The emerging industry puzzle: Optics unplugged

Beyond Territory: Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Innovation

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 107-148

  Feldman, Maryann P ^a   Lendel, Iryna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866161108     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Abernathy, W.J. and Utterback, J.M. (1978). "Patterns of industrial innovation." Technology Review, June/July: 40-17.
2. Adams, S. (2001). "Comparing the IPC and the US classification systems for the patent searcher." World Patent Information, 23: 15-23.
3. Anderson, P. and Tushman, M. (1990). "Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change." Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 604-633.
4. Antonelli, C. (2000). "Collective knowledge communication and innovation: the evidence of technological districts." Regional Studies, 34(6): 535-547.
5. Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M. (1996). "Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle." Review of Industrial Organization, 11(2): 253-273.
6. Bhojraj, S. and Sengupta, P. (2003). "Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: the role of institutional investors and outside directors." Journal of Business, 76(3): 455-476.
7. Boschma, R. and Frenken, K. (2003). "Evolutionary economics and industry location." Review for Regional Research, 23: 183-200.
8. Boshma, R. and Frenken, K. (2006). "Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography." Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3): 273-302.
9. Boschma, R. and Wenting, R. (2007). "The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: does location matter?" Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2): 213-238.
10. Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F. (2001). "Localized knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: knowledge 'tacitness' reconsidered." Papers in Regional Science, 80(3): 255-273.
11. Camagni, R. (ed.) (1991). Innovation Networks: Special Perspectives. Belhaven Press, London.
12. Carliner, G. (1986). "Industrial policies for emerging industries." In P. Krugman (Ed.), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics (pp. 147-168). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J.P. (2000). "Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not)." Working Paper no. W7552, National Bureau of Economic Research.
14. Cooke, P. (2001). "Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy." Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4): 945-974.
15. Cooke, P. (2002). Knowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage. New York: Routledge.
16. Feldman, M. (1999). "The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: a review of empirical studies." Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1): 5-26.
17. Feldman, M.P. and Lendel, I. (2009). "Under the lens: the geography of optical science as an emerging industry." Economic Geography, 86(2): 147-171.
18. Glaeser, F., Kallal, H. and Schleifer, A. (1992). "Growth in cities." Journal of Political Economy, 100: 1126-1152.
19. Grier, K.B., Munger, M.C. and Roberts, B.E. (1994). "The determinants of industry political activity 1978-1986." American Political Science Review, 88(4): 911-926.
20. Hall, B.H. and Ziedonis, R.H. (2001). "The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995." RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1): 101-128.
21. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. (1998). "Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988." Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1): 119-127.
22. Hendry, C., Brown, J. and Defillippi, R. (2000). "Regional clustering of high technology-based firms: opto-electronics in three countries." Regional Studies, 34(2): 129-144.
23. Hendry, C., Brown, J., Ganter, H.D. and Hilland, S. (2003). "Facilitating innovation in opto-electronics in a national, global, and regional context. Environment and Planning C." Government and Policy, 21(1): 53-70.
24. Holton, Conrad W. (2000). Think globally, cluster locally (Marketwatch). Laser Focus World, 36(1). Available from: http://www.optoiq.com/index/photonics-technologies-applications/lfw-display/lfw-article-display/57160/articles/laser-focus-world/volume-36/issue-1/departments/marketwatch/marketwatch-think-globally-cluster-locally.html.
25. Immarino, S. (2005). "An evolutionary integrated view of regional systems of innovation: concepts measures and historical perspectives." European Planning Studies, 13(4): 497-519.
26. International Society for Optical Engineering (2006). Available from: www.spie.org.
27. Jaffe, A.B. and Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.
28. Jonovich, B. and MacDonald, G.M. (1994). "The life cycle of a competitive industry." Journal of Political Economy, 102(2): 322-347.
29. Kaounides, L.C. (1995). "Advanced materials." Financial Times.
30. Klepper, S. (1996). "Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle." American Economic Review, 86(3): 562-583.
31. Klepper, S. (1997). "Industry life cycles." Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1): 145-181.
32. Krugman, P. (1991). "Increasing returns and economic geography." Journal of Political Economy, 99: 438-499.
33. McGahan, A.M and Porter, M.E. (1997). "How much does industry matter, really?" Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1): 15-30.
34. Markusen, A. (1994). "Studying regions by studying firms." Professional Geographer, 46(4): 477-490.
35. Merges, R.P. and Nelson, R.R. (1990). "On the complex economics of patent scope." Columbia Law Review, 90: 839-916.
36. Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., Sampat, B. and Ziedonis, A.A. (2001). "The effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on U.S. university research and technology transfer: an analysis of data from Columbia University, the University of California, and Stanford University." Research Policy, 30: 99-119.
37. National Research Council (1998). Harnessing Light: Optical Science and Engineering for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38. NSF (National Science Foundation) (2006). Available from: www.nsf.gov/.
39. Office of Management and Budget (2003). Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, Combined Statistical Areas, New England City and Town Areas, and Combined New England City and Towns Areas (2003) Bulletin No. 03-04, Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.
40. Optical Society of America (OSA) (2009). "Advancing the science and technology of light." Available from: www.osa.org/.
41. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (1993). Technology Fusion: A Path to Innovation. The Case of Opto-Electronics. Paris: OECD.
42. Parrino, R. (1997). "CEO turnover and outside succession: a cross-sectional analysis." Journal of Financial Economics, 46(2): 165-197.
43. Plein, L.C. (1991). "Popularizing biotechnology: the influence of issue definition." Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(4): 474-490.
44. Powell, W.W. and Owen-Smith, J. (1998). "Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(2): 253-277.
45. Powell, W.W. and Owen-Smith, J. (2002). "The new world of knowledge production in the life-sciences." In Steven G. Brint (Ed.), The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
46. Romer, P. (1990). "Endogenous technological change." Journal of Political Economy, 98: 71-102.
47. Rosenkopf, L. and Nerkar, A. (2001). "Beyond local search: boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry." Strategic Management Journal, 22: 287-306.
48. Schumpeter, J.A. (1911). Theory of Economic Development. Berlin: Duncker and Humbolt.
49. Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
50. Sternberg, E. (1992). Photonic Technology and Industrial Policy: U.S. Responses to Technological Change. Albany: State University of New York Press.
51. Storper, M. (1989). "The transition to flexible specialisation in the US film industry: external economies, the division of labour, and the crossing of industrial divides." Cambridge Journal of Economics, 13(2): 273-305.
52. Sydow, J., Lerch, F., Huxham, C. and Hibbert, P. (2007). Developing Photonics Clusters: Commodities, Contracts and Contradictions. London: Advanced Institute of Management Research.
53. Thursby, J. and Kemp, S. (2002). "Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing." Research Policy, 31(1): 109-124.
54. Tyler, R. (2009) "Budget 2009: government to back emerging industries to win in high-value markets." Available from: www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/5183415/Budget-2009-Government-to-back-emerging-industries-to-win-in-high-value-markets.html.
55. United States Census Bureau (2009). North American Classification System (NAICS). Available from: www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/.
56. United States Department of Labor (2009). Standard Industrial Classification Scheme. Available from: www.osha.gov/pls/imis/sicsearch.html.
57. Utterback, J.M. and Abernathy, W.J. (1975). "A dynamic model of process and product innovation." Omega, 3(6): 639-656.
58. Utterback, J.M. and Suares, F.F. (1993). "Innovation, competition, and industry structure." Research Policy, 22: 1-21.
59. Vernon, R. (1966). "International investment and international trade in the product cycle." Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2): 190-207.
60. Waits, M.J. (2000). "The added value of the industry cluster approach to economic analysis, strategy development, and service delivery." Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1): 35-50.
61. Weitzman, M.L. (1998). "Recombinant growth." Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2): 331-360.
62. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) (1997) Guide to Classifications. Available from www.wipo.int/classifications/fulltext/new_ipc/ipcen.html.
63. Zajac, E.J. (1988). "Interlocking directorates as an interorganizational strategy: a test of critical assumptions." The Academy ofManagement Journal, 31(2): 428-438.
64. Zucker, L., Darby, M. and Brewer, M. (1998). "Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises." The American Economic Review, 88(1): 290-306.