UNITED STATES; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; HUMANS; INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (U.S.); NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); UNITED STATES;

EID: 78349236197     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-7-201010050-00269     Document Type: Short Survey

References (14)

1. Patient Protection Affordable Care Act. 2010;1648-1694. Accessed at http://democrats.senate.gov/reform/patient-protection-affordable-care-act.pdf on 5 July 2010.
2. Institute of Medicine. Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2009. Accessed at www.nap.edu/catalog/12648.html on 5 July 2010.
3. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and Congress. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. Accessed at www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/ cerannualrpt.pdf on 5 July 2010.
4. Horwitz RI, Singer BH, Makuch RW, Viscoli CM. Can treatment that is helpful on average be harmful to some patients? A study of the conflicting information needs of clinical inquiry and drug regulation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:395-400. [PMID: 8621989]
5. Detre K, Peduzzi P, Murphy M, Hultgren H, Thomsen J, Oberman A, et al. Effect of bypass surgery on survival in patients in low- and high-risk subgroups delineated by the use of simple clinical variables. Circulation. 1981;63:1329-38. [PMID: 6971716]
6. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1477-9. [PMID: 19321856]
7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Fact Sheets on Recovery Act Investments in Comparative Effectiveness Research. Accessed at www.ahrq.gov/fund/cerfactsheets/ on 5 July 2010.
8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Comparative Effectiveness Research Grant and ARRA Awards. Accessed at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/comparative- effectiveness-research-grant-and-arra-awards/ on 5 July 2010.
9. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. How Are Research Topics Chosen? Accessed at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/submit-a-suggestion-for-research/ how-are-research-topics-chosen/ on 25 July 2010.
10. Lauer MS, Collins FS. Using science to improve the nation's health system: NIH's commitment to comparative effectiveness research. JAMA. 2010;303:2182-3. [PMID: 20516419]
11. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools. Accessed at http://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm on 5 July 2010.
12. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Recovery Act Awards for Inventory and Evaluation Awards. Accessed at www.ahrq.gov/fund/recoveryawards/osawinv.htm on 28 July 2010.
13. Clancy C, Collins FS. Patient-centered outcomes research institute: the intersection of science and health care. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:37cm18. [PMID: 20574065]
14. VanLare JM, Conway PH, Sox HC. Five next steps for a new national program for comparative-effectiveness research. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:970-3. [PMID: 20164480]