Minimum 2-year outcome of cervical laminoplasty with deep extensor muscle-preserving approach: Impact on cervical spine function and quality of life

European Spine Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 663-671

  Kotani, Yoshihisa ^a   Abumi, Kuniyoshi ^b   Ito, Manabu ^a   Sudo, Hideki ^a   Takahata, Masahiko ^a   Ohshima, Shigeki ^a   Hojo, Yoshihiro ^a   Minami, Akio ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cervical myelopathy; Laminoplasty; Muscle preservation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL MYELOPATHY; CERVICAL SPINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLEXOR REFLEX; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAMINOPLASTY; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HISTORY, 18TH CENTURY; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; MUSCULAR ATROPHY; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67349093854     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0892-1     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. K Chiba Y Ogawa K Ishii 2006 Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy-average 14-year follow-up study Spine 31 2998 3005 10.1097/01.brs.0000250307.78987.6b
2. M Fukui K Chiba M Kawakami 2007 An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1 J Orthop Sci 12 227 240 10.1007/s00776-007-1118-1
3. K Hirabayashi Y Tomita K Chiba 1999 Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament Clin Orthop Relat Res 359 35 48 10.1097/00003086-199902000-00005
4. Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y (1997) Choice of surgical procedure for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments. In: Yonenobu K, Sakou T, Ono K (eds) ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Springer, Tokyo, pp 135-142
5. N Hosono H Sakaura Y Mukai 2007 The source of axial pain after cervical laminoplasty-C7 is more crucial than deep extensor muscles Spine 32 2985 2988
6. T Itoh H Tsuji 1985 Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine Spine 10 729 736 10.1097/00007632-198510000-00007
7. Japanese Orthopaedic Association 1994 Scoring system for cervical myelopathy Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 68 490 503 (in Japanese)
8. Y Kawaguchi M Kanamori H Ishihara 2003 Minimum 10-year followup after en bloc cervical laminoplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 411 129 139 10.1097/01.blo.0000069889.31220.62
9. S Kawai K Sunago K Doi 1988 Cervical laminoplasty (Hatori's method). Procedure and follow-up results Spine 13 1245 1250 10.1097/00007632-198811000- 00007
10. JK Ratliff PR Cooper 2003 Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review J Neurosurg Spine 98 Suppl 3 230 238
11. A Seichi K Takeshita I Ohnishi 2001 Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy Spine 26 479 487 10.1097/00007632-200103010-00010
12. T Shiraishi K Fukuda Y Yato 2003 Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty Spine 28 2667 2672 10.1097/01.BRS.0000103340.78418.B2
13. T Shiraishi Y Yato 2002 New double-door laminoplasty procedure for the axis to preserve all muscular attachments to the spinous process. Technical note Neurosurg Focus 12 E9 10.3171/foc.2002.12.1.10
14. T Shiraishi 2002 A new technique for exposure of the cervical spine laminae. Technical note J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 96 122 126
15. T Shiraishi 2002 Skip laminectomy-a new treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, preserving bilateral muscular attachments to the spinous processes: a preliminary report Spine J 2 108 115 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00118-8
16. KS Suk TK Kim JH Lee 2007 Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty Spine 32 E656 E660
17. K Takeuchi T Yokoyama S Aburakawa 2005 Axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty with C3 laminectomy compared with conventional C3-7 laminoplasty. A modified laminoplasty preserving the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis Spine 30 2544 2549 10.1097/01.brs.0000186332.66490.ba
18. K Takeuchi T Yokoyama A Ono 2007 Cervical range of motion and alignment after laminoplasty preserving or reattaching the semispinalis cervicis inserted into axis J Spinal Disord Tech 20 571 576
19. E Wada S Suzuki A Kanazawa 2001 Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A long-term follow-up study over 10 years Spine 26 1443 1448 10.1097/00007632-200107010-00011
20. M Yoshida T Tamaki M Kawakami 2002 Does reconstruction of posterior ligamentous complex with extensor musculature decrease axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty? Spine 27 1414 1418 10.1097/00007632-200207010-00008
21. Y Yukawa F Kato K Ito 2007 Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy. Range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study Spine 32 1980 1985 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318133fbce