Distribution modelling of Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) invasion in the Cumberland Plateau and Mountain Region, USA

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 262, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 139-149

  Lemke, D ^a,b   Hulme, P E ^c   Brown, J A ^a   Tadesse, W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b ALABAMA A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Biological invasions; Japanese honeysuckle; Logistic regression; Maximum entropy; Spatial modelling; Weed

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; MAXIMUM ENTROPY; SPATIAL MODELLING; WEED;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE MODELS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ENTROPY; FORECASTING; FORESTRY; LANDFORMS; PLANNING; PLANTS (BOTANY); POPULATION STATISTICS; RATING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DICOTYLEDON; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HUMAN ACTIVITY; LAND COVER; LOGISTICS; LONG-TERM CHANGE; MAXIMUM ENTROPY ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOLOGICAL POPULATIONS; DECISION MAKING; FORECASTS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; MOUNTAINS; PLANTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEASONAL VARIATION; USA; WEEDS;

APPALACHIAN PLATEAU; CUMBERLAND PLATEAU; UNITED STATES;

LONICERA JAPONICA;

EID: 79957552111     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Affre L., Suehs C.M., Charpentier S., Vilà M., Brundu G., Lambdon P., Traveset A., Hulme P.E. Consistency on the habitat degree of invasion for three invasive plant species across Mediterranean islands. Biological Invasions 2010, 12:2537-2548.
2. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974, 19:716-723.
3. Anderson, J.R., Hardy, E.E., Roach, J.T., Witmer, R.E., 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 964, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
4. Araújo M.B., New M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2007, 22:42-47.
5. Avon C., Bergès L., Dumas Y., Dupouey J.L. Does the effect of forest roads extend a few meters or more into the adjacent forest? A study on understory plant diversity in managed oak stands. Forest Ecology and Management 2010, 259:1546-1555.
6. Baars R., Kelly D. Survival and growth responses of native and introduced vines in New Zealand to light availability. New Zealand Journal of Botany 1996, 34:389-400.
7. Barbosa A.M., Real R., Mario Vargas J. Transferability of environmental favourability models in geographic space: the case of the Iberian desman (Galemys pyrenaicus) in Portugal and Spain. Ecological Modelling 2009, 220:747-754.
8. Barden L.S., Matthews J.F. Change in abundance of honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) and other ground flora after prescribed burning of a piedmont pine forest. Castanea 1980, 45:257-260.
9. Bartuszevige A., Gorchov D. Avian seed dispersal of an invasive shrub. Biological Invasions 2006, 8:1013-1022.
10. Bell D.J., Forseth I.N., Teramura A.Z. Field water relations of three temperate vines. Oecologia 1988, 74:537-545.
11. Birdsey, R.A., Schreuder, H.T., 1992. An overview of forest inventory and analysis estimation procedures in the eastern United States - with an emphasis on the components of change. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-214.
12. Byers J.E., Reichard S., Randall J.M., Parker I.M., Smith C.S., Lonsdale W.M., Atkinson I.A.E., Seastedt T.R., Williamson M., Chornesky E., Hayes D. Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species. Conservation Biology 2002, 16:630-640.
13. Cadenasso M.L., Pickett S.T.A. Effect of edge structure on the flux of species into forest interiors. Conservation Biology 2001, 15:91-97.
14. Cain M.D. The influence of woody and herbaceous competition on early growth of naturally regenerated loblolly and shortleaf pines. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 1991, 15:179-185.
15. Collingham Y.C., Wadsworth R.A., Huntley B., Hulme P.E. Predicting the spatial distribution of non-indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent. Journal of Applied Ecology 2000, 37:13-27.
16. Coppin P., Jonckheere I., Nackaerts K., Muys B., Lambin E. Review Article digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2004, 25:1565-1596.
17. Dale V., Lannom K., Tharp M., Hodges D., Fogel J. Effects of climate change, land-use change, and invasive species on the ecology of the Cumberland forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2009, 39:467-480.
18. D'Antonio C.M., Jackson N.E., Horvitz C.C., Hedberg R. Invasive plants in wildland ecosystems: merging the study of invasion processes with management needs. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2004, 2:513-521.
19. Davison S.E., Forman R.T.T. Herb and shrub dynamics in a mature oak forest: a thirty-year study. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 1982, 109:64-73.
20. Dickson J.G., Segelquist C.A., Rogers M.J. Establishment of Japanese honeysuckle in the Ozark Mountains. Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 242-245. Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 1978.
21. Ducheyne E.I., De Wulf R.R., De Baets B. A spatial approach to forest-management optimization: linking GIS and multiple objective genetic algorithms. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2006, 20:917-928.
22. Dullinger S., Kleinbauer I., Peterseil J., Smolik M., Essl F. Niche based distribution modelling of an invasive alien plant: effects of population status, propagule pressure and invasion history. Biological Invasions 2009, 11:2401-2414.
23. Dyess J.G., Causey M.K., Striblin H.L., Lockaby B.G. Effects of fertilization on production and quality of Japanese honeysuckle. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 1994, 18:68-71.
24. ERDAS Inc., 2008. Imagine 9.2, 5051 Peachtree Corners Circle, Norcross, GA.
25. ESRI, 2009. ArcGIS, Redlands, CA, USA, Environmental Systems Research Institute.
26. Gesch D., Oimoen M., Greenlee S., Nelson C., Steuck M., Tyler D. The national elevation dataset. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2002, 68:5-11.
27. Guisan A., Weiss S.B., Weiss A.D. GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution. Plant Ecology 1999, 143:107-122.
28. Gutirrez D., Fernndez P., Seymour A.S., Jordano D. Habitat distribution models: are mutualist distributions good predictors of their associates?. Ecological Applications 2005, 15:3-18.
29. Hardt R.A. Japanese honeysuckle: from " one of the best" to ruthless pest. Arnoldia 1986, 46:27-34.
30. Hawkes C.V., Wren I.F., Herman D.J., Firestone M.K. Plant invasion alters nitrogen cycling by modifying the soil nitrifying community. Ecology Letters 2005, 8:976-985.
31. Healey S.P., Cohen W.B., Zhiqiang Y., Krankina O.N. Comparison of Tasseled Cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 97:301-310.
32. Hellmann J.J., Byers J.E., Bierwagen B.G., Dukes J.S. Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conservation Biology 2008, 22:534-543.
33. Hoffman J.D., Narumalani S., Mishra D.R., Merani P., Wilson R.G. Predicting potential occurrence and spread of invasive plant species along the North Platte River, Nebraska. Invasive Plant Science 2008, 1:359-367.
34. Homer C., Huang C.Q., Yang L.M., Wylie B., Coan M. Development of a 2001 national land-cover database for the United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2004, 70:829-840.
35. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression 2000, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
36. Hulme P.E. Biological invasions: winning the science battles but losing the conservation war?. Oryx 2003, 37:178-193.
37. Huang C., Wylie B., Yang L., Homer C., Zylstra G. Derivation of a tasselled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2002, 23:1741-1748.
38. Hulme P.E. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalisation. Journal of Applied Ecology 2009, 46:10-18.
39. Hulme P.E, Pysek P., Nentwig W., Vila M. Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union?. Science 2009, 324:40-41.
40. Jiménez-Valverde A., Lobo J.M. The ghost of unbalanced species distribution data in geographical model predictions. Diversity and Distributions 2006, 12:521-524.
41. Jonathan L.G., Jayne B. Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conservation Biology 2003, 17:420-432.
42. Kauth, R. J., and G. S. Thomas. 1976. The tasseled cap --a graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen in Landsat. Pages 41-51 in Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data,. LARS, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
43. Kumar S., Stohlgren T.J., Chong G.W. Spatial heterogeneity influences native and nonnative plant species richness. Ecology 2006, 87:3186-3199.
44. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:157-174.
45. Larson K.C., Fowler S.P., Walker J.C. Lack of pollinators limits fruit set in the exotic Lonicera japonica. American Midland Naturalist 2002, 148:54-60.
46. Leatherman, A.D., 1955. Ecological life-history of Lonicera japonica Thunb. Dissertation. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
47. Liu C., Berry P.M., Dawson T.P., Pearson R.G. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 2005, 28:385-393.
48. Lobo J.M., Jiménez-Valverde A., Real R. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2008, 17:145-151.
49. Lunetta R.S., Elvidge C.D. Remote Sensing Change Detection 1998, Ann Arbor Press, MI.
50. Manel S., Williams H.C., Ormerod S.J. Evaluating presence/absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. Journal of Applied Ecology 2001, 38:921-931.
51. Martin M., Tipping P., Sickman J. Invasion by an exotic tree alters above and belowground ecosystem components. Biological Invasions 2009, 11:1883-1894.
52. McGrath D.A., Evans J.P., Smith C.K., Haskell D.G., Pelkey N.W., Gottfried R.R., Brockett C.D. Mapping land-use change and monitoring the impacts of hardwood to pine conversion on the Southern Cumberland Plateau in Tennessee. Earth Interactions 2004, 8:1-24.
53. Melbourne B.A., Cornell H.V., Davies K.F., Dugaw C.J., Elmendorf S., Freestone A.L., Hall R.J., Harrison S., Hastings A., Holland M., Holyoak M., Lambrinos J., Moore K., Yokomizo H. Invasion in a heterogeneous world: resistance, coexistence or hostile takeover?. Ecology Letters 2007, 10:77-94.
54. Merriam R.W. The abundance, distribution and edge associations of six non-indigenous, harmful plants across North Carolina. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 2003, 130:283-291.
55. Munger, G.T., 2002. Lonicera japonica. In: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Fire Effects Information System. , 43 p. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/vine/lonjap/all.html.
56. Myers J.H., Bazely D.R. Ecology and Control of Introduced Plants 2003, Cambridge University.
57. Ohwi J. Flora of Japan 1965, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
58. Patterson D. The history and distribution of five exotic weeds in North Carolina. Southern Appalachian Botanical Society 1976, 41:177-180.
59. Peterson A.T. Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. Quarterly Review of Biology 2003, 78:419-433.
60. Phillips S.J., Anderson R.P., Schapire R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 2006, 190:231-259.
61. Piedallu C., Gégout J. Efficient assessment of topographic solar radiation to improve plant distribution models. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2008, 148:1696-1706.
62. Pimentel D., Zuniga R., Morrison D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 2005, 52:273-288.
63. PRISM Group, 2008. http://www.prismclimate.org/.
64. Pyšek P., Bacher S., Chytrý M., Jarošík V., Wild J., Celesti-Grapow L., Gasso N., Kenis M., Lambdon P.W., Nentwig W., Pergl J., Roques A., Sádlo J., Solarz W., Vilà M., Hulme P.E. Contrasting patterns in the invasions of European terrestrial and freshwater habitats by alien plants, insects and vertebrates. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2010, 19:317-331.
65. Regehr D.L. Selective control of Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica). Weed Technology 1988, 2:139-143.
66. Reinhart K.O., Greene E., Callaway R.M. Effects of Acer platanoides invasion on understory plant communities and tree regeneration in the northern Rocky Mountains. Ecography 2005, 28:573-582.
67. Ricciardi A. Are modern biological invasions an unprecedented form of global change?. Conservation Biology 2007, 21:329-336.
68. Ricketts T.H., Dinerstein E., Olson D.M., Loucks C.J., Eichbaum W. Terrestrial Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment 1999, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
69. Robertson M.P., Villet M.H., Palmer A.R. A fuzzy classification technique for predicting species' distributions: applications using invasive alien plants and indigenous insects. Diversity and Distributions 2004, 10:461-474.
70. Rose N.A., Burton P.J. Using bioclimatic envelopes to identify temporal corridors in support of conservation planning in a changing climate. Forest Ecology and Management 2009, 258:S64-S74.
71. Ross L.C., Lambdon P.W., Hulme P.E. Disentangling the roles of climate, propagule pressure and land use on the current and potential elevational distribution of the invasive weed Oxalis pes-caprae L. on crete. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2008, 10:251-258.
72. SAS Institute, 2009. SAS 9.2, Cary, NC.
73. 2 enrichment and climatic change for the geographical distribution of two introduced vines in the U.S.A. Climatic Change 1990, 16:31-51.
74. Schierenbeck K.A. Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) as an invasive species; history, ecology, and context. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 2004, 23:391-400.
75. Schweitzer J.A., Larson K.C. Greater morphological plasticity of exotic honeysuckle species may make them better invaders than native species. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 1999, 126:15-23.
76. Smalley, G.W., 1979. Classification and evaluation of forest sites on the Southern Cumberland Plateau. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-23. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA, 59 p.
77. Smalley, G.W., 1982. Classification and evaluation of forest sites on the Mid-Cumberland Plateau. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-38. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA, 58 p.
78. Smalley, G.W., 1984. Classification and evaluation of forest sites in the Cumberland Mountains. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-50. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA, 84 p.
79. Smalley, G.W., 1986. Classification and evaluation of forest sites on the Northern Cumberland Plateau. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-60. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA, 74 p.
80. Standish R.J., Robertson A.W., Williams P.A. The impact of an invasive weed Tradescantia fluminensis on native forest regeneration. Journal of Applied Ecology 2001, 38:1253-1263.
81. Stohlgren T.J., Binkley D., Chong G.W., Kalkhan M.A., Schell L.D., Bull K.A., Otsuki Y., Newman G., Bashkin M., Son Y. Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecological Monographs 1999, 69:25-46.
82. Stohlgren T.J., Chong G.W., Schell L.D., Rimar K.A., Otsuki Y., Lee M., Kalkhan M.A., Villa C.A. Assessing vulnerability to invasion by nonnative plant species at multiple spatial scales. Environmental Management 2002, 29:566-577.
83. Stohlgren T.J., Ma P., Kumar S., Rocca M., Morisette J.T., Jarnevich C.S., Benson N. Ensemble habitat mapping of invasive plant species. Risk Analysis 2010, 30:224-235.
84. Swenson U., Stuessy T.F., Baeza M., Crawford D.J. New and historical plant introductions, and potential pests in the Juan Fernández Islands, Chile. Pacific Science 1997, 51:223-253.
85. Timmins S.M., Williams P.A. Weed numbers in New Zealand's forests and scrub reserves. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 1991, 15:153-162.
86. Truscott A.M., Palmer S.C.F., Soulsby C., Hulme P.E. Assessing the vulnerability of riparian vegetation to invasion by Mimulus guttatus: relative importance of biotic and abiotic variables in determining species occurrence, abundance and performance. Diversity and Distributions 2008, 14:412-421.
87. Tucker C.J. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing and the Environment 1979, 8:127-150.
88. Underwood E.C., Klinger R., Moore P.E. Predicting patterns of non-native plant invasions in Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Diversity and Distributions 2004, 10:447-459.
89. USBOC, 2000. United States Bureau of the Census - Tiger Files, Geography Division.
90. USDA, 2005. Forest Inventory and Analysis National Core Field Guide, Volume 1: Field Data Collection Procedures for Phase 2 Plots, Version 1.5. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis, Washington Office. Internal Report.
91. USDA, 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. USDA, Washington, D.C.
92. USDA, 2009. PLANTS National Plants Database. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge. http://plants.usda.gov/.
93. USDA/FS, 2007. The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database Description and Users Guide Version 3.0. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office.
94. Václavík T., Meentemeyer R.K. Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?. Ecological Modelling 2009, 220:3248-3258.
95. Vellend M. A pest and an invader: white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus Zimm.) as a seed dispersal agent for honeysuckle shrubs (Lonicera L.). Natural Areas Journal 2002, 22:230-234.
96. Vilà M., Basnou C., Pyšek P., Josefsson M., Genovesi P., Gollasch S., Nentwig W., Olenin S., Roques A., Roy D., Hulme P.E., DAISIE partners How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European cross-taxa assessment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2010, 8:135-144.
97. Vitousek P., D'Antonio C., Loope L., Rejmanek M., Westbrooks R. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 1997, 21:1-16.
98. Walther G.R., Roques A., Hulme P.E., Sykes M.T., Pysek P., Kuhn I., Zobel M., Bacher S., Botta-Dukat Z., Bugmann H., Czucz B., Dauber J., Hickler T., Jarosik V., Kenis M., Klotz S., Minchin D., Moora M., Nentwig W., Ott J., Panov V.E., Reineking B., Robinet C., Semenchenko V., Solarz W., Thuiller W., Vila M., Vohland K., Settele J. Alien species in a warmer world: Risks and opportunities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2009, 24:686-693.
99. Wear D.N., Greis J.G. Southern forest resource assessment: summary of findings. Journal of Forestry 2002, 100:6-14.
100. Webster C.R., Jenkins M.A., Jose S. Woody invaders and the challenges they pose to forest ecosystems in the Eastern United States. Journal of Forestry 2006, 104:366-374.
101. Williams P.A., Timmins S.M., Smith J.M.B., Downey P.O. The biology of Australian weeds 38, Lonicera japonica Thunb. Plant Protection Quarterly 2001, 16:90-100.
102. Willis S.G., Hulme P.E. Does temperature limit the invasion of Impatiens glandulifera and Heracleum mantegazzianum in the UK?. Functional Ecology 2002, 16:530-539.
103. With K.A., Crist T.O. Critical thresholds in species' responses to landscape structure. Ecology 1995, 76:2446-2459.
104. Yates E.D., Levia D.F., Williams C.L. Recruitment of three non-native invasive plants into a fragmented forest in southern Illinois. Forest Ecology and Management 2004, 190:119-130.