A neurophysiological evaluation of a cognitive cycle in humans

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 452-461

  Gómez, Carlos M ^a   Flores, Angelica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bayesian brain; CNV; Evaluation; P3a; P3b; Preparation; Trial by trial learning

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACILITATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROBIOLOGY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SENSORY STIMULATION;

BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; CUES; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

EID: 78649905097     PISSN: 01497634     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.05.005     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Anllo-Vento L. Shifting attention in visual space: effects of peripheral cueing on brain cortical potentials. Int. J. Neurosci. 1995, 80:353-370.
2. Bender S., Weisbrod M., Bornfleth H., Resch F., Oelkers-Ax R. How do children prepare to react? Imaging maturation of motor preparation and stimulus anticipation by late contingent negative variation. Neuroimage 2005, 27:737-752.
3. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Carter C.S., Barch D.M., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 2001, 108:624-642.
4. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D., Carter C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:539-546.
5. Brodeur D.A., Boden C. The effects of spatial uncertainty and cue predictability on visual orienting in children. Cogn. Dev. 2000, 15:367-382.
6. Brunia C.H.M. Neural aspects of anticipatory behaviour. Acta Psychol. 1999, 101:213-242.
7. Brunia C.H.M., Van Boxtel G.J. Wait and see. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2001, 43:59-75.
8. Burle B., Allain S., Vidal F., Hasbroucq T. Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control: does conflict really matter?. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2005, 31:831-837.
9. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:201-215.
10. Coull J.T. Neural correlates of attention and arousal: insights from electrophysiology, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology. Prog. Neurobiol. 1998, 55:343-361.
11. Courchesne E. Neurophysiological correlates of cognitive development: changes in long-latency event-related potentials from childhood to adulthood. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1978, 45:468-482.
12. Cui R.Q., Egkher A., Huter D., Lang W., Lindinger G., Deecke L. Highresolution spatio-temporal analysis of the contingent negative variation in simple or complex motor tasks and a non-motor task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111:1847-1859.
13. Deecke, L., Bashore, T., Brunia, C.H.M., Grunewald-Zuberbier, E., Grunewald, G., Kristeva, R., 1984. Movement-associated potentials and motor control. In: Karrer, R., Cohen, J., Tueting, P. (Eds.), Brain and Information: Event-Related Potentials. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. N.Y. Ac. Sci., New York, pp. 398-428.
14. Dien J., Spencer K.M., Donchin E. Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by principal component analysis. Cogn. Brain Res. 2003, 17:637-650.
15. Digiacomo M.R., Marco-Pallarés J., Flores A.B., Gómez C.M. Wavelet analysis of the EEG during the neurocognitive evaluation of invalidly cued targets. Brain Res. 2008, 1234:94-103.
16. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. Behav. Brain Sci. 1988, 11:355-372.
17. Duncan-Johnson C.C., Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: the variation in event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 1977, 14:456-457.
18. Eimer M. Spatial cueing, sensory gating and selective response preparation: an ERP study on visuo-spatial orienting. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1993, 88:408-420.
19. Escera C., Alho K., Winkler I., Näätänen R. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1998, 10:590-604.
20. Fan J., Kolster R., Ghajar J., Suh M., Knight R.T., Sarkar R., McCandliss B.D. Response anticipation and response: an event-related potentials and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:2272-2282.
21. Flores A.B., Digiacomo M.R., Meneres S., Trigo E., Gómez C.M. Development of preparatory activity indexed by the Contingent negative variation in children. Brain Cogn. 2009, 71:129-140.
22. Flores A.B., Gómez C.M., Meneres S. Evaluation of spatial validity-invalidity effects by the P300 component in children and young adults. Brain Res. Bull. 2010, 81(6):525-533.
23. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Gaeta H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2001, 25:355-373.
24. Friston K. The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:293-301.
25. Friston K. The free energy principle: a unified brain theory?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11(2):127-138.
26. Frith C. A framework for studying the neural basis for attention. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:1367-1371.
27. Fuster J.M. Cortex and Mind: Unifying Cognition 2003, Oxford University Press, New York.
28. Fuster J.M. Upper processing stages of the perception-action cycle. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:143-145.
29. Gehring W.J., Gross B., Coles M.G.H., Meyer D.E., Donchin E. A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol. Sci. 1993, 4:385-390.
30. Giedd J.N., Blumenthal J., Jeffries N.O., Castellanos F.X., Liu H., Zijdenbos A., Paus T., Evans A.C., Rapoport J.L. Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:861-863.
31. Giedd J.N. Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2004, 1021:77-85.
32. Gómez C.M., Delinte A., Vaquero E., Cardoso M.J., Vazquez M., Crommelynck M., Roucoux A. Current source density analysis of CNV during temporal gap paradigm. Brain Topogr. 2001, 13:149-159.
33. Gómez C.M., Marco J., Grau C. Preparatory visuo-motor cortical network of the contingent negative variation estimated by current density. Neuroimage 2003, 20:216-224.
34. Gómez C.M., Fernández A., Maestú F., Amo C., González-Rosa J.J., Vaquero E., Ortiz T. Task-specific sensory and motor preparatory activation revealed by magnetic CNV. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2004, 21:59-68.
35. Gómez C.M., Flores A., Ledesma A. Fronto-parietal networks activation during the contingent negative period. Brain Res. Bull. 2007, 73:40-47.
36. Gómez C.M., Flores A., Digiacomo M.R., Ledesma A., González-Rosa J. P3a and P3b components associated to the neurocognitive evaluation of invalidly cued targets. Neurosci. Lett. 2008, 430:181-185.
37. Gómez C.M., Flores A., Digiacomo M.R. Increased brain activation during the processing of spatially invalidly cued targets. Open Neuroimag. J. 2008, 2:106-113.
38. Gómez C.M., Flores A., Digiacomo M.R., Vázquez-Marrufo M. Sequential P3 effects in a Posner's spatial cueing paradigm. Trial-by-trial learning of the predictive. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 2009, 69:155-167.
39. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1992, 121:480-506.
40. Gumenyuk V., Korzyukov O., Alho K., Escera C., Näätänen R. Effects of auditory distraction on electrophysiological brain activity and performance in children aged 8-13 years. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:30-36.
41. Harter M.R., Steven L.M., Price N.J., Lalonde M.E., Keyes A.L. Neural processes involved in directing attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1989, 1:223-237.
42. Holroyd C.B., Coles M.G. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error related negativity. Psychol. Rev. 2002, 109:679-709.
43. Hopfinger J.B., Buonocore M.H., Mangun G.R. The neural mechanisms of top down attentional control. Nat. Neurosci. 2000, 3:284-291.
44. Jongen E.M., Smulders F.T. Sequence effects in a spatial cueing task: endogenous orienting is sensitive to orienting in the preceding trial. Psychol. Res. 2007, 71:516-523.
45. Jonkman L.M., Lansbergen M., Stauder J.E. Developmental differences in behavioral and event-related brain responses associated with response preparation and inhibition in a go/nogo task. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:752-761.
46. Kastner S., Pinsk M.A., De Weerd P., Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 1999, 22:751-761.
47. Kerns J.G., Cohen J.D., MacDonald A.W., Cho R.Y., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 2004, 303:1023-1026.
48. Lee K.M., Chang K.H., Roh J.K. Subregions within the supplementary motor area activated at different stages of movement preparation and execution. Neuroimage 1999, 9:117-123.
49. Loveless N.E., Sanford A.J. Slow potentials correlates of preparatory set. Biol. Psychol. 1974, 1:303-314.
50. Luck S.J., Chelazzi L., Hillyard S.A., Desimone R. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1997, 77:124-142.
51. Luck S.J., Heinze H.J., Mangun G.R., Hillyard S.A. Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1990, 75:528-542.
52. Mangun G.R., Hillyard S.A. Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1991, 17:1057-1074.
53. Mangun G.R., Hillyard S.A., Luck S.J. Attention and Performance XIV 1993, 219-243. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Meyer, S. Kornblum (Eds.).
54. Mnatsakanian E.V., Tarkka I.M. Task-specific expectation is revealed in scalp-recorded slow potentials. Brain Topogr. 2002, 15:87-94.
55. Notebaert W., Gevers W., Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B. Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2006, 13:112-117.
56. Perchet C., García-Larrea L. Visuo-spatial attention and motor reaction in children: an electrophysiological study of the "Posner" paradigm. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:231-241.
57. Perchet C., Revol O., Fourneret P., Mauguière F., Garcia-Larrea L. Attention shifts and anticipatory mechanisms in hyperactive children: an ERP study using the Posner paradigm. Biol. Psychiatry 2001, 50:44-57.
58. Perchet C., García-Larrea L. Learning to react: anticipatory mechanisms in children and adults during a visuospatial attention task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2005, 116:1906-1917.
59. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:2128-2148.
60. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1980, 32:3-25.
61. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance 1984, 531-556. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Bouma, D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.).
62. Requin J., Lecas J.C., Vitton N. A comparison of preparation-related neuronal activity changes in the prefrontal, premotor, primary motor and posterior parietal areas of the monkey cortex: preliminary results. Neurosci. Lett. 1990, 111:151-156.
63. Rockstroh B., Elbert T., Birbaumer N., Lutzenberger W. Slow Brain Potentials and Behavior 1982, Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore-Munich.
64. Rösler F., Heil M., Henninghausen E. Distinct cortical activation patterns during long-term retrieval of verbal, spatial and color information. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1995, 7:51-65.
65. Segalowitz S.J., Davies P.L. Charting the maturation of the frontal lobe: an electrophysiological strategy. Brain Cogn. 2004, 55:16-33.
66. Shaw P., Kabani N.J., Lerch J.P., Eckstrand K., Lenroot R., Gogtay N., Greenstein D., Clasen L., Evans A., Rapoport J.L., Giedd J.N., Wise S.P. Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:3586-3594.
67. Stige S., Fjell A.M., Smith L., Lindgren M., Walhovd K. The development of visual P3a and P3b. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2007, 32:563-584.
68. Stürmer B., Leuthold H., Soetens E., Schroter H., Sommer W. Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2002, 28:1345-1363.
69. Talsma D., Slagter H.A., Nieuwenhuis S., Hage J., Kok A. The orienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related brain potential study. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 25:117-129.
70. Thomas K.M., Nelson C.A. Age-related changes in the electrophysiological response to visual stimulus novelty: a topographical approach. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996, 98:294-308.
71. Verleger R., Jaśkowski P., Wascher E. Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. J. Psychophysiol. 2005, 19:165-181.
72. Vossel S., Thiel C.M., Fink G.R. Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex. Neuroimage 2006, 32:1257-1264.
73. Walter W.G., Cooper R., Aldridge W.J., McCallum W.C. Contingent negative variation: an electrophysiological sign of sensoriomotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 1964, 203:380-384.
74. Wetzel N., Widmann A., Berti S., Schröger E. The development of involuntary and voluntary attention from childhood to adulthood: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117:2191-2203.
75. Yamazaki T., Kamijo K., Kenmochi A., Fukuzumi S., Kiyuna T., Takaki Y., Kuroiwa Y. Multiple equivalent current dipole source localization of visual event-related potentials during oddball paradigm with motor response. Brain Topogr. 2000, 12:159-175.
76. Yu A.J., Dayan P. Uncertainty, neuromodulation and attention. Neuron 2005, 46:681-692.