Feature Assembly in Second Language Acquisition

The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 106-140

  Lardiere, Donna ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85144368793     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315085340-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Anderson, S. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Aoun, J., and Li, Y.-H. A. (2003). Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Baker, M.C. (2003). Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, adjectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Albany: SUNY Press.
6. Bodman, N.C. (1987). Spoken Amoy Hokkien. Ithaca, NY: Spoken Language Services.
7. Cheng, L.L.-S., and Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 509-542.
8. Choi, M.-H., and Lardiere, D. (2006). The interpretation of wh-in-situ in Korean second language acquisition. In A. Belletti, E. Bennati, C. Chesi, E. DiDomenico, and I. Ferrari (Eds.) Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2005 (pp. 125-135). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.
9. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Nethrlands: Foris.
10. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 15.
12. Chomsky, N. (1999). Derivation by phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 18.
13. Chomsky, N. (2001). Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 20.
14. Corbett, G. (2000). Number. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R., and Anderson, B. (1998). Interlanguage A-bar dependencies: Binding construals, null prepositions and universal grammar. Second Language Research, 14, 341-358.
16. Embick, D., and Noyer, R. (2001). Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 555-595.
17. Epstein, S.D., Flynn, S., and Martohardjono, G. (1996). Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 79, 677-758.
18. Freidin, R. (1999). Cyclicity and minimalism. In S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (Eds.), Working minima/ism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Goad, H., White, L., and Steele, J. (2003). Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or LI-constrained prosodie representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48, 243-263.
20. Guéron, J., and Lecarme, J. (2004). The syntax of time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Haegeman, L. (1988). The categorial status of modals and L2 acquisition. In S. Flynn and W. O’Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 252-276) Boston: Kluwer.
22. Hale, K. (1996). Can UG and LI be distinguished in L2 acquisition?
23. [Commentary on Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S., and Martohardjono, G. (1996). Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 728-730.
24. Halle, M., and Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20 (pp. 111-176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
26. Hawkins, R. (2003, September). “Representational deficit” theories of adult SLA: Evidence, counterevidence and implications. Invited plenary talk presented at Euro SLA, Edinburgh, UK.
27. Hawkins, R., and Chan, C. Y.-H. (1997). The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The “failed functional features hypothesis”. Second Language Research, 13, 187-226.
28. Hawkins, R., and Liszka, S. (2003). Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, and R. Towell (Eds.), The lexicon-syntax interface in second language acquisition (pp. 21-44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Hetzron, R. (1997). The Semitic languages. New York: Routledge.
30. Huang, C.-T.J. (1995). Logical form. In G. Webelhuth (Ed.), Government and binding theory and the minimalist program (pp. 125-175). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
31. Iatridou, S. (2000). The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 231-270.
32. Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Klein, E. C. (1993). Toward second language acquisition: A study of null prep. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
34. Klein, E. C. (2001). (Mis)construing null prepositions in L2 intergrammars: A commentary and proposal. Second Language Research, 17, 37-70.
35. Klein, W. (2000). An analysis of the German Perfekt. Language, 76, 358-382.
36. Kuhn, S. T., and Portner, P. (2002). Tense and time. In D. Gabbay and F. Guenther (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic (Vol. 6, pp. 277-346). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
37. Lardiere, D. (1998a). Case and tense in the “fossilized” steady state. Second Language Research, 14, 1-26.
38. Lardiere, D. (1998b). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14, 359-375.
39. Lardiere, D. (1999). Suppletive agreement in second language acquisition. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, and Ch. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of BUCLD 23 (pp. 386-396). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
40. Lardiere, D. (2000). Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 102-129). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
41. th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002, pp. 176-189). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
42. Lardiere, D. (2004). Knowledge of definiteness despite variable article omission in second language acquisition. In A. Brugos, L. Micciulla, and C. E. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of BUCLD 28 (pp. 328-339). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
43. Lardiere, D. (2007). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition: A case study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Lecarme, J. (2003). Nominal tense and evidentiality. In J. Guéron and L. Tamowski (Eds.), Tense and point of view (pp. 277-299). Nanterre, Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris X-Nanterre.
45. Lecarme, J. (2004). Tense in nominals. In J. Guéron and J. Lecarme (Eds.), The syntax of time (pp. 441-475). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Leung, Y.-K.I. (2001). The initial state of L3A: Full transfer and failed features? In X. Bonch-Bruevich, W. J. Crawford, J. Hellermann, Ch. Higgins, and H. Nguyen (Eds.), The past, present and future of second language research: Selected proceedings of SLRF 2000. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
47. Li, C., and Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48. Li, Y.-H.A. (2002). Word order, structure and relativization. In S.-W. Tang and C.-S.L. Liu (Eds.), On the formal way to Chinese languages (pp. 45-73). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
49. Lightbown, P., and Spada, N. (1993). How languages are learned. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50. Lightfoot, D. (1997). Shifting triggers and diachronic reanalyses. In A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change (pp. 253-272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Ludlow, P. (1999). Semantics, tense and time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Lust, B. (1988). Universal grammar in second language acquisition: Promises and problems in critically relating theory and empirical studies. In S. Flynn and W. O’Neil (Eds.) Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 309-328). Boston: Kluwer.
53. Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Marantz, A. (1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 201-225.
55. Martohardjono, G. and Gair, J. (1993). Apparent UG inaccessibility in second language acquisition: Misapplied principles or principled misapplications? In F. Eckman (Eds.), Confluence: Linguistics, L2 acquisition, and speech pathology (pp. 79-103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
56. McCloskey, J. (1979). Transformational syntax and model-theoretic semantics: a case-study in Modern Irish. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
57. Mithun, M. (1999). The languages of native North America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58. Mittelstaedt, J., and Parrott, J. (2002). A distributed morphology account of weren’t leveling. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 31, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
59. Ning, C. (1993). The overt syntax of relativization and topicalization in Chinese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
60. Ogihara, T. (2004, March). Does the past tense really mean “in the past”? Invited plenary talk presented at the Georgetown University RoundTable, Washington DC.
61. Parrott, J. (2002). The acquisition of vocabulary in Distributed Morphology. Unpublished ms., Georgetown University.
62. Pesetsky, D. and Torrego, E. (2001). T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 355-426). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Pesetsky, D. and Torrego, E. (2004). Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In J. Guéron and J. Lecarme (Eds.), The syntax of time (pp. 495-537). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., and Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 70, 217-243.
65. Radford, A. and Ramos, E. (2001). Case, agreement and EPP: Evidence from an English-speaking child with SLI. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 36.
66. Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16, 135-172.
67. Schiffrin, D. (1981). Tense variation in narrative. Language, 57, 45-62.
68. Solà, J. (1996). Morphology and word order in Germanic languages. In W. Abraham, S. D. Epstein, H. Thrainsson, and C. J.-W. Zwart (Eds.), Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework (pp. 217-251). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
69. Thrainsson, H. (1996). On the (non-)universality of functional categories. In W. Abraham, S. D. Epstein, H. Thrainsson, and C. J.-W. Zwart (eds.), Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework (pp. 253-281). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
70. Tsimpli, I. M. (2003, September). Features in language development. Invited plenary talk presented at EuroSLA, Edinburgh.
71. Tsimpli, I. M., and Roussou, A. (1991). Parameter resetting in L2? UCL Working Papers in Lingnistics, 3, 149-169.
72. van Kemenade, A., and Vincent, N. (1997). Introduction: Parameters and morphosyntactic change. In A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (Eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73. White, L. (2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 129-141.
74. Zhang, N. (2000). The reference time of tense and the Chinese sentence final le. Available at http://www.usc.edu/dept/LAS/ealc/chinling/articles/tense.htm