Assessing the applicability of fuzzy neural networks for habitat preference evaluation of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes)

Ecological Informatics

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 286-295

  Fukuda, Shinji ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Data driven models; Fuzzy sets; Habitat evaluation; Species distribution models; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BACK PROPAGATION; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DATA SET; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT SELECTION; HABITAT USE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP; TELEOST; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

JAPAN;

ORYZIAS; ORYZIAS LATIPES;

EID: 80051791872     PISSN: 15749541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adriaenssens V., Goethals P.L.M., De Pauw N. Fuzzy knowledge-based models for prediction of Asellus and Gammarus in watercourses in Flanders (Belgium). Ecol. Model. 2006, 195:3-10.
2. Ahmadi-Nedushan B., St-Hilaire A., Bérubé B., Robichaud E., Thiémonge N., Bobée B. A review of statistical methods for the evaluation of aquatic habitat suitability for instream flow assessment. River Res. Appl. 2006, 22:503-523.
3. Ayllón D., Almodóvar A., Nicola G.G., Elvira B. Interactive effects of cover and hydraulics on Brown trout habitat selection patterns. River Res. Appl. 2009, 25:1051-1065.
4. Ayllón, D., Almodóvar, A., Nicola, G.G., Elvira, B., in press. The influence of variable habitat suitability criteria on PHABSIM habitat index results. River Res. Appl.
5. Bishop C.M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning 2006, Springer.
6. Buckley J.J., Hayashi Y. Fuzzy neural networks: A survey. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1994, 66:1-13.
7. Chon T.S. Self-Organizing Maps applied to ecological sciences. Ecol. Inform. 2011, 6:50-61.
8. Chon T.S., Park Y.S., Moon K.H., Cha E.Y. Patternizing communities by using an artificial neural network. Ecol. Model. 1996, 90:69-78.
9. Copp G.H. An empirical model for predicting microhabitat of 0+ juvenile fishes in a lowland river catchment. Oecologia 1992, 91:338-345.
10. Copp G.H. Comparative microhabitat use of cyprinid larvae and juveniles in a lotic floodplain channel. Environ. Biol. Fishes 1992, 33:188-193.
11. Copp G.H. Importance of marinas and off-channel water bodies as refuges for young fishes in a regulated lowland river. Regul. Rivers 1997, 13:303-307.
12. Copp G.H. Microhabitat use of fish larvae and 0+ juveniles in a highly regulated section of the river Great Ouse. Regul. Rivers 1997, 13:267-276.
13. Elith J., Graham C.H. Do they? How do they? Why do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 2009, 32:66-77.
14. Elith J., Leathwick J.R. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40:677-697.
15. Elith J., Ferrier S., Huettmann F., Leathwick J. The evaluation strip: A new and robust method for plotting predicted responses from species distribution models. Ecol. Model. 2005, 186:280-289.
16. Elith J., Graham C.H., Anderson R.P., Dudík M., Ferrier S., Guisan A., Hijmans R.J., Huettmann F., Leathwick J.R., Lehmann A., Li J., Lohmann L.G., Loiselle B.A., Manion G., Moritz C., Nakamura M., Nakazawa Y., Overton J.M., Peterson A.T., Phillips S.J., Richardson K., Scachetti-Pereira R., Schapire R.E., Soberón J., Williams S., Wisz M.S., Zimmermann N.E. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 2006, 29:129-151.
17. Fukuda S. Consideration of fuzziness: Is it necessary in modelling fish habitat preference of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes)?. Ecol. Model. 2009, 220:2877-2884.
18. Fukuda S. Assessing transferability of genetic algorithm-optimized fuzzy habitat preference models for Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Proceedings of the GEFS 2010 Fourth International Workshop on Genetic and Evolutionary Fuzzy Systems 2010, 57-62.
19. Fukuda S., Hiramatsu K. Prediction ability and sensitivity of artificial intelligence-based habitat preference models for predicting spatial distribution of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Ecol. Model. 2008, 215:301-313.
20. Fukuda S., Okushima S. Assessing nonlinearity in fish habitat preference of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) using genetic algorithm-optimized habitat prediction models. JARQ-Jpn. Agric. Res. Quart. 2008, 42(2):97-107.
21. Fukuda S., Hiramatsu K., Mori M. Fuzzy neural network model for habitat prediction and HEP for habitat quality estimation focusing on Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) in agricultural canals. Paddy Water Environ. 2006, 4(3):119-124.
22. Fukuda S., De Baets B., Mouton A.M., Waegeman W., Nakajima J., Mukai T., Hiramatsu K., Onikura N. Effect of model formulation on the optimization of a genetic Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy system for fish habitat suitability evaluation. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222:1401-1413.
23. Goldberg D. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning 1989, Addison-Wesley.
24. Gozlan R.E., Mastrorillo S., Copp G.H., Lek S. Predicting the structure and diversity of young-of-the-year fish assemblages in large rivers. Freshw. Biol. 1999, 41:809-820.
25. Guay J.C., Boisclair D., Leclerc M., Lapointe M. Assessment of the transferability of biological habitat models for Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2003, 60:1398-1408.
26. Guisan A., Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:993-1009.
27. Guisan A., Zimmermann N.E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 2000, 135:147-186.
28. Hiramatsu K., Fukuda S., Shikasho S. Mathematical modeling of habitat preference of Japanese medaka for instream water environment using fuzzy inference. Trans. JSIDRE. 2003, 228:65-72. (in Japanese with English abstract).
29. Ishibuchi H., Nii M. Fuzzification of input vectors for improving the generalization ability of neural networks. The Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems 1998, 1153-1158.
30. Lek S., Delacoste M., Baran P., Dimopoulos I., Lauga J., Aulagnier S. Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology. Ecol. Model. 1996, 90:39-52.
31. Mäki-Petäy A., Huusko A., Erkinaro J., Muotka T. Transferability of habitat suitability criteria of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2002, 59:218-228.
32. Martinez-Capel F., Garcia De Jalon D., Werenitzky D., Baeza D., Rodilla-Alama M. Microhabitat use by three endemic Iberian cyprinids in Mediterranean rivers (Tagus River Basin, Spain). Fish. Manage. Ecol. 2009, 16:52-60.
33. Mouton A.M., Schneider M., Peter A., Holzer G., Müller R., Goethals P.L.M., De Pauw N. Optimisation of a fuzzy physical habitat model for spawning European grayling (Thymallus thymallus L.) in the Aare River (Thun, Switzerland). Ecol. Model. 2008, 215:122-132.
34. Mouton A.M., De Baets B., Goethals P.L.M. Knowledge-based versus data-driven fuzzy habitat suitability models for river management. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2009, 24:982-993.
35. Mouton A.M., De Baets B., Van Broekhoven E., Goethals P.L.M. Prevalence-adjusted optimisation of fuzzy models for species distribution. Ecol. Model. 2009, 220:1776-1786.
36. Mouton A.M., Dedecker A.P., Lek S., Goethals P.L.M. Selecting variables for habitat suitability of Asellus (Crustacea, Isopoda) by applying input variable contribution methods to artificial neural network models. Environ. Model. Assess. 2010, 15:65-79.
37. Nykänen M., Huusko A. Transferability of habitat preference criteria for larval European grayling (Thymallus thymallus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2004, 61:185-192.
38. Olden J.D., Jackson D.A. Illuminating the "black box": A randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecol. Model. 2002, 154:135-150.
39. Olden J.D., Joy M.K., Death R.G. An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulation data. Ecol. Model. 2004, 178:389-397.
40. Pino-Mejías R., Cubiles-de-la-Vega M.D., Anaya-Romero M., Pascual-Acosta A., Jordán-López A., Bellinfante-Crocci N. Predicting the potential habitat of oaks with data mining models and the R system. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:826-836.
41. Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E., Williams R.J. Learning representations by back-propagation errors. Nature 1986, 323:533-536.
42. Takagi T., Sugeno M. Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modelling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1985, 15:116-132.
43. Tirelli, T., Pessani, D., in press. Importance of feature selection in decision-tree and artificial-neural-network ecological applications. Alburnus alburnus alborella: A practical example, Ecol. Inform.
44. Van Broekhoven E., Adriaenssens V., De Baets B., Verdonschot P.F.M. Fuzzy rule-based macroinvertebrate habitat suitability models for running waters. Ecol. Model. 2006, 198:71-84.
45. Van Broekhoven E., Adriaenssens V., De Baets B. Interpretability-preserving genetic optimization of linguistic terms in fuzzy models for fuzzy ordered classification: An ecological case study. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 2007, 44:65-90.
46. Watkins M.S., Doherty S., Copp G.H. Microhabitat use by 0+ and older fishes in a small English chalk stream. J. Fish Biol. 1997, 50:1010-1024.