Comparative survey of rumen microbial communities and metabolites across one caprine and three bovine groups, using bar-coded pyrosequencing and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 17, 2012, Pages 5983-5993

  Lee, Hyo Jung ^a   Jung, Ji Young ^a   Oh, Young Kyoon ^b   Lee, Sang Suk ^c   Madsen, Eugene L ^d   Jeon, Che Ok ^a  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^b National Institute of Animal Science   (South Korea)

^c Sunchon National University   (South Korea)

^d Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

16S RRNA GENE; ARCHAEA; ARCHAEAL; BACTERIAL COMMUNITY; BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY ANALYSIS; DAIRY CATTLES; FIRMICUTES; GROWTH STAGES; KEY FACTORS; METABOLITE PROFILES; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; MICROBIOTAS; PYROSEQUENCING; STATISTICAL COMPARISONS;

AGRICULTURE; BACTERIA; BIOINFORMATICS; BIOMOLECULES; GENES; MAMMALS; MERCURY COMPOUNDS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; NUTRITION; RNA;

METABOLITES;

BACTERIAL DNA; RIBOSOME DNA; RNA 16S;

ABUNDANCE; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; BACTERIUM; BIOINFORMATICS; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTIVATION; DIET; GOAT; METABOLITE; METHANOGENESIS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NATIVE SPECIES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SPECTROSCOPY;

ANIMAL; ARCHAEON; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOTA; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DNA BARCODING; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; GOAT; KOREA; METABOLOME; METAGENOME; MICROBIOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; RUMINANT STOMACH;

ANIMALS; ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; BIOTA; CATTLE; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; DNA, BACTERIAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; GOATS; KOREA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; METABOLOME; METAGENOME; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; RUMEN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BACTEROIDETES; BOS; BOVINAE; CAPRA; CAPRA HIRCUS; FIBROBACTERES; FIRMICUTES; FRIESIA; PROTEOBACTERIA;

EID: 84866166160     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00104-12     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Ametaj BN, et al. 2010. Metabolomics reveals unhealthy alterations in rumen metabolism with increased proportion of cereal grain in the diet of dairy cows. Metabolomics 6:583-594.
2. Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM. 2006. Methane emissions from beef cattle: effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1489-1496.
3. 1HNMR spectroscopy. Livest. Sci. 120:127-134.
4. Binladen J, et al. 2007. The use of coded PCR primers enables high throughput sequencing of multiple homolog amplification products by 454 parallel sequencing. PLoS One 2:e197. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0000197.
5. Brulc JM, et al. 2009. Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:1948-1953.
6. Callaway TR, et al. 2010. Evaluation of bacterial diversity in the rumen and feces of cattle fed different levels of dried distillers grains plus solubles using bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing. J. Anim. Sci. 88:3977-3983.
7. Cao GR, English PB, Filippich LJ, Inglis S. 1987. Experimentally induced lactic acidosis in the goat. Aust. Vet. J. 64:367-370.
8. Chao A. 1987. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43:783-791.
9. Cho SJ, et al. 2006. 16S rDNA analysis of bacterial diversity in three fractions of cow rumen. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16:92-101.
10. Chun J, Kim K, Lee Choi J-HY. 2010. The analysis of oral microbial communities of wild-type and Toll-like receptor 2-deficient mice using a 454 GS FLX Titanium pyrosequencer. BMC Microbiol. 10:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-101.
11. Church DC. 1993. Ruminant animal: digestive physiology and nutrition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12. Cole JR, et al. 2009. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D141-D145.
13. Denman SE, McSweeney CS. 2006. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 58:572-582.
14. DeSantis TZ, et al. 2006. NAST: a multiple sequence alignment server for comparative analysis of 16S rRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:W394-W399.
15. DeSantis TZ, et al. 2006. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:5069-5072.
16. DeLong EF. 1992. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89:5685-5689.
17. Edwards E, McEwan NR, Travis AJ, Wallace RJ. 2004. 16S rDNA library-based analysis of ruminal bacterial diversity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 86:263-281.
18. Edwards RA, et al. 2006. Using pyrosequencing to shed light on deep mine microbial ecology. BMC Genomics 7:57.
19. Farrelly V, Rainey FA, Stackebrandt E. 1995. Effect of genome size and rrn gene copy number on PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes from a mixture of bacterial species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:2798-2801.
20. Felsenstein J. 2002. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), version 3.6a. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
21. 1H NMR, a rapid method to monitor organic acids during cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum Spreng) processing. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54:4102-4106.
22. Gu MJ, et al. 2011. Analysis of methanogenic archaeal communities of rumen fluid and rumen particles from Korean black goats. Anim. Sci. J. 82:663-672.
23. Guan LL, Nkrumah JD, Basarab JA, Moore SS. 2008. Linkage of microbial ecology to phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle's feed efficiency. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 288:85-91.
24. Hamady M, Walker JJ, Harris JK, Gold NJ, Knight R. 2008. Errorcorrecting bar-coded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex. Nat. Methods 5:235-237.
25. Hess M, et al. 2011. Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science 331:463-467.
26. Huber JA, et al. 2007. Microbial population structures in the deep marine biosphere. Science 318:97-100.
27. Humblot C, Guyot JP. 2009. Pyrosequencing of tagged 16S rRNA gene amplicons for rapid deciphering of the microbiomes of fermented foods such as pearl millet slurries. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:4354-4361.
28. Janssen PH, Kirs M. 2008. Structure of the archaeal community of the rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:3619-3625.
29. Jung JY, et al. 2011. Metagenomic analysis of kimchi, a traditional Korean fermented food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:2264-2274.
30. Kamra DN. 2005. Rumen microbial ecosystem. Curr. Sci. 89:124-135.
31. Kim M, Morrison M, Yu Z. 2011. Status of the phylogenetic diversity census of ruminal microbiomes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 76:49-63.
32. Kong Y, Teather R, Forster R. 2010. Composition, spatial distribution, and diversity of the bacterial communities in the rumen of cows fed different forages. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 74:612-622.
33. Kurihara Y, Eadie JM, Hobson PN, Mann SO. 1968. Relationship between bacteria and ciliate protozoa in the sheep rumen. J. Gen. Microbiol. 51:267-288.
34. Lange M, Westermann P, Ahring BK. 2005. Archaea in protozoa and metazoa. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 66:465-474.
35. Li RW, Connor EE, Li C, Baldwin Vi RL, Sparks ME. 2011. Characterization of the rumen microbiota of pre-ruminant calves using metagenomic tools. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02543.x.
36. Li W, Godzik A. 2006. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22:1658-1659.
37. Lin C, Raskin L, Stahl DA. 1997. Microbial community structure of gastrointestinal tracts of domestic animals: comparative analyses using rRNA targeted oligonucleotide probes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 22:281-294.
38. Liu Y, Whitman WB. 2008. Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1125:171-189.
39. Lozupone C, Knight R. 2005. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:8228-8235.
40. Mackie RI, Aminov RI, White BA, McSweeney CS. 2000. Molecular ecology and diversity in gut microbial ecosystems, p 61-78. In Cronje PB (ed), Ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism, growth and reproduction. CABI Publishing, Oxon, United Kingdom.
41. Margulies M, et al. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated highdensity picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376-380.
42. Martin AP. 2002. Phylogenetic approaches for describing and comparing the diversity of microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbial 38:3673-3682.
43. National Institute of Animal Science. 2007. Korean feeding standard for Hanwoo. Korean Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Korea.
44. Or-Rashid MM, Al Zahal O, McBride BW. 2008. Studies on the production of conjugated linoleic acid from linoleic and vaccenic acids by mixed rumen protozoa. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 81:533-541.
45. Purser DB, Moir RJ. 1959. Ruminal flora studies in the sheep. IX. The effect of pH on the ciliate population of the rumen in vivo. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 10:555-564.
46. Qian P-Y, et al. 2011. Vertical stratification of microbial communities in the Red Sea revealed by 16S rDNA pyrosequencing. ISME J. 5:507-518.
47. Quince C, et al. 2009. Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data. Nat. Methods 6:639-641.
48. Roesch LF, et al. 2007. Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. ISME J. 1:283-290.
49. Roh SW, et al. 2010. Investigation of archaeal and bacterial diversity in fermented seafood using bar-coded pyrosequencing. ISME J. 4:1-16.
50. Ruiz G, Bobadilla M, Hovell FDD. 1977. The effect of wheat bran on rumen fermentation, rumen volume and fluid flow rate in Zebu bulls fed chopped whole sugar cane. Trop. Anim. Prod. 3:247-258.
51. Russell JB, Hespell RB. 1981. Microbial rumen fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 64:1153-1169.
52. Schloss PD, et al. 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platformindependent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:7537-7541.
53. Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
54. Sharp R, Ziemer CJ, Stern MD, Stahl DA. 1998. Taxon-specific associations between protozoal and methanogen populations in the rumen and a model rumen system. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 26:71-78.
55. Sogin ML, et al. 2006. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored 'rare biosphere'. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:12115-12120.
56. Sorensen KB, Teske A. 2006. Stratified communities of active archaea in deep marine subsurface sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:4596-4603.
57. Stewart CS, Paniagua C, Dinsdale D, Cheng Garrow K-JS. 1981. Selective isolation and characteristics of Bacteroides succinogenes from the rumen of a cow. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41:504-510.
58. Stewart CS, Flint HJ. 1989. Bacteroides (Fibrobacter) succinogenes, a cellulolytic anaerobic bacterium from the gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30:433-439.
59. Sun YZ, Mao SY, Zhu WY. 2010. Rumen chemical and bacterial changes during stepwise adaptation to a high-concentrate diet in goats. Animal 4:210-217.
60. Sylvester JT, Karnati SK, Yu Z, Morrison M, Firkins JL. 2004. Development of an assay to quantify rumen ciliate protozoal biomass in cows using real-time PCR. J. Nutr. 134:3378-3384.
61. Tajima K, et al. 1999. Rumen bacterial diversity as determined by sequence analysis of 16S rDNA libraries. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 29:159-169.
62. Tajima K, et al. 2001. Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:2766-2774.
63. Tajima K, et al. 2007. Influence of high temperature and humidity on rumen bacterial diversity in Holstein heifers. Anaerobe 13:57-64.
64. Takai K, Horikoshi K. 2000. Rapid detection and quantification of members of the archaeal community by quantitative PCR using fluorogenic probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:5066-5072.
65. Tamura K, et al. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum-likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximumparsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731-2739.
66. Thorpe A. 2009. Enteric fermentation and ruminant eructation: the role (and control?) of methane in the climate change debate. Clim. Change 93:407-431.
67. Wheeler WE, Noller CH. 1977. Gastrointestinal tract pH and starch in feces of ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 44:131-135.
68. Williams AG, Coleman GS. 1997. The rumen protozoa, p 73-139. In Hobson PN, Stewart CS (ed), The rumen microbial ecosystem. Blackie Academic and Professional Publishers, London, United Kingdom.
69. Wright AD, et al. 2004. Molecular diversity of rumen methanogens from sheep in Western Australia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:1263-1270.
70. Zhou J, et al. 2011. Reproducibility and quantitation of amplicon sequencing-based detection. ISME J. 5:1303-1313.
71. Zhou J, Kang S, Schadt CW, Garten CT. 2008. Spatial scaling of functional gene diversity across various microbial taxa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:7768-7773.
72. Zhou M, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Guan LL. 2009. Assessment of the microbial ecology of ruminal methanogens in cattle with different feed efficiencies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:6524-6533.