Untangling Locality and Orientation Constraints in the L2 Acquisition of Anaphoric Binding: A Feature-Based Approach

Language Acquisition

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 266-300

  Domínguez, Laura ^a   Hicks, Glyn ^a   Song, Hee Jeong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866332362     PISSN: 10489223     EISSN: 15327817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10489223.2012.712827     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Akiyama, Yasuhiro. 2002. Japanese adult learners' development of the locality condition on English reflexives. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(1): 27-54.
2. Andrei, Antonenko. 2011. On phases and tense dependency: Subjunctives and binding. Poster presented at the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, April 22, University of Arizona.
3. Atkinson, Martin. 2001. "Learnability and the acquisition of syntax". In Language acquisition and learnability, Edited by: Bertolo, Stefano. 15-80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Battistella, Edwin. 1989. Chinese reflexivization: A movement to INFL approach. Linguistics, 27: 987-1012.
5. Bennett, Susan. 1994. Interpretation of English reflexives by adolescent speakers of Serbo-Croatian. Second Language Research, 10(2): 125-156.
6. Bennett, Susan and Progovac, Ljiljana. 1998. "Morphological status of reflexives in second language acquisition". In The generative study of second language acquisition, Edited by: Flynn, Suzanne, Martohardjono, Gita and O'Neil, Wayne A. 187-214. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Canac-Marquis, Réjean. 2005. "Phases and binding of reflexives and pronouns in English". In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Edited by: Müller, Stefan. 482-502. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications.
8. Chien, Yu-Chin and Wexler, Kenneth. 1990. Children's knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1(3): 225-295.
9. 0 reflexive binding. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 19(1): 165-183.
10. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
11. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origins, and use, New York: Praeger.
12. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. "A minimalist program for linguistic theory". In The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Edited by: Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel J. 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. "Minimalist inquires: The framework". In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, Edited by: Martin, Roger, Michaels, David and Uriagereka, Juan. 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. "Derivation by phase". In Ken Hale: A life in language, Edited by: Kenstowicz, Michael. 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Chomsky, Noam. 2004. "Beyond explanatory adequacy". In Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, Edited by: Belletti, Adriana. 104-131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Chomsky, Noam. 2007. "Approaching UG from below". In Interfaces + recursion = language?: Chomsky's minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics, Edited by: Sauerland, Uli and Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 1-29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Christie, Katrien and Lantolf, James P. 1998. "Bind me up and bind me down: Reflexives in L2". In The generative study of second language acquisition, Edited by: Flynn, Suzanne, Martohardjono, Gita and O'Neil, Wayne A. 239-260. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Cole, Peter, Hermon, Gabriella and Sung, Li-May. 1990. Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(1): 1-22.
19. Cole, Peter and Sung, Li-May. 1994. Head movement and long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(3): 355-406.
20. Crain, Stephen and Pietroski, Paul. 2001. Nature, nurture and Universal Grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24: 139-185.
21. Domínguez, Laura, Arche, María J. and Myles, Florence. 2011. "Testing the predictions of the Feature Assembly Hypothesis: Evidence from the L2 acquisition of Spanish aspect morphology". In Proceedings of the 35th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD 35], Edited by: Danis, Nick, Mesh, Kate and Sung, Hyunsuk. 183-196. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
22. Eckman, Fred R. 1994. "Local and long-distance anaphora in second-language acquisition". In Research methodology in second-language acquisition, Edited by: Tarone, Elaine E., Gass, Susan M. and Cohen, Andrew D. 207-225. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Epstein, Samuel, Groat, Erich M., Kawashima, Ruriko and Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1998. A derivational approach to syntactic relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Faltz, Leonard. 1977. Reflexivization: A study in universal syntax, Berkley, CA: University of California dissertation.
25. Finer, Daniel L. 1991. "Binding parameters in second language acquisition". In Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language, Edited by: Eubank, Lynn. 351-374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Finer, Daniel L. and Broselow, Ellen I. 1986. Second language acquisition of reflexive binding. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, 16: 154-168.
27. Freidin, Robert. 1997. "Binding theory on minimalist assumptions". In Perspectives on binding and atomism, Edited by: Bennis, Hans, Pica, Pierre and Rooryck, Johan. 141-153. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
28. Fukui, Naoki. 1984. Studies in Japanese anaphora. Ms. University of Massachusetts Amherst
29. Gallego, Ángel J. 2010. Binding through Agree. Linguistic Analysis, 34(3/4): 163-192.
30. Gallego, Ángel J. 2011. "Parameters". In The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, Edited by: Boeckx, Cedric. 523-550. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Gil, Kook-Hee. 1998. "Topic and binding in Korean". In Proceedings of the University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Conference 1-12. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/pgc/archive/1998/index.html (15 July, 2011)
32. Gil, Kook-Hee. 2000. A formal approach to long-distance anaphora: The case of Korean, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh dissertation.
33. Hamilton, Robert. 1998. Underdetermined binding of reflexives by adult Japanese-speaking learners of English. Second Language Research, 14(3): 292-320.
34. Chung-hye, Han and Storoshenko, Dennis R. 2009. "A bound-variable analysis of the Korean anaphor caki: Evidence from corpus". In Current Issues in Unity and Diversity of Languages: Collection of the Papers Selected from the 18th International Congress of Linguistics, The Linguistic Society of Korea. http://www.cil18.org/new_html/10_publications/publications_01.php (15 July, 2011)
35. Heinat, Fredrik. 2008. Probes, pronouns and binding in the minimalist program, Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
36. Hicks, Glyn. 2009. The derivation of anaphoric relations, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. Hirakawa, Makiko. 1990. A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives. Second language Research, 6(1): 60-85.
38. Hornstein, Norbert. 2001. Move! A minimalist theory of construal, Oxford: Blackwell.
39. Hornstein, Norbert. 2006. Pronouns in a minimalist setting. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 14: 47-80.
40. Huang, C.-T. James. 1983. A note on the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 14: 554-561.
41. Huang, C.-T. James and Jane Tang, C.-C. 1991. "The local nature of long distance reflexive in Chinese". In Long distance anaphora, Edited by: Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric. 263-282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Ionin, Tania. 2011. "Formal theory-based methodologies". In Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide, Edited by: Mackey, Alison and Gass, Susan M. 30-52. Oxford: Blackwell.
43. Jiang, Lin. 2009. A referential/quantified asymmetry in the second language acquisition of English reflexives by Chinese-speaking learners. Second Language Research, 25(4): 469-491.
44. Katada, Fusa. 1991. The LF representation of anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry, 22(2): 287-313.
45. Kayne, Richard S. 2002. "Pronouns and their antecedents". In Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, Edited by: Epstein, Samuel D. and Daniel Seely, T. 133-166. Oxford: Blackwell.
46. Koster, Jan. 1991. Long-distance anaphora, Edited by: Reuland, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Lakshmanan, Usha and Teranishi, Keiko. 1994. "Preferences versus grammaticality judgments: Some methodological issues concerning the governing category parameter in second-language acquisition". In Research methodology in second-language acquisition, Edited by: Tarone, Elaine E., Gass, Susan M. and Cohen, Andrew D. 185-206. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Lardiere, Donna. 2008. "Feature assembly in second language acquisition". In The role of formal features in second language acquisition, Edited by: Liceras, Juana, Zobl, Helmut and Goodluck, Helen. 106-140. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Lardiere, Donna. 2009. Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2): 173-227.
50. Lebeaux, David. 1983. A distributional difference between reciprocals and reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 14: 723-730.
51. Lee, Gunsoo. 2001. A minimalist account of long-distance anaphor kucasin. Studies in Generative Grammar, 11(2): 383-404.
52. Lee-Schoenfeld, Vera. 2004. Binding by phase: (Non-)complementarity in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 16(2): 111-173.
53. MacLaughlin, Dawn. 1998. "The acquisition of the morphosyntax of English reflexives by non-native speakers". In Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge, Edited by: Beck, Maria-Luise. 195-226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
54. Macmillan Publishers Limited. 2007. Straightforward quick placement and diagnostic test. http://www.macmillanstraightforward.com/resources/tests/ (http://www.macmillanstraightforward.com/resources/tests/) (Accessed: 22 February 2010).
55. Manzini, M. Rita and Wexler, Kenneth. 1987. Parameters, binding theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(3): 413-444.
56. Matsumura, Masanori. 1994. Japanese learners' acquisition of the locality requirement of English reflexives. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16: 19-42.
57. Pica, Pierre. 1987. "On the nature of the reflexivization cycle". In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society, Edited by: McDonough, Joyce and Plunkett, Bernadette. 483-500. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
58. Pica, Pierre. 1991. "On the interaction between antecedent-government and binding: The case of long-distance reflexivization". In Long-distance anaphora, Edited by: Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric. 119-135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Pollard, Carl and Sag, Ivan. 1992. Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 23: 261-303.
60. Quicoli, A. Carlos. 2008. Anaphora by phase. Syntax, 11(3): 299-329.
61. Reinhart, Tanya and Reuland, Eric. 1991. "Anaphors and logophors: An argument structure perspective". In Long-distance anaphora, Edited by: Koster, Jan and Reuland, Eric. 283-321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Reinhart, Tanya and Reuland, Eric. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 24: 657-720.
63. Reuland, Eric. 2001. Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 32: 439-492.
64. Reuland, Eric. 2005. "Binding conditions: How are they derived?". In The Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Edited by: Müller, Stefan. 578-593. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications.
65. Reuland, Eric. 2011. Anaphora and language design, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Schmitt, Cristina and Miller, Karen. 2010. "Using comprehension methods in language acquisition research". In Experimental methods in language acquisition research, Edited by: Blom, Elma and Unsworth, Sharon. 35-56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
67. Schwartz, Bonnie D. and Sprouse, Rex A. 1994. "Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage". In Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, Edited by: Hoekstra, Teun and Schwartz, Bonnie D. 317-368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
68. Schwartz, Bonnie D. and Sprouse, Rex A. 1996. "L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model". In Second Language Research Vol. 12, 40-72.
69. 0 reflexivization in Chinese and Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar, 14(3): 375-396.
70. Thomas, Margaret. 1989. The interpretation of English reflexive pronouns by non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11: 281-303.
71. Thomas, Margaret. 1991. Universal Grammar and the interpretation of reflexives in a second language. Language, 67(2): 211-239.
72. Thomas, Margaret. 1993. Knowledge of reflexives in a second language, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
73. Thomas, Margaret. 1995. Acquisition of the Japanese reflexive zibun and movement of anaphors in logical form. Second Language Research, 11(3): 206-234.
74. Tsoulas, George. 2004. On a binding-theoretic argument for base generation of long distance scrambling. York Papers in Linguistics (Series 2), 1: 223-236.
75. Ueda, Masanobu. 1984. On a Japanese reflexive zibun: A non-parameterization approach. Ms. University of Massachusetts Amherst
76. Wakabayashi, Shigenori. 1996. The nature of interlanguage: SLA of English reflexives. Second Language Research, 12(3): 266-303.
77. Weert, Cécile F. van der. 2002. Nature or nurture: Structured information knowledge. Reading Working Papers in Linguistics, 6: 119-132.
78. White, Lydia. 1989. Universal Grammar and second language acquisition, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
79. White, Lydia. 1995. "Input, triggers and second language acquisition: Can binding be taught?". In Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy, Edited by: Eckman, Fred R., Highland, Diane, Lee, Peter W., Milcham, Jean and Weber, Rita R. 63-78. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
80. White, Lydia. 2003. Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. White, Lydia, Bruhn-Garavito, Joyce, Kawasaki, Takako, Pater, Joe and Prévost, Philippe. 1997. The researcher gave the subject a test about himself: Problems of ambiguity and preference in the investigation of reflexive binding. Language Learning, 47(1): 145-172.
82. Ying, H. G. 1999. Access to UG and language transfer: A study of L2 learners' interpretation of reconstruction in Chinese. Second Language Research, 15(1): 41-72.
83. Yip, Virginia and Tang, Gladys. 1998. "Acquisition of English reflexive binding by Cantonese learners". In Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge, Edited by: Beck, Maria-Luise. 165-193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
84. Yuan, Boping. 1998. Interpretation of binding and orientation of the Chinese reflexive ziji by English and Japanese speakers. Second Language Research, 14(4): 324-340.
85. Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2002. "Issues relating to a derivational theory of binding". In Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, Edited by: Epstein, Samuel D. and Daniel Seely, T. 269-304. Oxford: Blackwell.