When the world becomes 'too real': A Bayesian explanation of autistic perception

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 504-510

  Pellicano, Elizabeth ^a,c   Burr, David ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN DECISION THEORY; BAYESIAN MODEL; KEY FEATURE; PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE; PERCEPTUAL MECHANISM; PRIOR EXPERIENCE; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; SENSORY INFORMATION;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DISEASES;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

AUTISM; BAYES THEOREM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; LEARNING; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PERCEPTION; REVIEW; SENSORY STIMULATION; SENSORY SYSTEM; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; AUTISTIC DISORDER; BAYES THEOREM; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTION;

EID: 84866562603     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.08.009     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Rogers S.J., Ozonoff S. Annotation: what do we know about sensory dysfunction in autism? A critical review of the empirical evidence. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2005, 46:1255-1268.
2. Bogdashina O. Communication Issues in Autism and Asperger Syndrome 2004, Jessica Kingsley.
3. Williams D. Somebody Somewhere: Breaking Free from the World of Autism 1994, Jessica Kingsley.
4. Bertone A., et al. Enhanced and diminished visuo-spatial information processing in autism depends on stimulus complexity. Brain 2005, 128:2430-2441.
5. Happé F., Frith U. The weak coherence account: detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2006, 36:5-25.
6. Mitchell P., Ropar D. Visuo-spatial abilities in autism: a review. Inf. Child Dev. 2004, 13:185-198.
7. Mottron L., et al. Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: an update, and eight principles of autistic perception. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2006, 36:27-43.
8. Plaisted K. Reduced generalization in autism: an alternative to weak central coherence. The Development of Autism: Perspectives from Theory and Research 2001, 149-169. Erlbaum. J. Burack (Ed.).
9. Baron-Cohen S., et al. Talent in autism: hyper-systemizing, hyper-attention to detail and sensory hypersensitivity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 364:1377-1383.
10. Shah A., Frith U. An islet of ability in autistic children: a research note. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1983, 24:613-620.
11. Happé F.G. Studying weak central coherence at low levels: children with autism do not succumb to visual illusions. A research note. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1996, 37:873-877.
12. Miller L.K. The savant syndrome: intellectual impairment and exceptional skill. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 125:31-46.
13. Joseph R.M., et al. Why is visual search superior in autism spectrum disorder?. Dev. Sci. 2009, 12:1083-1096.
14. Plaisted K., et al. Enhanced visual search for a conjunctive target in autism: a research note. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1998, 39:777-783.
15. Plaisted K., et al. Enhanced discrimination of novel, highly similar stimuli by adults with autism during a perceptual learning task. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1998, 39:765-775.
16. Simmons D.R., et al. Vision in autism spectrum disorders. Vision Res. 2009, 49:2705-2739.
17. Franklin A., et al. Reduced chromatic discrimination in children with autism spectrum disorders. Dev. Sci. 2010, 13:188-200.
18. Bonnel A., et al. Enhanced pitch sensitivity in individuals with autism: a signal detection analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15:226-235.
19. Pellicano E., et al. Abnormal global processing along the dorsal visual pathway in autism: a possible mechanism for weak visuospatial coherence?. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:1044-1053.
20. Behrmann M., et al. Configural processing in autism and its relationship to face processing. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:110-129.
21. Dalton K.M., et al. Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:519-526.
22. Pellicano E., Macrae C.N. Mutual eye gaze facilitates person categorization for typically developing children, but not for children with autism. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2009, 16:1094-1099.
23. Senju A., et al. Reflexive orienting in response to eye gaze and an arrow in children with and without autism. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2004, 45:445-458.
24. Blake R., et al. Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychol. Sci. 2003, 14:151-157.
25. Koldewyn K., et al. The psychophysics of visual motion and global form processing in autism. Brain 2010, 133:599-610.
26. Kuhl P.K., et al. Links between social and linguistic processing of speech in preschool children with autism: behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Dev. Sci. 2005, 8:F1-F12.
27. Frith Uta Autism: Explaining the Enigma 1989, Blackwell.
28. Frith U., Happé F. Autism: beyond 'theory of mind'. Cognition 1994, 50:115-132.
29. Mottron L., et al. Enhanced perception in savant syndrome: patterns, structure and creativity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 364:1385-1391.
30. Baron-Cohen S., Belmonte M.K. Autism: a window onto the development of the social and the analytic brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 28:109-126.
31. Rubenstein J.L., Merzenich M.M. Model of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems. Genes Brain Behav. 2003, 2:255-267.
32. Kanner L. Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child 1943, 2:217-250.
33. Helmholtz H. Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics. Translated from the 3d German edn 1962, Dover Publications. J.P.C. Southall (Ed.).
34. Gregory R.L. Perceptions as hypotheses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 1980, 290:181-197.
35. Knill D.C., Pouget A. The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27:712-719.
36. Kersten D., et al. Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2004, 55:271-304.
37. Kersten D., Yuille A. Bayesian models of object perception. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2003, 13:150-158.
38. Mamassian P., et al. Bayesian modelling of visual perception. Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function 2002, MIT Press. R.P.N. Rao (Ed.).
39. Mamassian P., et al. The perception of cast shadows. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1998, 2:288-295.
40. Weiss Y., et al. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5:598-604.
41. Hollingworth H.L. The central tendency of judgements. J. Philos. Psychol. Sci. Methods 1910, 7:461-469.
42. Jazayeri M., Shadlen M.N. Temporal context calibrates interval timing. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13:1020-1026.
43. Cicchini G.M., et al. Optimal encoding of interval timing in expert percussionists. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:1056-1060.
44. Ma W.J., et al. Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:1432-1438.
45. Fiser J., et al. Statistically optimal perception and learning: from behavior to neural representations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:119-130.
46. Cherkassky V.L., et al. Functional connectivity in a baseline resting-state network in autism. Neuroreport 2006, 17:1687-1690.
47. Greenaway R., Plaisted K. Top-down attentional modulation in autistic spectrum disorders is stimulus-specific. Psychol. Sci. 2005, 16:987-994.
48. Iarocci G., et al. Global-local visual processing in high functioning children with autism: structural vs. implicit task biases. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2006, 36:117-129.
49. Loth E., et al. When seeing depends on knowing: adults with autism spectrum conditions show diminished top-down processes in the visual perception of degraded faces but not degraded objects. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1227-1236.
50. Soulières I., et al. Category induction in autism: slower, perhaps different, but certainly possible. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2010, 64:311-327.
51. Soulières I., et al. Atypical categorical perception in autism: autonomy of discrimination?. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2007, 37:481-490.
52. Mottron L., et al. Local bias in autistic subjects as evidenced by graphic tasks: perceptual hierarchization or working memory deficit?. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1999, 40:743-755.
53. Ropar D., Mitchell P. Shape constancy in autism: the role of prior knowledge and perspective cues. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2002, 43:647-653.
54. Becchio C., et al. Perception of shadows in children with autism spectrum disorders. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e10582.
55. Kohn A. Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 97:3155-3164.
56. Barlow H. Conditions for versatile learning, Helmholtz's unconscious inference, and the task of perception. Vision Res. 1990, 30:1561-1571.
57. Andrews D.P. Error-correcting perceptual mechanisms. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1964, 16:104-115.
58. Pellicano E., et al. Abnormal adaptive face-coding mechanisms in children with autism spectrum disorder. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1508-1512.
59. Tannan V., et al. Perceptual metrics of individuals with autism provide evidence for disinhibition. Autism Res. 2008, 1:223-230.
60. Fiorentini, C. et al. Reduced face identity after effects in relatives of children with autism. Neuropsychologia (in press).
61. Chopin A., Mamassian P. Predictive properties of visual adaptation. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:622-626.
62. Stocker A.A., Simoncelli E.P. Sensory adaptation within a Bayesian framework for perception. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2006, 1291-1298. MIT Press. Y. Weiss (Ed.).
63. Clifford C.W. Visual perception: knowing what to expect. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:R223-R225.
64. Gregory R. Brainy mind. BMJ 1998, 317:1693-1695.
65. Grandin T. Visual abilities and sensory differences in a person with autism. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 65:15-16.
66. Körding K.P., Wolpert D.M. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 2004, 427:244-247.
67. Baldi P., Itti L. Of bits and wows: a Bayesian theory of surprise with applications to attention. Neural Netw. 2010, 23:649-666.
68. Corlett P.R., et al. From drugs to deprivation: a Bayesian framework for understanding models of psychosis. Psychopharmacology 2009, 206:515-530.
69. Fletcher P.C., Frith C.D. Perceiving is believing: a Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:48-58.