Sensory and decisional factors in motion-induced blindness

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2007, Pages

  Caetta, Florent ^a   Gorea, Andrei ^a   Bonneh, Yoram ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Decision criterion; Motion induced blindness; Sensitivity; Threshold versus contrast function

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLINDNESS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; BLINDNESS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34249311962     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.7.4     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Angelucci, A., Levitt, J. B., Walton, E. J., Hupe, J. M., Bullier, J., & Lund, J. S. (2002). Circuits for local and global signal integration in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 8633-8646. [PubMed] [Article]
2. Azzopardi, P., & Cowey, A. (1997). Is blindsight like normal, near-threshold vision? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 14190-14194. [PubMed] [Article]
3. Baloch, A. A., & Grossberg, S. (1997). A neural model of high-level motion processing: Line motion and formotion dynamics. Vision Research, 37, 3037-3059. [PubMed]
4. Bender, M. B. (1952). Disorders in perception. Spring-field, IL: Thomas.
5. Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145-167. [PubMed]
6. Blake, R., & Camisa, J. (1979). On the inhibitory nature of binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 315-323. [PubMed]
7. Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1974). Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression. Nature, 249, 488-490. [PubMed]
8. Blake, R., Sobel, K. V., & Gilroy, L. A. (2003). Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron, 39, 869-878. [PubMed] [Article]
9. Blake, R., Tadin, D., Sobel, K. V., Raissian, T. A., & Chong, S. C. (2006). Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 4783-4788. [PubMed] [Article]
10. Bonneh, Y. S., Cooperman, A., & Sagi, D. (2001). Motion-induced blindness in normal observers. Nature, 411, 798-801. [PubMed]
11. Bonneh, Y. S., Sagi, D., & Cooperman, A. (2005). Learning to ignore: Practice can increase disappearance in motion induced blindness [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5 (8):223, 223a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/223/, doi:10.1167/5.8.223.
12. Breitmeyer, B., Love, R., & Wepman, B. (1974). Contour suppression during stroboscopic motion and metacontrast. Vision Research, 14, 1451-1456. [PubMed]
13. Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ogmen, H. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1572-1595. [PubMed]
15. Campion, J., Latto, R., & Smith, Y. M. (1983). Is blindsight an effect of scattered light, spared cortex, and near-threshold vision? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 423-486.
16. Clarke, F. J. J., & Belcher, S. J. (1962). On the localization of Troxler's effect in the visual pathway. 53-68.
17. Cornsweet, T. N., & Teller, D. Y. (1965). Relation of increment thresholds to brightness and luminance. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 55, 1303-1308. [PubMed]
18. Critchley, M. (1949). The phenomenon of tactile inattention with special reference to parietal lesions. Brain, 72, 538-561.
19. Dealy, R. S., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1974). Is spatial adaptation an after-effect of prolonged inhibition? Journal of Physiology, 241, 261-270. [PubMed] [Article]
20. Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston & New York: Little, Brown.
21. Fechner, G. T. (1907). Elemente der Psychophysik I u. II. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hartel.
22. Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 1, 1-47. [PubMed] [Article]
23. Finkel, L. H., & Edelman, G. M. (1989). Integration of distributed cortical systems by reentry: A computer simulation of interactive functionally segregated visual areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 3188-3208. [PubMed] [Article]
24. Foley, J. M. (1994). Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: Masking experiments require a new model. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, image science, and vision, 11, 1710-1719. [PubMed]
25. Foley, J. M., & Chen, C. C. (1997). Analysis of the effect of pattern adaptation on pattern pedestal effects: A two-process model. Vision Research, 37, 2779-2788. [PubMed]
26. Foley, J. M., & Legge, G. E. (1981). Contrast detection and near threshold discrimination in human vision. Vision Research, 21, 1041-1053. [PubMed]
27. Fox, R., & Check, R. (1972). Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 283-289. [PubMed]
28. Funk, A. P., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2003). Does interhemispheric competition mediate motion-induced blindness? A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Perception, 32, 1328-1338. [PubMed]
29. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25. [PubMed]
30. Gorea, A., Caetta, F., & Sagi, D. (2005). Criteria interactions across visual attributes. Vision Research, 45, 2523-2532. [PubMed]
31. Gorea, A., & Fiorentini, A. (1982). Interactions orientationnelles entre des rÕseaux stationnaires et en mouvement. L' AnnÕe Psychologique, 82, 45-65.
32. Gorea, A., & Sagi, D. (2000). Failure to handle more than one internal representation in visual detection tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 12380-12384. [PubMed] [Article]
33. Gorea, A., & Sagi, D. (2001). Disentangling signal from noise in visual contrast discrimination. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1146-1150. [PubMed] [Article]
34. Gorea, A., & Sagi, D. (2002). Natural extinction: A criterion shift phenomenon. Visual Cognition, 9, 913-936.
35. Gorea, A., & Sagi, D. (2005). On decision and attention. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. K. Tsotsos (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 152-159). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
36. Graf, E. W., Adams, W. J., & Lages, M. (2002). Modulating motion-induced blindness with depth ordering and surface completion. Vision Research, 42, 2731-2735. [PubMed]
37. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory. New York: Wiley.
38. Grossberg, S., & Rudd, M. E. (1992). Cortical dynamics of visual motion perception: Short-range and longrange apparent motion. Psychological Review, 99, 78-121. [PubMed]
39. Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1993). The history and clinical presentation of neglect. In I. H. Robertson & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Unilateral neglect; clinical and experimental studies (pp. 3-26). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Henning, G. B., & Wichmann, F. A. (2007). Some observations on the pedestal effect. Journal of Vision, 7(1):3, 1-15, http://journalofvision.org/7/1/3/, doi:10.1167/7.1.3. [PubMed] [Article]
41. Hofstoetter, C., Koch, C., & Kiper, D. C. (2004). Motioninduced blindness does not affect the formation of negative afterimages. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 691-708. [PubMed]
42. Hood, D. C., & Finkelstein, M. A. (1986). Sensitivity to light. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol. I: Sensory processes and perception (pp. 5.3-5.6). New York: Academic Press.
43. Hsu, L. C., Yeh, S. L., & Kramer, P. (2004). Linking motion-induced blindness to perceptual filling-in. Vision Research, 44, 2857-2866. [PubMed]
44. Hsu, L. C., Yeh, S. L., & Kramer, P. (2006). A common mechanism for perceptual filling-in and motioninduced blindness. Vision Research, 46, 1973-1981. [PubMed]
45. Kanai, R., & Kamitani, Y. (2003). Time-locked perceptual fading induced by visual transients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 664-672. [PubMed]
46. Kanai, R., Moradi, F., Shimojo, S., & Verstraten, F. A. (2005). Perceptual alternation induced by visual transients. Perception, 34, 803-822. [PubMed]
47. Kanai, R., Paffen, C. L., Gerbino, W., & Verstraten, F. A. (2004). Blindness to inconsistent local signals in motion transparency from oscillating dots. Vision Research, 44, 2207-2212. [PubMed]
48. Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143. [PubMed]
49. Kastner, S., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1998). Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. Science, 282, 108-111. [PubMed]
50. Kawabe, T., Yamada, Y., & Miura, K. (in press). How an abrupt onset cue can release motion-induced blindness. Consciousness and Cognition. [PubMed]
51. Kim, C. Y., & Blake, R. (2005). Psychophysical magic: Rendering the visible 'invisible'. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 381-388. [PubMed]
52. Kingdom, F., & Moulden, B. (1991). A model for contrast discrimination with incremental and decremental test patches. Vision Research, 31, 851-858. [PubMed]
53. Klein, S. A. (1998). Double-judgment psychophysics for research on consciousness: Application to blindsight. In S. A. Hemeroff, A. W. Kaszniak, & A. C. Scott (Eds.), Toward a science of consciousness: II. The second Tucson discussions and debates (pp. 361-369). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.
55. Kohler, I. W. (1940). Dynamics in psychology. New York: Liveright.
56. Lankheet, M. J. (2006). Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. Journal of Vision, 6 (4):1, 304-310, http://journalofvision.org/6/4/1/, doi:10.1167/6.4.1. [PubMed] [Article]
57. Legge, G. E. (1981). A power law for contrast discrimination. Vision Research, 21, 457-467. [PubMed]
58. Legge, G. E., & Foley, J. M. (1980). Contrast masking in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 70, 1458-1470. [PubMed]
59. Levelt, W. J. M. (1965). On binocular rivalry. Assen, The Netherlands: Royal VanGorcum.
60. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 467-477. [PubMed]
61. Libedinsky, C., & Livingstone, M. (2006). Multi-level suppression during motion-induced blindness [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):301, 301a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/301/, doi:10.1167/ 6.6.301.
62. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. McGinnies, E. (1949). Emotionality and perceptual defense. Psychological Review, 56, 244-251.
65. Meese, T. S. (2004). Area summation and masking. Journal of Vision, 4(10):8, 930-943, http://journalofvision.org/4/10/8/, doi:10.1167/ 4.10.8. [PubMed] [Article]
66. Meese, T. S., & Holmes, D. J. (2002). Adaptation and gain pool summation: Alternative models and masking data. Vision Research, 42, 1113-1125. [PubMed]
67. Montaser-Kouhsari, L., Moradi, F., Zandvakili, A., & Esteky, H. (2004). Orientation-selective adaptation during motion-induced blindness. Perception, 33, 249-254. [PubMed]
68. Mueller, T. J., & Blake, R. (1989). A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry. Biological Cybernetics, 61, 223-232. [PubMed]
69. Nachmias, J., & Sansbury, R. V. (1974). Letter: Grating contrast: Discrimination may be better than detection. Vision Research, 14, 1039-1042. [PubMed]
70. Naka, K. I., & Rushton, W. A. (1966). S-potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae), Journal of Physiology, 185, 587-599. [PubMed] [Article]
71. Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Wenderoth, P. (2001). The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 348-360. [PubMed]
72. Ogmen, H., Breitmeyer, B. G., & Melvin, R. (2003). The what and where in visual masking. Vision Research, 43, 1337-1350. [PubMed]
73. Pelli, D. G. (1985). Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and image science, 2, 1508-1532. [PubMed]
74. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860. [PubMed]
75. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
76. Ricci, R., & Chatterjee, A. (2004). Sensory and response contributions to visual awareness in extinction. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 85-93. [PubMed]
77. Sanders, R. K. (1980). Binocular suppression during binocular rivalry and fusion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester.
78. Simons, D., Lleras, A., Martinez-Conde, S., Slichter, D., Caddigan, E., & Nevarez, G. (2006). Induced visual fading of complex images. Journal of Vision, 6(10):9, 1093-1101, http://journalofvision.org/ 6/10/9/, doi:10.1167/6.10.9. [PubMed] [Article]
79. Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153-181. [PubMed]
80. Stigler, R. (1910). Chronophotische Studien über den Umgebungskontrast [Effects of exposure duration and luminance on the contrast of the surround]. Pflügers Archiv für die Gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 134, 365-435.
81. Tong, F. (2001). Competing theories of binocular rivalry: A possible resolution. Brain and Mind, 2, 55-83.
82. Tononi, G., Sporns, O., & Edelman, G. M. (1992). Reentry and the problem of integrating multiple cortical areas: Simulation of dynamic integration in the visual system. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 310-335. [PubMed]
83. Trevarthen, C. B. (1968). Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychologische Forschung, 31, 299-348. [PubMed]
84. Troxler, D. (1804). Uber das Verschwindern gegebener Gegenstande innerhalb unsers Gesichtskrcises. In K. Himley & J. A. Schmidt (Eds.), Ophthalmologisches bibliothek (vol. II, pp. 51-53). Jena: Fromann.
85. Wales, R., & Fox, R. (1970). Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 90-94.
86. Watanabe, K., Paik, Y., & Blake, R. (2004). Preserved gain control for luminance contrast during binocular rivalry suppression. Vision Research, 44, 3065-3071. [PubMed]
87. Weiskrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
88. Weiskrantz, L. (1990). Outlooks for blindsight: Explicit methods for implicit processes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Bological Sciences, 239, 247-278. [PubMed]
89. Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision - Part the first. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 128, 371-394.
90. Whittle, P. (1986). Increments and decrements: Luminance discrimination. Vision Research, 26, 1677-1691. [PubMed]
91. Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., & Leopold, D. A. (2003). Generalized flash suppression of salient visual targets. Neuron, 39, 1043-1052. [PubMed] [Article]
92. Yantis, S., & Nakama, T. (1998). Visual interactions in the path of apparent motion. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 508-512. [PubMed]
93. Yu, C., Klein, S. A., & Levi, D. M. (2003). Cross- and isooriented surrounds modulate the contrast response function: The effect of surround contrast. Journal of Vision, 3(8):1, 527-540, http://journalofvision.org/3/8/1/, doi:10.1167/3.8.1. [PubMed] [Article]
94. Zeki, S.,& Shipp, S. (1988). The functional logic of cortical connections. Nature, 335, 311-317. [PubMed]