Postoperative instability after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with spondylolisthesis

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-5

  Sakai, Yoshihito ^a   Matsuyama, Yukihiro ^a   Inoue, Kikuo ^b   Ishiguro, Naoki ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b HAMAMATSU MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cervical instability; Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Laminoplasty; Spondylolisthesis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL MYELOPATHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LAMINOPLASTY; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYELOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; SPINE MOBILITY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE;

AGED; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 13744258722     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000145181.98873.22     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, et al. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine. 1983;8:693-699.
2. Kawai S, Sugano K, Doi K, et al. Cervical laminoplasty (Hattori's method). Procedure and follow-up results. Spine. 1988;13:1245-1250.
3. Tsuji H. Laminoplasty for patients with compressive myelopathy due to so-called spinal canal stenosis in cervical and thoracic regions. Spine. 1982;7:28-34.
4. Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis JD, et al. Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy. A prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review. Spine. 2000;25:670-676.
5. Ebersold MJ, Pare MC, Quast LM, et al. Surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:745-751.
6. Satomi K, Nishi Y, Kohno T, et al. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine. 1994;19:507-510.
7. Matsuda Y, Shibata T, Oki S, et al. Outcomes of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy in patients more than 75 years of age. Spine. 1999;24:529-534.
8. Okada Y, Ikata T, Yamada H, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging study on the results of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine. 1993;18:2024-2029.
9. Cusick JF, Pintar FA, Yoganandan N. Biomechanical alterations induced by multilevel cervical laminectomy. Spine. 1995;22:2392-2399.
10. Nowinski GP, Visarius H, Nolte LP, et al. A biomechanical comparison of cervical laminoplasty and cervical laminectomy with progressive facetectomy. Spine. 1993;14:1995-2004.
11. Yonenobu K, Fuji T, Ono K, et al. Choice of surgical treatment for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine. 1985;10:710-716.
12. Hase H, Watanabe T, Hirasawa Y, et al. Bilateral open laminoplasty using ceramic laminas for cervical myelopathy. Spine. 1991;16:1269-1276.
13. Aita I, Wadano Y, Yabuki T. Curvature and range of motion of the cervical spine after laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1743-1748.
14. Seichi A, Takeshita K, Ohishi I, et al. Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine, 2001;26:479-487.
15. Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N, Tanaka H, et al. Enlargement of spinal canal by sagittal splitting of the spinal process. Bessatu Seikeigeka. 1984;2:234-240. Japanese.
16. Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect. 1948;5:261-275.
17. Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1994;68:490-503.
18. Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring System for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine. 2001;26:1890-1895.
19. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, et al. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine. 1983;8:693-699.
20. Morio Y, Yamamoto K, Teshima R, et al. Clinicoradiologic study of cervical laminoplasty with posterolateral fusion or bone graft. Spine. 2000;25:190-196.
21. Penning L. Some aspects of plain radiography of the cervical spine in chronic myelopathy. Neurology. 1962;12:513-519.
22. Kokubun S, Sakurai M, Suzuki T, et al. Clinical importance of posterolisthesis in cervical spine lesion. Rinsho Seikei Geka. 1989;24:397-403. Japanese.
23. Epstein JA, Carras R, Epstein BS, et al. Myelopathy in cervical spondylosis with vertebral subluxation and hyperlordosis. J Neurosurg. 1970;32:421-426.
24. Lee C, Woodring JH, Rogers LF, et al. The radiographic distinction of degenerative slippage (spondylolisthesis and retrolisthesis) from traumatic slippage of the cervical spine. Skeletal Radiol. 1986;15:439-443.
25. Kamata M, Maruiwa H, Matsumoto T, et al. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with unstable cervical spine. Rinsho Seikei Geka. 1995;46:483-487. Japanese.
26. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Yoshida M, et al. Preoperative instability of the cervical spine in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by laminoplasty. Rinsho Seikei Geka. 2000;35:13-19. Japanese.
27. Aita I, Wadano Y, Yabuki T. Curvature and range of motion of the cervical spine after laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1743-1748.