Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: Range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 18, 2007, Pages 1980-1985

  Yukawa, Yasutsugu ^a   Kato, Fumihiko ^a   Ito, Keigo ^a   Horie, Yumiko ^a   Hida, Tetsurou ^a   Ito, Zenya ^a   Matsuyama, Yukihiro ^b  

^a CHUBU ROSAI HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Axial pain; Cervical compressive myelopathy; Laminoplasty; Prospective study; Range of motion; Skip laminectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL MYELOPATHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; LAMINECTOMY; LAMINOPLASTY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NECK PAIN; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SURGICAL PATIENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK PAIN; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34548137269     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318133fbce     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Albert TJ, Vacarro A. Postlaminectomy kyphosis. Spine 1998;23:2738-45.
2. Baisden J, Voo LM, Cusick JF, et al. Evaluation of cervical laminectomy and laminoplasty: a longitudinal study in the goat model. Spine 1999;13:1283-8; discussion 1288-9.
3. Guigui P, BenoistM,Deburge A. Spinal deformity and instability after multilevel cervical laminectomy for spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 1998;23:440-7.
4. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Nakanisi K. Analysis of the cervical spine alignment following laminoplasty and laminectomy. Spinal Cord 1999;37:20-4.
5. Mikawa Y, Shikata J, Yamamuro T. Spinal deformity and instability after multilevel cervical laminectomy. Spine 1987;12:6-11.
6. Kawai S, Sunago K, Doi K, et al. Cervical laminoplasty (Hattori's method): procedure and follow-up results. Spine 1988;13:1245-50.
7. Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N, Tanaka H, et al. Enlargement of spinal canal by sagittal splitting of the spinal processes [in Japanese]. Bessatsu Seikeigeka 1982;2:234-40.
8. Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, et al. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1994;19:507-10.
9. Heller JG, Edwards CC 2nd, Murakami H, et al. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine 2001;26:1330-6.
10. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, et al. Minimum 10-year follow-up after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop 2003;411:129-39.
11. Ogawa Y, Toyama Y, Chiba K, et al. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;1:168-74.
12. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, et al. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 2001;26:479-87.
13. Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty: a noticeable complication. Spine 1996;21:1969-73.
14. Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, et al. Results of skip laminectomy: minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty. Spine 2003;28:2667-72.
15. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishiara H, et al. Preventive measures for axial symptoms following cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:497-501.
16. Yoshida M, Tamaki T, Kawakami M, et al. Does reconstruction of posterior ligamentous complex with extensor musculature decrease axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty. Spine 2002;27:1414-8.
17. Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, et al. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2003;28:1258-62.