District-wide effects on data use in the classroom;Efectos generales en los distritos escolares del uso de datos en el aula

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 20, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Wayman, Jeffrey C ^a   Cho, Vincent ^b   Jimerson, Jo Beth ^c   Spikes, Daniel D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^c TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data use; Data based decision making; Educational reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866556866     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10682341     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v20n25.2012     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
2. Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading data use in schools: Organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 292-327, DOI: 10.1080/15700761003731492.
3. Carlson, D., Borman, G. D., & Robinson, M. (2011). A multi-state district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 33(3), 378398.
4. Cho, V. & Wayman, J. C. (2012, April). Districts' efforts for data use and computer systems. Paper presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
5. Coburn, C.E., Honig, M.I., and Stein, M.K. (2009). What's the evidence on districts' use of evidence? In J. D. Bransford, D.J. Stipek, N.J. Vye, L.M. Gomez, and D. Lam (Eds.), The role of research in educational improvement (67-87). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
6. Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 375-395.
7. Datnow, A., Park, V., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007). Achieving with data: How high-performing school systems use data to improve instruction for elementary students. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Rossier School of Education, Center on Educational Governance.
8. Earl, L. & Fullan, M. (2003). Using data in leadership for learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 383-394.
9. Halverson, R., Prichett, R. B., & Watson, J. G. (2007, May). Formative feedback systems and The New Instructional Leadership. Retrieved June 30, 2011 from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2007_03.pdf
10. Hamilton, L., Halverson, R., Jackson, S. S., Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J. A., Wayman, J. C. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making. Washington D.C.: Institute of Education Sciences and the National Center for Education Evaluation.
11. Honig, M. I. & Coburn, C. (2008). Evidence-Based Decision Making in School District Central Offices. Educational Policy, 22(4), 578-608.
12. Ingram, D., Louis, K. S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106, 1258-1287.
13. Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 496-520.
14. Knapp, M. S., Swinnerton, J. A., Copland, M. A., & Monpas-Huber, J. (2006). Data-informed leadership in education. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
15. Lachat, M. A., & Smith, S. (2005). Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10(3), 333-349.
16. Long, L., Rivas, L. M., Light, D., & Mandinach, E. B. (2008). The evolution of a homegrown data warehouse: TUSDstats. In Mandinach, E. B., & Honey, M. (Eds.), Data-driven school improvement (pp. 209-232). New York, Teachers College Press.
17. Mandinach, E. B., Honey, M., Light, D., Brunner, C. (2008). A conceptual framework for datadriven decision making. In Mandinach, E. B., and Honey, M. (Eds.), Data-driven school improvement. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Marsh, J. A., McCombs, J. S., Martorell, F. (2010). How instructional coaches support data-driven decision making: Policy implementation and effects in Florida middle schools. Educational Policy, 24(872).
19. May, H. & Robinson, M. A. (2007). A randomized evaluation of Ohio's Personalized Assessment Reporting System (PARS). Madison, WI: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
20. Means, B., Padilla, C., DeBarger, A., and Bakia, M. (2010). Implementing data-informed decision-making in schools-Teacher access, supports and use. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. Retrieved February 27, 2012 from www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html.
21. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. Stringfield, S., & Datnow, A. (2002). Systemic supports for schools serving students placed at risk. In Stringfield, S., & Land, D. (Eds.) (2002). Educating at-risk students. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
23. Supovitz, J. A. (2010). Knowledge-based organizational learning for instructional improvement. In Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (Eds.). Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 707-723). New York: Springer.
24. Supovitz, J. A., & Klein, V. (2003). Mapping a course for improved student learning: How innovative schools systematically use student performance data to guide improvement. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
25. Tuomi, I. (1999). Data is more than knowledge: Implications of the reversed hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(3), 103.
26. Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519-558.
27. Vasquez Heilig, J. & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Accountability Texas-style: The progress and learning of urban minority students in a high-stakes testing context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 30(2), 75-110
28. Wayman, J. C. (2010, May). The Data-Informed District: A preliminary framework. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver CO.
29. Wayman, J. C., Spring, S. D., & Lemke, M. A., Lehr, M. D. (2012, April). Using data to inform practice: effective principal leadership strategies. Paper presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
30. Wayman, J. C., Cho, V., & Johnston, M. T. (2007). The Data-Informed District: A district-wide evaluation of data use in the Natrona County School District. Retrieved February 1, 2010 from http://edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/datause
31. Wayman, J. C., Cho, V., & Shaw, S. M. (2009a). First-year results from an efficacy study of the Acuity data system. Austin: Authors.
32. Wayman, J. C., Cho, V., & Shaw, S. (2009b). Survey of Educator Data Use. Unpublished document.
33. Wayman, J. C., Shaw, S. M., & Cho, V (2011). Second-year results from an efficacy study of the Acuity data system. Austin: Authors.
34. Wayman, J. C., & Stringfield, S. (2006). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 549-571.
35. Young, V. M. (2006). Teachers' use of data: Loose coupling, agenda setting, and team norms. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 521-548.