Chromosome orientation fluorescence in situ hybridization to study sister chromatid segregation in vivo

Nature Protocols

Volumn 5, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1362-1377

  Falconer, Ester ^a   Chavez, Elizabeth ^a   Henderson, Alexander ^a   Lansdorp, Peter M ^a,b  

^a BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROXURIDINE; EXONUCLEASE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ASSAY; CELL DIVISION; CHROMOSOME ORIENTATION FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; DNA STRAND; ENZYME DEGRADATION; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MOLECULAR PROBE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHOTOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEGREGATION ANALYSIS; SISTER CHROMATID; SISTER CHROMATID SEGREGATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; C57BL MOUSE; CHROMATID; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COLON; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MITOSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIDS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COLON; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MITOSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 77954275263     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2010.102     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lansdorp, P.M. Immortal strands? Give me a break. Cell 129, 1244-1247 (2007).
2. Rando, T.A. The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction. Cell 129, 1239-1243 (2007).
3. Falconer, E. et al. Identifcation of sister chromatids by DNA template strand sequences. Nature 463, 93-97 (2010).
4. Meyne, J. & Goodwin, E.H. Strand-specifc fuorescence in situ hybridization for determining orientation and direction of DNA sequences. Methods Mol. Biol. 33, 141-145 (1994).
5. Potten, C.S., Hume, W.J., Reid, P. & Cairns, J. The segregation of DNA in epithelial stem cells. Cell 15, 899-906 (1978).
6. Karpowicz, P. et al. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. J. Cell. Biol. 170, 721-732 (2005).
7. Shinin, V., Gayraud-Morel, B., Gomes, D. & Tajbakhsh, S. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nat. Cell. Biol. 8, 677-687 (2006).
8. Smith, G.H. Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development 132, 681-687 (2005).
9. Cairns, J. Somatic stem cells and the kinetics of mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10567-10570 (2002).
10. Goodwin, E. & Meyne, J. Strand-specifc FISH reveals orientation of chromosome 18 alphoid DNA. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 63, 126-127 (1993).
11. Bailey, S.M., Goodwin, E.H. & Cornforth, M.N. Strand-specifc fuorescence in situ hybridization: the CO-FISH family. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 107, 14-17 (2004).
12. Goodwin, E.H., Meyne, J., Bailey, S.M. & Quigley, D. On the origin of lateral asymmetry. Chromosoma 104, 345-347 (1996).
13. Garagna, S. et al. Pericentromeric organization at the fusion point of mouse Robertsonian translocation chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 171-175 (2001).
14. Lin, M.S. & Davidson, R.L. Centric fusion, satellite DNA, and DNA polarity in mouse chromosomes. Science 185, 1179-1181 (1974).
15. Alves, P. & Jonasson, J. New staining method for the detection of sister-chromatid exchanges in BrdU-labelled chromosomes. J. Cell. Sci. 32, 185-195 (1978).
16. Limoli, C.L. & Ward, J.F. A new method for introducing double-strand breaks into cellular DNA. Radiat. Res. 134, 160-169 (1993).
17. Lansdorp, P.M. et al. Heterogeneity in telomere length of human chromosomes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 685-691 (1996).
18. Poon, S.S. & Lansdorp, P.M. Quantitative fuorescence in situ hybridization (Q-FISH). Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 14 Chapter 18, 18.4.1-18.4.21 (2001).
19. Horz, W. & Altenburger, W. Nucleotide sequence of mouse satellite DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 683-696 (1981).
20. Vissel, B. & Choo, K.H. Mouse major (gamma) satellite DNA is highly conserved and organized into extremely long tandem arrays: implications for recombination between nonhomologous chromosomes. Genomics 5, 407-414 (1989).
21. Wu, R., Singh, P.B. & Gilbert, D.M. Uncoupling global and fne-tuning replication timing determinants for mouse pericentric heterochromatin. J. Cell. Biol. 174, 185-194 (2006).
22. Allen, J.W. & Latt, S.A. Analysis of sister chromatid exchange formation in vivo in mouse spermatogonia as a new test system for environmental mutagens. Nature 260, 449-451 (1976).
23. Poon, S.S., Martens, U.M., Ward, R.K. & Lansdorp, P.M. Telomere length measurements using digital fuorescence microscopy. Cytometry 36, 267-278 (1999).
24. Gertsenstein, M., Lobe, C. & Nagy, A. ES cell-mediated conditional transgenesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 185, 285-307 (2002)