Cervical alignment and range of motion after laminoplasty

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue 20, 2012, Pages

  MacHino, Masaaki ^a   Yukawa, Yasutsugu ^a   Hida, Tetsuro ^a   Ito, Keigo ^a   Nakashima, Hiroaki ^a   Kanbara, Shunsuke ^a   Morita, Daigo ^a   Kato, Fumihiko ^a  

^a CHUBU ROSAI HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

cervical spondylotic myelopathy; laminoplasty; range of motion; sagittal alignment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LAMINOPLASTY; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODIFIED DOUBLE DOOR LAMINOPLASTY; ORTHOSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REHABILITATION CARE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LAMINECTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPONDYLOSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866565602     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182659d3e     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bernhardt M, Hynes RA, Blume HW, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy . J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1993; 75 : 119 - 28.
2. Baisden J, Voo LM, Cusick JF, et al. Evaluation of cervical laminectomy and laminoplasty: A longitudinal study in the goat model . Spine 1999; 13 : 1283 - 8.
3. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Nakanisi K . Analysis of the cervical spine alignment following laminoplasty and laminectomy . Spinal Cord 1999; 37 : 20 - 4. (Pubitemid 29140129)
4. Wang MY, Shah S, Green BA . Clinical outcomes following cervical laminoplasty for 204 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy . Surg Neurol 2004; 62 : 487 - 92. (Pubitemid 39575475)
5. Suda Y, Saitou M, Shioda M, et al. Cervical laminoplasty for subaxial lesion in rheumatoid arthritis . J Spinal Disord Tech 2004; 17 : 94 - 101.
6. Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, et al. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy . Spine 2003; 28 : 1258 - 62. (Pubitemid 36734614)
7. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, et al. Minimum 10-year follow-up after en bloc cervical laminoplasty . Clin Orthop 2003; 411 : 129 - 39. (Pubitemid 36667270)
8. Puttlitz CM, Deviren V, Smith JA, et al. Biomechanics of cervical laminoplasty: Kinetic studies comparing different surgical techniques, temporal effects, and the degree of level involvement . Eur Spine J 2004; 13 : 213 - 21. (Pubitemid 38669954)
9. Ratliff JK, Cooper PR . Cervical laminoplasty: A critical review . J Neurosurg 2003; 98 : 230 - 8. (Pubitemid 36389895)
10. Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, et al. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy . Spine 1994; 19 : 507 - 10. (Pubitemid 24108334)
11. Kang SH, Rhim SC, Roh SW, et al. Postlaminoplasty cervical range of motion: Early results . J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6 : 386 - 90.
12. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, et al. Long-term results of double- door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy . Spine 2001; 26 : 479 - 87. (Pubitemid 32224279)
13. Kurokawa T, Nakamura K, Machida H . Cervical canal enlargement by split spinous process method [in Japanese] . Bessatsu Seikei Geka 1986; 9 : 30 - 2.
14. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, et al. Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy . Spine 2007; 32 : 1980 - 5.
15. Shuffl ebarger HL, King WF . Composite measurement of scoliosis: A new method of analysis of the deformity . Spine 1987; 12 : 228 - 32. (Pubitemid 17079384)
16. Ohara A, Miymoto K, Naganawa T, et al. Reliability of and correlations among fi ve standard methods of assessing the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine . Spine 2006; 31 : 2585 - 91. (Pubitemid 44632242)
17. Aita I, Wadano Y, Yabuki T . Curvature and range of motion of the cervical spine after laminaplasty . J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000; 82 : 1743 - 8.
18. Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, et al. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy - average 14-year follow-up study . Spine 2006; 31 : 2998 - 3005. (Pubitemid 46005889)
19. Suk KS, Kim KT, Lee JH, et al. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty . Spine 2007; 32 : E656 - 60.
20. Hyun SJ, Rhim SC, Roh SW, et al. The time course of range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: A prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up . Spine 2009; 34 : 1134 - 9.
21. Motosuneya T, Maruyama T, Yamada H, et al. Long-term results of tension-band laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy: A ten-year follow-up . J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011; 93 : 68 - 72.
22. Kimura A, Seichi A, Inoue H, et al. Long-term results of doubledoor laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacers in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy . Eur Spine J 2011; 20 : 1560 - 6.
23. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Ito K, et al. Dynamic changes in dural sac and spinal cord cross-sectional area in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Cervical spine . Spine 2011; 36 : 399 - 403.
24. Hirabayashi K, Satomi K . Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty . Spine 1988; 13 : 870 - 6.
25. Heller JG, Edwards CC II, Murakami H, et al. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: An independent matched cohort analysis . Spine 2001; 26 : 1330 - 6. (Pubitemid 32552508)
26. Kawai S, Sunago K, Doi K, et al. Cervical laminoplasty (Hattori's method): Procedure and follow-up results . Spine 1988; 13 : 1245 - 50. (Pubitemid 19007053)
27. Hale JJ, Gruson KI, Spivak JM . Laminoplasty: A review of its role in compressive cervical myelopathy . Spine J 2006; 6 : 289 - 98.
28. Steinmetz MP, Resnick DK . Cervical laminoplasty . Spine J 2006; 6 : 274 - 81.
29. Bolesta MJ, Rechtine GR II, Chrin AM . Three-and four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fi xation: A prospective study . Spine 2000; 25 : 2040 - 6. (Pubitemid 30662955)
30. Lowery GL, McDonough RF . The signifi cance of hardware failure in anterior cervical plate fi xation. Patients with 2 to 7 year followup . Spine 1998; 23 : 181 - 7. (Pubitemid 28128151)
31. Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, et al. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A long-term follow-up study over 10 years . Spine 2001; 26 : 1443 - 7. (Pubitemid 32606815)
32. Albert TJ, Vacarro A . Postlaminectomy kyphosis . Spine 1998; 23 : 2738 - 45. (Pubitemid 29013986)
33. Nowinski GP, Visarius H, Nolte LP, et al. A biomechanical comparison of cervical laminaplasty and cervical laminectomy with progressive facetectomy . Spine 1993; 18 : 1995 - 2004. (Pubitemid 23315903)
34. Aita I, Hayashi K, Wadano Y, et al. Posterior movement and enlargement of the spinal cord after cervical laminoplasty . J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998; 80 : 33 - 7.
35. Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, et al. Lordotic alignment and posterior migration of the spinal cord following en bloc open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: A magnetic resonance imaging study . J Neurol 1996; 243 : 626 - 32. (Pubitemid 26321006)
36. Hase H, Watanabe T, Hirasawa Y, et al. Bilateral open laminoplasty using ceramic laminas for cervical myelopathy . Spine 1991; 16 : 1269 - 76.
37. Fujimura Y, Nishi Y . Atrophy of the nuchal muscle and change in cervical curvature after expansive open-door laminoplasty . Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1996; 115 : 203 - 5. (Pubitemid 26112494)
38. Roselli R, Pompucci A, Formica F, et al. Open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy: Surgical technique and neurophysiological monitoring . J Neurosurg 2000; 92 : 38 - 43. (Pubitemid 30020448)
39. Takeuchi K, Yokoyama T, Ono A, et al. Limitation of activities of daily living accompanying reduced neck mobility after laminoplasty preserving or reattaching the semispinalis cervicis into axis . Eur Spine J 2008; 17 : 415 - 20.
40. Iizuka H, Nakagawa Y, Shimegi A, et al. Clinical results after cervical laminoplasty. Differences due to the duration of wearing a cervical collar . J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18 : 489 - 91. (Pubitemid 44384037)
41. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, et al. Minimum 2-year outcome of cervical laminoplasty with deep extensor muscle-preserving approach: Impact on cervical spine function and quality of life . Eur Spine J 2009; 18 : 663 - 71.
42. Takeuchi K, Yokoyama T, Ono A, et al. Cervical range of motion and alignment after laminoplasty preserving or reattaching the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis . J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20 : 571 - 6. (Pubitemid 350211589)
43. Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Inoue K, et al. Postoperative instability after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with spondylolisthesis . J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18 : 1 - 5. (Pubitemid 40239293)