Effect of noise on geometric logic gates for quantum computation

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  Blais, A ^a   Tremblay, A M S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; ERROR ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; VECTORS;

GEOMETRIC GATES; NONADIABATIC GEOMETRIC PHASE; QUANTUM COMPUTATION; QUBIT;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0037241029     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. D. Vion, A. Aassime, A. Cottet, P. Joyez, H. Pothier, C. Urbina, D. Esteve, and M.H. Devoret, Science 296, 886 (2002).
2. A.M. Steane, in Introduction to Quantum Computation and Information, edited by H.K. Lo, S. Popescu, and T.P. Spiller (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999), p. 184.
3. P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3306 (1997).
4. D.A. Lidar, I.L. Chuang, and K.B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998).
5. L. Viola and S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. A 58, 2733 (1998).
6. M.V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 392, 45 (1984).
7. J. Jones, V. Vedral, A. Ekert, and G. Castagnoli, Nature (London) 403, 869 (2000).
8. A. Ekert, M. Ericsson, P. Hayden, H. Inamori, J.A. Jones, D.K.L. Oi, and V. Vedral, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 2501 (2000).
9. G. Falci, R. Fazio, G. Massimo Palma, J. Siewert, and V. Vedral, Nature (London) 407, 355 (2000).
10. F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2111 (1984).
11. P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, Phys. Lett. A 264, 94 (1999).
12. L.-M. Duan, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Science 292, 1965 (2001).
13. M.-S. Choi, e-print quant-ph/0111019.
14. L. Faoro, J. Siewert, and R. Fazio, e-print cond-mat/0202217.
15. Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1593 (1987).
16. W. Xiang-Bin and M. Keiji, e-print quant-ph/0104127
17. W. Xiang-Bin and M. Keiji, Phys. Rev. B 65, 172508 (2002).
18. Y. Makhlin, G. Schön, and A. Shnirman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 357 (2001).
19. J. Anandan and L. Stodolsky, Phys. Rev. D 35, 2597 (1987).
20. D. Bacon, J. Kempe, D.P. DiVincenzo, D.A. Lidar, and K.B. Whaley, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Experimental Emplementations of Quantum Computation, Sydney, Australia, edited by R. Clark (Rinton, Princeton, NJ, 2001), p. 257.
21. D.J. Moore, Phys. Rep. 210, 1 (1991).
22. Y. Nakamura, Y.P. Pashkin, and J.S. Tsai, Nature (London) 398, 786 (1999).
23. C. Bouchiat and G.W. Gibbons, J. Phys. (France) 49, 187 (1988).
24. J. Anandan, Phys. Lett. A 133, 171 (1988).
25. D. Suter, K.T. Mueller, and A. Pines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1218 (1988).
26. This is equivalent, for example, to a neutron interferometry experiment, where the first qubit in Eq. (10) represents position and the second spin of the neutron. Since a qubit has only, by construction, a two-dimensional Hilbert space, it is necessary to use more than one qubit to mimic interferometry experiments where more than one degree of freedom of a single particle are used.
27. M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
28. M.D. Bowdrey, D.K.L. Oi, A.J. Short, K. Banaszek, and J.A. Jones, Phys. Lett. A 294, 258 (2002)
29. M.A. Nielsen, e-print quant-ph/0205035.
30. A. Nazir, T.P. Spiller, and W.J. Munro, Phys. Rev. A 65, 042303 (2002).