The care span: Complex medicare advantage choices may overwhelm seniors- especially those with impaired decision making

Health Affairs

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1786-1794

  McWilliams, J Michael ^a,b   Afendulis, Christopher C ^a   Mcguire, Thomas G ^a   Landon, Bruce E ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICARE; POPULATION; RESPONSE TIME; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONFUSION; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION DISORDERS; CONFUSION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MEDICARE PART C; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84855657324     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0132     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Medicare payment policy [Internet]. Washington (DC): MedPAC; 2010 [cited 2011 Jan 13]. Available from: http://www.medpac.gov/ documents/Mar10_EntireReport.pdf
2. Gold M. The growth of private plans in Medicare, 2006. Washington (DC): Kaiser Family Foundation; 2006. (Report No. 7473).
3. Botti S, Iyengar SS. The dark side of choice: when choice impairs social welfare. J Public Policy Mark. 2006;25(1):24-38.
4. Kunreuther H, Meyer R, Zeckhauser R, Slovic P, Schwartz B, Schade C, et al. High stakes decision making: normative, descriptive, and prescriptive considerations. Marketing Letters. 2002;13(3):259-68.
5. Anderson CJ. The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychol Bull. 2003; 129(1):139-67.
6. Dhar R. Consumer preference for a no-choice option. J Consum Res. 1997;24:215-31.
7. Gilovich T, Medvec VH. The experience of regret: what, when, and why. Psychol Rev. 1995;102(2):379-95.
8. Iyengar SS, Lepper MR. When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79(6):995-1006.
9. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Ins. 1988;1:7-59.
10. Finucane ML, Slovic P, Hibbard JH, Peters E, Mertz CK, MacGregor DG. Aging and decision-making competence: an analysis of comprehension and consistency skills in older versus younger adults considering health plan options. J Behav Dec Making. 2002;15:141-64.
11. Hibbard JH, Slovic P, Peters E, Finucane ML, Tusler M. Is the informed-choice policy approach appropriate for Medicare beneficiaries? Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20(3):199-203.
12. Alzheimer's Association. Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2009; 5(3):234-70.
13. Plassman BL, Langa KM, Fisher GG, Heeringa SG, Weir DR, Ofstedal MB, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(6):427-34.
14. Plassman BL, Langa KM, Fisher GG, Heeringa SG, Weir DR, Ofstedal MB, et al. Prevalence of dementia in the United States: the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29(1-2): 125-32.
15. Abaluck JT, Gruber J. Choice inconsistencies among the elderly: evidence from plan choice in the Medicare Part D program. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research; 2009. (Working Paper No. 14759).
16. Hanoch Y, Rice T, Cummings J, Wood S. How much choice is too much? The case of the Medicare prescription drug benefit. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(4):1157-68.
17. Winter J, Balza R, Caro F, Heiss F, Jun BH, Matzkin R, et al. Medicare prescription drug coverage: consumer information and preferences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103(20):7929-34.
18. Kling JR, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Vermeulen L, Wrobel MV. Misperception in choosing Medicare drug plans [Internet]. New York (NY): City University of New York; 2009 [cited 2011 Jan 13]. Available from: http://web.gc.cuny.edu/economics/ SeminarPapers/Fall%202010/ Kling.pdf
19. Tanius BE, Wood S, Hanoch Y, Rice T. Aging and choice: applications to Medicare Part D. Judgm Decis Mak. 2009;4(1):92-101.
20. Health and Retirement Study. 1992-2008 public use data sets, 1992-2006 restricted geographic identifiers, and 1991-2007 restricted HRS Medicare and Summary Data. Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with funding from the National Institute on Aging (Grant No. NIA U01AG009740) [Internet]. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan; [cited 2011 Jul 28]. Available from: http://hrsonline .isr.umich.edu/index.php?p=data
21. Health and Retirement Study. Sample sizes and response rates (2002 and beyond) [Internet]. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan; [cited 2011 Jan 13]. Available from: http:// hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/sampleresponse.pdf
22. Ofstedal MB, Fisher GG, Herzog AR. Documentation of cognitive functioning measures in the Health and Retirement Study [Internet]. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan; 2005 [cited 2011 Jan 13]. (HRS Documentation Report No. DR-006). Available from: http:// hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/ userg/dr-006.pdf
23. Fisher GG, Hassan H, Rodgers WL, Weir DR. Health and Retirement Study imputation of cognitive functioning measures: 1992-2006 [Internet]. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan; 2009 [cited 2011 Jan 13]. Available from: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/modules/ meta/xyear/cogimp/desc/ COGIMPdd.pdf
24. Brandt J, Spencer M, Folstein M. The telephone interview for cognitive status. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1988;1:111-7.
25. Breitner JC, Welsh KA, Gau BA, McDonald WM, Steffens DC, Saunders AM, et al. Alzheimer's disease in the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council registry of aging twin veterans. III. Detection of cases, longitudinal results, and observations on twin concordance. Arch Neurol. 1995; 52(8):763-71.
26. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-98.
27. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Data.gov. Medicare options compare [Internet]. Washington (DC): Data.gov; [last updated 2011 May 11; cited 2011 Jan 13]. Available from: http://explore.data.gov/ Social-Insurance-and-Human- Services/Medicare-Options- Compare/mqpq-uuhr
28. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CY 2009 Medicare options compare cohort selection and out-ofpocket cost estimates methodology [Internet]. Baltimore (MD): CMS; 2008 [cited 2011 Jan 13]. Available from: http://www.cms.gov/ ResearchGenInfo/downloads/Research_Calculation.pdf
29. To access the Appendix, click on the Appendix link in the box to the right of the article online.
30. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Medicare payment policy [Internet]. Washington (DC): MedPAC; 2009 [cited 2011 Jan 13]. Available from: http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Mar09_ EntireReport.pdf
31. Chaikind HR, Morgan PC. Report for Congress: Medicare Advantage payments [Internet]. Washington (DC): Congressional Research Service; 2004 [cited 2011 Jan 13]. Available from: http://www.law.umaryland .edu/marshall/crsreports/crsdocuments/RL32618.pdf
32. Chernew M, Decicca P, Town R. Managed care and medical expenditures of Medicare beneficiaries. J Health Econ. 2008;27(6):1451-61.
33. Frakt AB, Pizer SD, Feldman R. Payment reduction and Medicare private fee-for-service plans. Health Care Financ Rev. 2009;30(3):15-24.
34. Bach PB, McClellan MB. The first months of the prescription-drug benefit-a CMS update. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(22):2312-4.
35. Heeringa SG, Connor JH. Technical description of the Health and Retirement Survey sample design [Internet]. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan; 1995 [cited 2011 Jan 13]. (Survey Research Center Technical Report). Available from: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/ sitedocs/userg/HRSSAMP.pdf
36. Lohr SL. Sampling: design and analysis. Pacific Grove (CA): Duxbury Press; 1999.
37. Glazer J, McGuire TG. Private employers don't need formal risk adjustment. Inquiry. 2001;38(3): 260-9.
38. Harris-Kojetin LD, Uhrig JD, Williams P, Bann C, Frentzel EM, McCormack L, et al. The "choose with care system"-development of education materials to support informed Medicare health plan choices. J Health Commun. 2007; 12(2):133-56.
39. McCormack LA, Garfinkel SA, Hibbard JH, Keller SD, Kilpatrick KE, Kosiak B. Health insurance knowledge among Medicare beneficiaries. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(1):43-63.
40. McCormack LA, Uhrig JD. How does beneficiary knowledge of the Medicare program vary by type of insurance? Med Care. 2003;41(8):972-8.
41. Mikels JA, Reed AE, Simon KI. Older adults place lower value on choice relative to young adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009;64(4): 443-6.
42. Uhrig JD, Bann CM, McCormack LA, Rudolph N. Beneficiary knowledge of original Medicare and Medicare managed care. Med Care. 2006; 44(11):1020-9.
43. Uhrig JD, Harris-Kojetin L, Bann C, Kuo TM. Do content and format affect older consumers' use of comparative information in a Medicare health plan choice? Results from a controlled experiment. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63(6):701-18.
44. Frank RG, Zeckhauser RJ. Health insurance exchanges-making the markets work. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1135-7.
45. Kingsdale J. Health insurance exchanges- key link in a better-value chain. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(23):2147-50.
46. Gold M. Medicare Advantage in 2006-2007: what Congress intended? Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(4):w445-55. DOI: 10.1377/ hlthaff.26.4.w445.