Accounting for uncertainty in colonisation times: A novel approach to modelling the spatio-temporal dynamics of alien invasions using distribution data

Ecography

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 901-911

  Catterall, Stephen ^a   Cook, Alex R ^b,c   Marion, Glenn ^a   Butler, Adam ^a   Hulme, Philip E ^d  

^a BIOMATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c DUKE NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Singapore)

^d LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ALTITUDE; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COLONIZATION; DICOTYLEDON; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LOCAL EXTINCTION; MODEL VALIDATION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SPATIAL VARIATION; STOCHASTICITY; TEMPORAL VARIATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

UNITED KINGDOM;

HERACLEUM; HERACLEUM MANTEGAZZIANUM;

EID: 84866751465     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07190.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aikio S. et al. 2010. Herbarium records identify the role of long-distance spread in the spatial distribution of alien plants in New Zealand. J. Biogeogr. 37: 1740-1751.
2. Bierman S. M. et al. 2010. Bayesian image restoration models for combining expert knowledge on recording activity with species distribution data. Ecography 33: 451-460.
3. Braithwaite M. E. et al. 2006. Change in the British flora 1987-2004. - Botanical Society of the British Isles, London.
4. Chuine I. 2010. Why does phenology drive species distribution? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 3149-3160.
5. Collingham Y. C. et al. 2000. Predicting the spatial distribution of non-indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 13-27.
6. Cook A. et al. 2007a. Bayesian inference for the spatio-temporal invasion of alien species. Bull. Math. Biol. 69: 2005-2025.
7. Cook A. R. et al. 2007b. Estimation of multiple transmission rates for epidemics in heterogeneous populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104: 20392-20397.
8. Cook A. R. et al. 2008. Optimal observation times in experimental epidemic processes. Biometrics 64: 860-868.
9. DAISIE. 2009. Handbook of alien species in Europe. - Springer.
10. Elith J. and Leathwick J. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 677-697.
11. Elith J. et al. 2010. The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1: 330-342.
12. Engler R. and Guisan A. 2009. MIGCLIM: predicting plant distribution and dispersal in a changing climate. Divers. Distrib. 15: 590-601.
13. Gelman A. and Rubin D. B. 1992. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7: 457-472.
14. Gelman A. et al. 2004. Bayesian data analysis. - Chapman and Hall/CRC.
15. Gibson G. J. 1997. Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for fitting spatiotemporal stochastic models in plant epidemiology. Appl. Stat. 46: 215-233.
16. Gilks W. R. et al. (eds) 1996. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. - Chapman and Hall.
17. Haines-Young R. et al. 2003. Changing landscapes, habitats and vegetation diversity across Great Britain. J. Environ. Manage. 67: 267-281.
18. Hastings A. et al. 2005. The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecol. Lett. 8: 91-101.
19. Höhle M. et al. 2005. Inference in disease transmission experiments by using stochastic epidemic models. Appl. Stat. 54: 349-366.
20. Hulme P. E. 2009a. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalisation. J. Appl. Ecol. 46: 10-18.
21. Hulme P. E. 2009b. Relative roles of life-form, land use and climate in recent dynamics of alien plant distributions in the British Isles. Weed Res. 49: 19-28.
22. Hulme P. E. 2011. Consistent flowering response to global warming by European plants introduced into North America. Funct. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01899.x
23. Hulme P. E. et al. 2009. Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union? Science 324: 40-41.
24. Jeschke J. M. and Strayer D. L. 2008. Usefulness of bioclimatic models for studying climate change and invasive species. - In: Ostfeld R. S. and Schlesinger W. H. (eds), The year in ecology and conservation biology 2008. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Vol. 1134, pp. 1-24.
25. Kalbfleisch J. D. and Prentice R. L. 2002. The statistical analysis of failure time data. - Wiley.
26. Kolar C. and Lodge D. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 199-204.
27. Lemke D. et al. 2011. Distribution modelling of Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) invasion in the Cumberland Plateau and Mountain Region, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 262: 139-149.
28. Marion G. et al. 2007. Towards an integrated approach to stochastic process-based modelling: with applications to behaviour and spatio-temporal spread. - In: Swain D. L. et al. (eds), Redesigning animal agriculture. CABI, pp. 144-170.
29. Marion G. et al. 2010. Statistical aspects of biodiversity risk assessment. - In: Settele J. et al. (eds), Atlas of biodiversity risk. Pensoft, pp. 58-61.
30. Nathan R. 2005. Long-distance dispersal research: building a network of yellow brick roads. Divers. Distrib. 11: 125-130.
31. Nathan R. et al. 2003. Methods for estimating long-distance dispersal. Oikos 103: 261-273.
32. O'Neill P. D. 2010. Introduction and snapshot review: relating infectious disease transmission models to data. Stat. Med. 29: 2069-2077.
33. Pagendam D. E. and Pollett P. K. 2010. Locally optimal designs for the simple death process. J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 140: 3096-3105.
34. Pearson R. G. and Dawson T. P. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 361-371.
35. Pejchar L. and Mooney H. A. 2009. Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 497-504.
36. Peterson A. T. 2003. Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modelling. Q. Rev. Biol. 78: 419-433.
37. Pimentel D. et al. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52: 273-288.
38. Preston C. D. et al. 2002. New atlas of the British and Irish flora. - Oxford Univ. Press.
39. Pyšek P. and Hulme P. E. 2005. Spatio-temporal dynamics of plant invasions: linking pattern to process. Ecoscience 12: 302-315.
40. Settele J. et al. 2005. ALARM: assessing large-scale environmental risks for biodiversity with tested methods. Gaia 14: 69-72.
41. Tiley G. E. D. et al. 1996. Biological flora of the British Isles: Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier. J. Ecol. 84: 297-319.
42. Václavík T. and Meentemeyer R. K. 2009. Invasive species distribution modelling (iSDM): are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions? Ecol. Model. 220: 3248-3258.
43. Vilà M. et al. 2010. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European cross-taxa assessment. Front. Ecol. Environ. 8: 135-144.
44. Wadsworth R. A. et al. 2000. Simulating the spread and management of alien riparian weeds: are they out of control? J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 28-38.
45. Walker K. J. et al. 2010. Recording the British and Irish flora, 2010-2020. - Botanical Society of the British Isles, London.
46. Walther G.-R. et al. 2009. Alien species in a warmer world - risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 686-693.
47. Wiens J. A. et al. 2009. Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 19729-19736.
48. Williamson M. 1996. Biological invasions. - Chapman and Hall.
49. Willis S. G. and Hulme P. E. 2002. Does temperature limit the invasion of Impatiens glandulifera and Heracleum mantegazzianum in the UK?-Funct. Ecol. 16: 530-539.