DNA repair: finding the perfect match;Réparation de l'ADN Comment trouver le bon partenaire ?

Medecine/Sciences

Volumn 28, Issue 8-9, 2012, Pages 714-716

  Miné Hattab, Judith ^a   Rothstein, Rodney ^a  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDONUCLEASE; FUNGAL DNA; POLYDEOXYRIBONUCLEOTIDE SYNTHASE; RAD51 PROTEIN; RAD51 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SAE2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHROMOSOME; CYTOLOGY; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; FORECASTING; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN; MOTION; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPAIR ENZYMES; DNA, FUNGAL; ENDONUCLEASES; FORECASTING; GENOME; HUMANS; MOTION; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID;

EID: 84866602252     PISSN: 07670974     EISSN: 19585381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/medsci/2012288014     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Agarwal S, Tafel AA, Kanaar R DNA double-strand break repair and chromosome translocations DNA Repair (Amst) 2006 ; 5 : 1075-81.
2. Misteli T Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function Cell 2007 ; 128 : 787-800.
3. Barzel A, Kupiec M Finding a match: how do homologous sequences get together for recombination? Nat Rev Genet 2008 ; 9 : 27-37.
4. Marshall WF, Straight A, Marko JF, et al Interphase chromosomes underg o constrained diffusional motion in living cells Curr Biol 1997 ; 7 : 930-9.
5. Heun P, Laroche T, Shimada K, et al Chromosome dynamics in the yeast inte rphase nucleus Science 2001 ; 294 : 2181-6.
6. Lisby M, Mortensen UH, Rothstein R Colocalization of multiple DNA double-stran d breaks at a single Rad52 repair centre Nat Cell Biol 2003 ; 5 : 572-7.
7. Aten JA, Stap J, Krawczyk PM, et al Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains Science 2004 ; 303 : 92-5.
8. Nagai S, Dubrana K, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, et al Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclea r pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase Science 2008 ; 322 : 597-602.
9. Kalocsay M, Hiller NJ, Jentsch S Chromosome-wide Rad51 spreading an d SUMO-H2A.Z-dependent chromosome fixation in response to a persistent DNA double-strand break Mol Cell 2009 ; 33 : 335-43.
10. Dimitrova N, Chen YC, Spector DL, de Lange T 53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility Nature 2008 ; 456 : 524-8.
11. Oza P, Jaspersen SL, Miele A, et al Mechanisms that regulate loca lization of a DNA double-strand break to the nuclear periphery Genes Dev 2009 ; 23 : 912-27.
12. Chiolo I, Minoda A, Colmenares SU, et al Doublestrand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP 1a domain to complete recombinational repair Cell 2011 ; 144 : 732-44.
13. Miné-Hattab J, Rothstein R Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination Nat Cell Biol 2012 ; 14 : 510-7.
14. Dion V, Kalck V, Horigome C, et al Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery Nat Cell Biol 2012 ; 14 : 502-9.
15. Krawczyk PM, Borovski T, Stap J, et al Chromatin mobility is increased at sites of DNA double-strand breaks J Cell Sci 2012 ; 125 : 2127-33.