Urban district identity as a common ingroup identity: The different role of ingroup prototypicality for minority and majority groups

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 706-716

  Ufkes, Elze G ^a,b   Otten, Sabine ^a   Van Der Zee, Karen I ^a   Giebels, Ellen ^b   Dovidio, John F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866532116     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.1888     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Bergsieker, H. B., Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248-264. DOI: 10.1037/a0018474
4. Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
5. Devos, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). American=White? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88, 447-466. DOI: 0.1037/0022-3514.88.3.447
6. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2007). Another view of "we": Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 296-330. DOI: 10.1080/10463280701726132
7. Eurostat. (2010). The Europop2010 convergence scenario [Data file]. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database
8. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878
9. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: The Psychology Press.
10. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2009). A common ingroup identity: A categorization-based approach for reducing intergroup bias. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice (pp. 489-506). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
11. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorisation and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 1-26). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1985). Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 51-66.
13. Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., ... Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
14. Luijters, K., Van der Zee, K. I., & Otten, S. (2008). Cultural diversity in organizations: Enhancing identification by valuing differences. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 154-163. Elsevier.
15. Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (2001). Aversive discrimination. In R. Brown, & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 112-132). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16. Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174. DOI: 0.1207/s15327957pspr0302_4
17. Outten, H. R., Schmitt, M. T., Miller, D. A., & Garcia, A. L. (2012). Feeling threatened about the future: Whites' emotional reactions to anticipated ethnic demographic changes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 14-25. DOI: 10.1177/0146167211418531
18. Peker, M., Crisp, R. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2010). Predictors of ingroup projection: The roles of superordinate category coherence and complexity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 525-542. DOI: 10.1177/1368430209360205
19. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY US: Touchstone Books/Simon & Schuster.
20. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137-174. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
21. Rosa, M., Alexandre, J., & Waldzus, S. (2011, July). The future belongs to us: Conditions for minorities to claim superiority. In K. Deaux (Ed.), (Chair), Minority membership: Processes and outcomes of facing inferiority and claiming superiority. Stockholm, Sweden: Symposium conducted at the meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology.
22. Schubert, T. W., & Otten, S. (2002). Overlap of self, ingroup, and outgroup: Pictorial measures of self-categorization. Self and Identity, 1, 353-376. DOI: 529-8868/2002
23. Scientific council for government policy. (2005). Vertrouwen in de buurt [Trust in the neighborhood]. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
24. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Sindic, D., & Reicher, S. D. (2007). The instrumental use of group prototypicality judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.007
26. Statistics Netherlands. (2010). Kerncijferswijken en buurten [Core figures districts and neighborhoods] [Data File]. Retrieved from http://statline.cbs.nl/
27. Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79-97.
28. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29. Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In J. C. Turner, M. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory (pp. 42-67). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
30. U. S. Census Bureau. (2008) National population projection [Data file and code book]. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/downloadablefiles.html
31. Ullrich, J. (2009). Reconsidering the "relative" in relative ingroup prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 299-310. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.540
32. Van Oudenhoven, J. P., Prins, K. S., & Buunk, B. P. (1998). Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 995-1013.
33. Waldzus, S., & Mummendey, A. (2003). Inclusion in a superordinate category, in-group prototypicality, and attitudes toward out-groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 31-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.09.003
34. Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (2005). When" different" means" worse": In-group prototypicality in changing intergroup contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 76-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.006
35. Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M., & Boettcher, F. (2004). Of bikers, teachers and Germans: Groups diverging views about their prototypicality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 385-400.
36. Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M., & Weber, U. (2003). Toward tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 31-47.
37. Weber, U., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2002). Perceived legitimacy of intergroup status differences: Its prediction by relative ingroup prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 449-470.
38. Wenzel, S., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331-372. DOI: 10.1080/10463280701728302
39. Wenzel, S., Mummendey, A., Weber, U., & Waldzus, S. (2003). The ingroup as pars pro toto: Projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 461-473. DOI: 10.1177/0146167202250913