The care span low cognitive ability and poor skill with numbers may prevent many from enrolling in medicare supplemental coverage

Health Affairs

Volumn 31, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1847-1854

  Chan, Sewin ^a   Elbel, Brian ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INCOME; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEDICARE; MENTAL HEALTH; READING; SOCIAL CLASS; AGED; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGED; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MEDICARE PART B; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84866336711     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1000     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Strictly speaking, Medicare Advantage plans replace rather than supplement traditional Medicare-that is, they also cover the same ground as Parts A and B. However, we follow convention and use " supplemental coverage" to refer to both Medicare Advantage and Medigap. Our use of " Medicare Advantage plan" also includes previous incarnations of such plans.
2. Goldman D, Maestas N. Medicare expenditure risk and household portfolio choice. J Appl Econom. 2012 May 12. [Epub ahead of print].
3. McWilliams JM, Afendulis CC, McGuire TG, Landon BE. Complex Medicare Advantage choices may overwhelm seniors-especially those with impaired decision making. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(9): 1786-94.
4. Hanming Fang and et al. tangentially imply a positive relationship between enrollment in Medigap and cognitive ability, but they do not directly test for the relationship. Fang H, Keane MP, Silverman D. Sources of advantageous selection: evidence from the Medigap insurance market. J Polit Econ. 2008; 116(2):303-50.
5. Plomin R. Intelligence, genetics of cognitive abilities. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB, editors. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Oxford (UK): Elsevier; 2001. p. 7645-51.
6. Albert SM, Teresi JA. Reading ability, education, and cognitive status assessment among older adults in Harlem, New York City. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(1):95-7.
7. Levinthal BR, Morrow DG, Tu W,Wu J, Murray MD. Cognition and health literacy in patients with hypertension. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(8): 1172-6.
8. Dartigues JF, Gagnon M, Letenneur L, Barberger-Gateau P, Commenges D, Evaldre M. Principal lifetime occupation and cognitive impairment in a French elderly cohort (Paquid). Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135(9):981-8.
9. Elwood PC, Gallacher JE, Hopkinson CA, Pickering J, Rabbitt P, Stollery B. Smoking, drinking, and other life style factors and cognitive function in men in the Caerphilly cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999; 53(1):9-14.
10. Perlmutter M, Nyquist L. Relationships between self-reported physical and mental health and intelligence performance across adulthood. J Gerontol. 1990;45(4):P145-55.
11. BlaumCS, Ofstedal MB, Liang J. Low cognitive performance, comorbid disease, and task-specific disability: findings from a nationally representative survey. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57(8):M523-31.
12. Weiler PG, Lubben JE, Chi I. Cognitive impairment and hospital use. Am J Public Health. 1991;81(9): 1153-7.
13. Kelman HR, Thomas C. Transitions between community and nursing home residence in an urban elderly population. J Community Health. 1990;15(2):105-22.
14. Shapiro E, Tate RB. The impact of mental status score and a dementia diagnosis on mortality and institutionalization. J Aging Health. 1991; 3(1):28-46.
15. Peters E, Hibbard J, Slovic P, Dieckmann N. Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(3):741-8.
16. Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making. 2001;21(1): 37-44.
17. Wood S, Hanoch Y, Barnes A, Liu PJ, Cummings J, Bhattacharya C, et al. Numeracy And Medicare Part D: the importance of choice and literacy for numbers in optimizing decision making for Medicare's prescription drug program. Psychol Aging. 2011; 26(2):295-307.
18. Greene J, Peters E, Mertz CK, Hibbard JH. Comprehension and choice of a consumer-directed health plan: an experimental study. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(6):369-76.
19. Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. J Econ Perspect. 2005;19(4):25-42.
20. Banks J, O'Dea C, Oldfield Z. Cognitive function, numeracy, and retirement saving trajectories. Econ J. 2010;120(548):F381-410.
21. Information on the sample design, interview methods, and other details can be found in National Institute on Aging. Growing older in America: the Health and Retirement Study [Internet]. Washington (DC): National Institutes of Health; 2007 Mar [cited 2012 Jul 12]. Available from: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/index.php?p=dbook
22. We would expect this distribution of enrollment in supplemental coverage to be different from that of the entire Medicare population because our data included only noninstitutionalized individuals age sixty-five or older
23. Herzog AR, Wallace RB. Measures of cognitive functioning in the AHEAD study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997;52(Spec No):37-48.
24. Weir DR, Wallace RB, Langa KM, Plassman BL, Wilson RS, Bennett DA, et al. Reducing case ascertainment costs in U.S. population studies of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and cognitive impairment-part 1. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(1): 94-109.
25. Plassman BL, Langa KM, Fisher GG, Heeringa SG,Weir DR, Ofstedal MB, et al. Prevalence of dementia in the United States: the aging, demographics, and memory study. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29(1-2): 125-32.
26. Wilson RS, Weir DR, Leurgans SE, Evans DA, Hebert LE, Langa KM. Sources of variability in estimates of the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease in the United States. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(1):74-9.
27. Mehta KM, Fung KZ, Kistler CE, Chang A, Walter LC. Impact of cognitive impairment on screening mammography use in older US women. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(10):1917-23.
28. These distributions are very similar to those for all Health and Retirement Study respondents age sixtyfive or older
29. To access the Appendix, click on the Appendix link in the box to the right of the article online
30. Elbel B, Schlesinger M. Is more better? An experimental analysis of consumer choice. 2009. Unpublished paper.
31. Elbel B, Schlesinger M. How much choice? Nonlinear relationships between the number of health plan options and the behavior of Medicare beneficiaries. 2009. Unpublished paper.
32. Kling JR, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Vermeulen L, Wrobel MV. Comparison friction: experimental evidence from Medicare drug plans. Q J Econ. 2012;127(1):188-235.
33. Hsee C. Attribute availability: its implications for joint-separate evaluation reversals and beyond. Chapter 31 in: Kahneman D, Tversky A, editors. Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 543-63.
34. Pashler H, Johnston JC, Ruthruff E. Attention and performance. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:629-51.
35. Dafny L, Dranove D. Do report cards tell consumers anything they don't already know? The case of Medicare HMOs. Rand J Econ. 2008;39(3): 790-821.
36. Hibbard JH, Berkman N, McCormack LA, Jael E. The impact of a CAHPS report on employee knowledge, beliefs, and decisions. Med Care Res Rev. 2002;59(1): 104-16.
37. Scanlon DP, Chernew M, McLaughlin C, Solon G. The impact of health plan report cards on managed care enrollment. J Health Econ. 2002;21(1):19-41.
38. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Libertarian paternalism. Am Econ Rev. 2003; 93(2):175-9.
39. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 2008.