The researcher gave the subject a test about himself: Problems of ambiguity and preference in the investigation of reflexive binding

Language Learning

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 145-172

  White, Lydia ^a   Bruhn Garavito, Joyce ^b   Kawasaki, Takako ^b   Pater, Joe ^b   Prévost, Philippe ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040569687     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0023-8333.41997004     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bennett, S. (1994). Interpretation of English reflexives by adolescent speakers of Serbo-Croatian. Second Language Research, 10, 125-156.
2. Bruhn-Garavito, J. (1995). L2 acquisition of verb complementation and Binding Principle B. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileman & R. Rutkowski (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 79-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
4. Cole, P., Hermon, G. & Sung, L.-M. 1990. Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 1-22.
5. Crain, S. & McKee, C. (1986). Acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society, 16, 94-110.
6. Eckman, F. (1994). Local and long-distance anaphora in second-language acquisition. In E. Tarone, S. Gass & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 207-225). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Finer, D. (1991). Binding parameters in second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 351-374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Finer, D. & Broselow, E. (1986). Second language acquisition of reflexive-binding. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society, 16, 154-168.
9. Hirakawa, M. (1990). A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives. Second Language Research, 6, 60-85.
10. Lakshmanan, U. & Teranishi, K. (1994). Preferences versus grammaticality judgments: Some methodological issues concerning the governing category parameter in second language acquisition. In S. Gass, A. Cohen & E. Tarone (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 185-206). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Lust, B. (1981). Constraints on anaphora in child language: A prediction for a universal. In S. Tavakolian (Ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Pica, P. (1987). On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. In J. McDonough & B. Plunkett (Eds.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society, 77, 483-500.
13. Progovac, L. (1993). Long-distance reflexives: Movement-to-Infl vs. relativized subject. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 755-772.
14. Solan, L. (1983). Pronominal reference: Child language and the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
15. Thomas, M. (1989). The interpretation of English reflexive pronouns by non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 281-303.
16. Thomas, M. (1991). Universal Grammar and the interpretation of reflexives in a second language. Language, 67, 211-239.
17. Thomas, M. (1993). Knowledge of reflexives in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Thomas, M. (1995). Acquisition of the Japanese reflexive zibun and movement of anaphors in Logical Form. Second Language Research, 11, 206-234.
19. Wakabayashi, S. (1996). The nature of interlanguage: SLA of reflexives. Second Language Research, 12, 266-303.
20. Wexler, K. & Manzini, R. (1987). Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter Setting (pp. 41-76). Dordrecht: Reidel.
21. White, L. (1995). Input, triggers and second language acquisition: Can binding be taught? In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileman & R. Rutkowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 63-78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. White, L., Hirakawa, M. & Kawasaki, T. (1996). Second language acquisition of long distance reflexives: effects and non-effects of input manipulation. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 12, 129-148.