Antibacterial properties of nanoparticles

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 499-511

  Hajipour, Mohammad J ^a   Fromm, Katharina M ^b   Akbar Ashkarran, Ali ^c   Jimenez de Aberasturi, Dorleta ^d,e   Larramendi, Idoia Ruiz de ^e   Rojo, Teofilo ^e   Serpooshan, Vahid ^f   Parak, Wolfgang J ^d   Mahmoudi, Morteza ^a  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MAZANDARAN   (Iran)

^d PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^f STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Antibacterial agent; Nanoparticle; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

ANTI-MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ANTIBACTERIAL AGENT; ANTIBACTERIAL PROPERTIES; FOOD PACKAGING; HUMAN BODIES; METAL OXIDE NANOPARTICLES; WATER DISINFECTIONS;

DISINFECTION; FUMIGATION; METALLIC COMPOUNDS; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; TISSUE; TOXICITY;

NANOPARTICLES;

COPPER OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; MULTI WALLED NANOTUBE; NANOPARTICLE; NICKEL OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; NITRIC OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; SILVER NANOPARTICLE; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE NANOPARTICLE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VANCOMYCIN; ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLE;

ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BACTERIAL CELL WALL; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL MEMBRANE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BIOFILM; DEFENSE MECHANISM; DESULFOTOMACULUM; DNA DENATURATION; ECOSYSTEM; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FRAMESHIFT MUTATION; KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; MYCOBACTERIUM SMEGMATIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA; REVIEW; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; SHEWANELLA ONEIDENSIS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; STATIC ELECTRICITY; VANCOMYCIN RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCUS;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA; BIOTECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; INORGANIC CHEMICALS; METALS; NANOPARTICLES;

EID: 84866401949     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.06.004     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. von Nussbaum F., et al. Antibacterial natural products in medicinal chemistry - exodus or revival?. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45:5072-5129.
2. Witte W. International dissemination of antibiotic resistant strains of bacterial pathogens. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2004, 4:187-191.
3. Oldenburg A.L., et al. Magnetic contrast agents for optical coherence tomography. Proc. of SPIE 2004, 5316:91-98.
4. Rakow N.A., Suslick K.S. A colorimetric sensor array for odour visualization. Nature 2000, 406:710-713.
5. Baker-Austin C., et al. Co-selection of antibiotic and metal resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14:176-182.
6. Huh A.J., Kwon Y.J. "Nanoantibiotics": a new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotics resistant era. J. Control. Release 2011, 156:128-145.
7. Whitesides G.M. Nanoscience, nanotechnology, and chemistry. Small 2005, 1:172-179.
8. Xia Y. Nanomaterials at work in biomedical research. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7:758-760.
9. Singleton P. Bacteria. Biology, Biotechnology and Medicine 2004, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, England, 570 pp., ISBN 0-470-09027-8. 6th ed.
10. Scott J.R., Barnett T.C. Surface proteins of gram-positive bacteria and how they get there. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 60:397-423.
11. Roberts I.S. The biochemistry and genetics of capsular polysaccharide production in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1996, 50:285-315.
12. Ashkarran A.A., et al. Bacterial effects and protein corona evaluations: crucial ignored factors for prediction of bio-efficacy of various forms of silver nanoparticles. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012, 25:1231-1242.
13. Baek Y.W., An Y.J. Microbial toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles (CuO, NiO, ZnO, and Sb2O3) to Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptococcus aureus. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409:1603-1608.
14. Lu C., et al. Slow growth induces heat-shock resistance in normal and respiratory-deficient yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20:891-903.
15. Brown M.R., et al. Resistance of bacterial biofilms to antibiotics: a growth-rate related effect?. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1988, 22:777-780.
16. Mah T.F., O'Toole G.A. Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends Microbiol. 2001, 9:34-39.
17. Stewart P.S. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofi{ligature}lms. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2002, 292:107-113.
18. Mahmoudi M., Serpooshan V. Silver-coated engineered magnetic nanoparticles are promising for the success in the fight against antibacterial resistance threat. ACS Nano 2012, 6:2656-2664.
19. Park H., et al. Inactivation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 biofilms by hyperthermia using superparamagnetic nanoparticles. J. Microbiol. Methods 2011, 84:41-45.
20. Landini P., et al. Molecular mechanisms of compounds affecting bacterial biofilm formation and dispersal. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86:813-823.
21. Sutherland I. Biofilm exopolysaccharides: a strong and sticky framework. Microbiology 2001, 147:3-9.
22. Bolla J.M., et al. Strategies for bypassing the membrane barrier in multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585:1682-1690.
23. Fabrega J., et al. Silver nanoparticle impact on bacterial growth: effect of pH, concentration, and organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:7285-7290.
24. Lara H.H., et al. Silver nanoparticles are broad-spectrum bactericidal and virucidal compounds. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2011, 9:30.
25. Musee N., et al. The antibacterial effects of engineered nanomaterials: implications for wastewater treatment plants. J. Environ. Monit. 2011, 13:1164-1183.
26. Lellouche J., et al. Antibiofilm surface functionalization of catheters by magnesium fluoride nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7:1175-1188.
27. Applerot G., et al. ZnO nanoparticle-coated surfaces inhibit bacterial biofilm formation and increase antibiotic susceptibility. RSC Adv. 2012, 2:2314-2321.
28. Thill A., et al. Cytotoxicity of CeO2 nanoparticles for Escherichia coli. Physico-chemical insight of the cytotoxicity mechanism. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:6151-6156.
29. Soenen S.J., et al. Cellular toxicity of inorganic nanoparticles: common aspects and guidelines for improved nanotoxicity evaluation. Nano Today 2011, 6:446-465.
30. Nel A.E., et al. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8:543-557.
31. Allahverdiyev A.M., et al. Antimicrobial effects of TiO(2) and Ag(2)O nanoparticles against drug-resistant bacteria and leishmania parasites. Future microbiol. 2011, 6:933-940.
32. Guzman M., et al. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Nanomedicine 2012, 8:37-45.
33. Pan X., et al. Mutagenicity evaluation of metal oxide nanoparticles by the bacterial reverse mutation assay. Chemosphere 2010, 79:113-116.
34. Maness P.-C., et al. Bactericidal activity of photocatalytic TiO2 reaction: toward an understanding of its killing mechanism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65:4094-4098.
35. 2 phototoxicity for bacteria. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186:306-312.
36. Pramanik A., et al. A novel study of antibacterial activity of copper iodide nanoparticle mediated by DNA and membrane damage. Colloids Surf. B 2012, 96:50-55.
37. Wang S., et al. Toxic effects of gold nanoparticles on Salmonella typhimurium bacteria. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2011, 27:547-554.
38. Santo C.E., et al. Contribution of copper ion resistance for survival of Escherichia coli on metallic copper surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 74:977-986.
39. Baek Y.-W., An Y.-J. Microbial toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles (CuO, NiO, ZnO, and Sb2O3) to Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptococcus aureus. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409:1603-1608.
40. Heinlaan M., et al. Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. Chemosphere 2008, 71:1308-1316.
41. Devi L.S., Joshi S.R. Antimicrobial and synergistic effects of silver nanoparticles synthesized using: Soil fungi of high altitudes of Eastern Himalaya. Mycobiology 2012, 40:27-34.
42. Juan L., et al. Deposition of silver nanoparticles on titanium surface for antibacterial effect. Int. J. Nanomed. 2010, 5:261-267.
43. Leid J.G., et al. In vitro antimicrobial studies of silver carbene complexes: activity of free and nanoparticle carbene formulations against clinical isolates of pathogenic bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67:138-148.
44. Sondi I., Salopek-Sondi B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 275:177-182.
45. Suri S.S., et al. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 2007, 2:16.
46. Chen W.J., et al. Functional Fe3O4/TiO2 core/shell magnetic nanoparticles as photokilling agents for pathogenic bacteria. Small 2008, 4:485-491.
47. Friedman A., et al. Susceptibility of Gram-positive and -negative bacteria to novel nitric oxide-releasing nanoparticle technology. Virulence 2011, 2:217-221.
48. Huang Z., et al. Toxicological effect of ZnO nanoparticles based on bacteria. Langmuir 2008, 24:4140-4144.
49. Wang Z.L., Song J. Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. Science 2006, 312:242-246.
50. Qiu Z., et al. Nanoalumina promotes the horizontal transfer of multiresistance genes mediated by plasmids across genera. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:4944-4949.
51. Wu B., et al. Bacterial responses to Cu-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408:1755-1758.
52. Fang J., et al. Effect of a fullerene water suspension on bacterial phospholipids and membrane phase behavior. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:2636-2642.
53. Simon-Deckers A., et al. Size-, composition- and shape-dependent toxicological impact of metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes toward bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:8423-8429.
54. Tavares A.F., et al. A novel nitroreductase of Staphylococcus aureus with S-nitrosoglutathione reductase activity. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191:3403-3406.
55. Jarboe L.R., et al. Determination of the Escherichia coli S-nitrosoglutathione response network using integrated biochemical and systems analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:5148-5157.
56. Bang I.S., et al. Maintenance of nitric oxide and redox homeostasis by the salmonella flavohemoglobin hmp. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:28039-28047.
57. Frey A.D., et al. Bacterial hemoglobins and flavohemoglobins for alleviation of nitrosative stress in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68:4835-4840.
58. Gajjar P., et al. Antimicrobial activities of commercial nanoparticles against an environmental soil microbe, Pseudomonas putida KT2440. J. Biol. Eng. 2009, 3:9.
59. Kumar N., et al. Perturbation of an arctic soil microbial community by metal nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 190:816-822.
60. Molina M.A., et al. A two-partner secretion system is involved in seed and root colonization and iron uptake by Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 8:639-647.
61. Van Wees S.C., et al. Plant immune responses triggered by beneficial microbes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11:443-448.
62. Choi O., Hu Z. Size dependent and reactive oxygen species related nanosilver toxicity to nitrifying bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:4583-4588.
63. You J., et al. Bacteria and bacteriophage inactivation by silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2011, 85:161-167.
64. Cabeen M.T., Jacobs-Wagner C. Bacterial cell shape. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3:601-610.
65. Hall-Stoodley L., et al. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2:95-108.
66. Subbiahdoss G., et al. Magnetic targeting of surface-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles yields antibacterial efficacy against biofilms of gentamicin-resistant staphylococci. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8:2047-2055.
67. Khan A.U. Medicine at nanoscale: a new horizon. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2012, 7:2997-2998.
68. Hetrick E.M., et al. Anti-biofilm efficacy of nitric oxide-releasing silica nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2782-2789.
69. Sinha R., et al. Interaction and nanotoxic effect of ZnO and Ag nanoparticles on mesophilic and halophilic bacterial cells. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:1516-1520.
70. Ruparelia J.P., et al. Strain specificity in antimicrobial activity of silver and copper nanoparticles. Acta Biomater. 2008, 4:707-716.
71. Jiang W., et al. Bacterial toxicity comparison between nano- and micro-scaled oxide particles. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157:1619-1625.
72. Khan S.S., et al. Studies on interaction of colloidal silver nanoparticles (SNPs) with five different bacterial species. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2011, 87:129-138.
73. Tsuang Y.H., et al. Studies of photokilling of bacteria using titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Artif. Organs 2008, 32:167-174.
74. Morones J.R., et al. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2005, 16:2346-2353.
75. Feris K., et al. Electrostatic interactions affect nanoparticle-mediated toxicity to gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Langmuir 2010, 26:4429-4436.
76. Fayaz A.M., et al. Biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their synergistic effect with antibiotics: a study against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Nanomedicine 2010, 6:103-109.
77. Wang Z., et al. Anti-microbial activities of aerosolized transition metal oxide nanoparticles. Chemosphere 2010, 80:525-529.
78. Rispoli F., et al. Understanding the toxicity of aggregated zero valent copper nanoparticles against Escherichia coli. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 180:212-216.
79. Kumar A., et al. Cellular uptake and mutagenic potential of metal oxide nanoparticles in bacterial cells. Chemosphere 2011, 83:1124-1132.
80. Sheng Z., Liu Y. Effects of silver nanoparticles on wastewater biofilms. Water Res. 2011, 45:6039-6050.