Geometric aspects of composite pulses

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 370, Issue 1976, 2012, Pages 4671-4689

  Ichikawa, Tsubasa ^a   Bando, Masamitsu ^a   Kondo, Yasushi ^a   Nakahara, Mikio ^a  

^a KINKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Composite pulses; Geometric phases; Geometric quantum gates; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Quantum control

Indexed keywords

LOGIC GATES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; QUANTUM COMPUTERS; QUANTUM ELECTRONICS; QUANTUM OPTICS;

COUPLING ERRORS; GEOMETRIC PHASIS; GEOMETRIC QUANTUM GATES; HOLONOMY; IN-CONTROL; PULSE LENGTH; PULSE TECHNIQUE; QUANTUM COMPUTING; QUANTUM CONTROL; QUANTUM SYSTEM; ROBUST OPERATION; TWO-QUBIT; UNITARY GATES; UNITARY OPERATION; VANISHING DYNAMICAL PHASE;

GEOMETRY;

EID: 84866414170     PISSN: 1364503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0358     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Freeman, R. 1999 Spin choreography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Claridge, T. D. W. 1999 High-resolution NMR techniques in organic chemistry. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
3. Jones, J. A. 2009 Composite pulses in NMR quantum computation. J. Ind. Inst. Sci. 89, 303-308.
4. Levitt, M. H. & Freeman, R. 1979 NMR population inversion using a composite pulse. J. Magn. Reson. 33, 473-476. (doi:10.1016/0022-2364(79)90265-8)
5. Levitt, M. H. 1986 Composite pulses. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 18, 61-122. (doi:10.1016/0079-6565(86)80005-X)
6. Levitt, M. H. 1996 Composite pulses. In Encyclopedia of nuclear magnetic resonance (eds D. M. Grant & R. K. Harris), pp. 1396-1411. Sussex, UK: Wiley.
7. Tycko, R., Pines, A. & Guckenheimer, J. 1985 Fixed point theory of iterative excitation schemes in NMR. J. Chem. Phys. 83, 2775-2802. (doi:10.1063/1.449228)
8. Khaneja, N., Reiss, T., Kehlet, C., Schulte-Herbrüggen, T. & Glaser, S. J. 2005 Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms. J. Magn. Reson. 172, 296-305. (doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2004.11.004)
9. Machnes, S., Sander, U., Glaser, S. J., de Fouquières, P., Gruslys, A., Schirmer, S. & Schulte-Herbrüggen, T. 2011 Comparing, optimizing, and benchmarking quantum-control algorithms in a unifying programming framework. Phys. Rev. A 84, 022305. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.022305)
10. Ichikawa, T., Bando, M., Kondo, Y. & Nakahara, M. 2011 Designing robust unitary gates: application to concatenated composite pulse. Phys. Rev. A 84, 062311. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.062311)
11. Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A. & Weinfurter, H. 1995 Elementary gates for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457-3467. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.52. 3457)
12. Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. C. 2000 Quantum information and quantum computation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Bengtsson, I. & ̇Zyczkowski, K. 2006 Geometry of quantum states. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14. Gaitan, F. 2008 Quantum error correction and fault tolerant quantum computing. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
15. Nakahara, M. & Ohmi, T. 2008 Quantum computing: from linear algebra to physical realizations. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
16. Jones, J. A. 2011 Quantum computing with NMR. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 59, 91-120. (doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2010.11.001)
17. Jones, J. A. 2003 Robust Ising gates for practical quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 67, 012317. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.67.012317)
18. Hill, C. D. 2007 Robust controlled-NOT gates from almost any interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 180501. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.180501)
19. Testolin, M. J., Hill, C. D., Wellard, C. J. & Hollenberg, L. C. L. 2007 Robust controlled-NOT gate in the presence of large fabrication-induced variations of the exchange interaction strength. Phys. Rev. A 76, 012302. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.76.012302)
20. Tomita, Y., Merrill, J. T. & Brown, K. R. 2010 Multi-qubit compensation sequences. New J. Phys. 12, 015002. (doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/1/ 015002)
21. Cummins, H. K., Llewellyn, G. & Jones, J. A. 2003 Tackling systematic errors in quantum logic gates with composite rotations. Phys. Rev. A 67, 042308. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.67.042308)
22. Brown, K. R., Harrow, A. W. & Chuang, I. L. 2004 Arbitrarily accurate composite pulse sequences. Phys. Rev. A 70, 052318. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.70. 052318)
23. Alway, W. G. & Jones, J. A. 2007 Arbitrary precision composite pulses for NMR quantum computing. J. Magn. Reson. 189, 114-120. (doi:10.1016/j.jmr. 2007.09.001)
24. Zanardi, P. & Rasetti, M. 1999 Holonomic quantum computation. Phys. Lett. A 264, 94-99. (doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00803-8)
25. Zhu, S.-L. & Wang, Z.-D. 2002 Implementation of universal quantum gates based on nonadiabatic geometric phases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097902. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.097902)
26. Shapere, A. & Wilczek, F. 1989 Geometric phases in physics. Singapore: World Scientific.
27. Berry, M. V. 1984 Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45-57. (doi:10.1098/rspa.1984.0023)
28. Wilczek, F. & Zee, A. 1984 Appearance of gauge structure in simple dynamical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2111-2114. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.52. 2111)
29. Aharonov, Y. & Anandan, J. 1987 Phase change during a cyclic quantum evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1593-1596. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1593)
30. Mead C. A. 1992 The geometric phase in molecular systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 51-85. (doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.64.51)
31. Simon, B. 1983 Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and Berry's phase. Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2167-2170. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.2167)
32. Nakahara, M. 2003 Geometry, topology and physics, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
33. Page, D. N. 1987 Geometrical description of Berry's phase. Phys. Rev. A 36, 3479-3481. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.36.3479)
34. Zhu, S.-L. & Zanardi, P. 2005 Geometric quantum gates that are robust against stochastic control errors. Phys. Rev. A 72, 020301. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.72.020301)
35. Blais, A. & Tremblay, A.-M. S. 2003 Effect of noise on geometric logic gates for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 67, 012308. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.67.012308)
36. Kondo, Y. & Bando, M. 2011 Geometric quantum gates, composite pulses, and Trotter-Suzuki formulas. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 80, 054002. (doi:10.1143/JPSJ. 80.054002)
37. Ota, Y. & Kondo, Y. 2009 Composite pulses in NMR as nonadiabatic geometric quantum gates. Phys. Rev. A 80, 024302. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80. 024302)
38. Ota, Y., Goto, Y., Kondo, Y. & Nakahara, M. 2009 Geometric quantum gates in liquid-state NMR based on a cancellation of dynamical phases. Phys. Rev. A 80, 052311. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.052311)
39. Wimperis, S. 1994 Broadband, narrowband, and passband composite pulses for use in advanced NMR experiments. J. Magn. Reson. A 109, 221-231. (doi:10.1006/jmra.1994.1159)
40. Ryan, C. A., Hodges, J. S. & Cory, D. G. 2010 Robust decoupling techniques to extend quantum coherence in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 200402. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.200402)
41. Souza, A. M., Álvarez G. A. & Suter, D. 2011 Robust dynamical decoupling for quantum computing and quantum memory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 240501. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.240501)