3D-RISM-Dock: A new fragment-based drug design protocol

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 3356-3372

  Nikolić, Dragan ^a   Blinov, Nikolay ^a,b   Wishart, David ^b   Kovalenko, Andriy ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866150181     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: 15499626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct300257v     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. McInnes, C. Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2007, 11, 494-502
2. Schneider, G. Virtual screening: an endless staircase? Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2010, 9, 273-276
3. Shoichet, B. K. Virtual screening of chemical libraries Nature 2004, 432, 862-865
4. Venkatraman, V.; Pérez-Nueno, V. I.; Mavridis, L.; Ritchie, D. W. Comprehensive Comparison of Ligand-Based Virtual Screening Tools Against the DUD Data set Reveals Limitations of Current 3D Methods J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 2079-2093
5. von Korff, M.; Freyss, J.; Sander, T. Comparison of Ligand- and Structure- Based Virtual Screening on the DUD Data Set J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 209-231
6. Köppen, H. Virtual screening-what does it give us Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2009, 12, 397-407
7. Chen, Y.; Shoichet, B. K. Molecular docking and ligand specificity in fragment based inhibitor discovery Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 358-364
8. Recanatini, M.; Bottegoni, G.; Cavalli, A. In silico antitarget screening Drug Discovery Today 2004, 1, 209-215
9. Dill, K. A. Additivity Principles in Biochemistry J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 701-704
10. Pagadala, N. S.; Blinov, N.; Bjorndahl, T.; Wishart, D. S.; Kovalenko, A. Water and Ions Play Important Role in Binding of Thiamine and its Derivatives to Prion Protein. 2012, in preparation.
11. Kovalenko, A. In Molecular Theory of Solvation; Hirata, F., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; Vol. 36, Chapter 4. Three-Dimensional RISM Theory for Molecular Liquids and Solid-Liquid Interfaces, pp 169-275.
12. Stumpe, M. C.; Blinov, N.; Wishart, D.; Kovalenko, A.; Pande, V. S. Calculation of Local Water Densities in Biological Systems: A Comparison of Molecular Dynamics Simulations and the 3D-RISM-KH Molecular Theory of Solvation J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 319-328
13. Imai, T.; Oda, K.; Kovalenko, A.; Hirata, F.; Kidera, A. Ligand Mapping on Protein Surfaces by the 3D-RISM Theory: Toward Computational Fragment-Based Drug Design J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12430-12440
14. Kiyota, Y.; Yoshida, N.; Hirata, F. A New Approach for Investigating the Molecular Recognition of Protein: Toward Structure-Based Drug Design Based on the 3D-RISM Theory J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 3803-3815
15. Muegge, I. PMF Scoring Revisited J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5895-5902
16. Huey, R.; Morris, G. M.; Olson, A. J.; Goodsell, D. S. A semiempirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 28, 1145-1152
17. Sousa, S. F.; Fernandes, P. A.; Ramos, M. J. Protein-ligand docking: Current status and future challenges Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2006, 65, 15-26
18. Park, H.; Lee, J.; Lee, S. Critical assessment of the automated A uto D ock as a new docking tool for virtual screening Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2006, 65, 549-554
19. Goodsell, D. S.; Morris, G. M.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking of flexible ligands: Applications of A uto D ock J. Mol. Recognit. 1996, 9, 1-5
20. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662
21. Morris, G. M.; Huey, R.; Lindstrom, W.; Sanner, M. F.; Belew, R. K.; Goodsell, D. S.; Olson, A. J. A uto D ock 4 and A uto D ock Tools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 2785-2791
22. Cosconati, S.; Forli, S.; Perryman, A. L.; Harris, R.; Goodsell, D. S.; Olson, A. J. Virtual screening with A uto D ock: theory and practice Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2010, 5, 597-607
23. Mezei, M.; Zhou, M. M. Dockres: a computer program that analyzes the output of virtual screening of small molecules Source Code Biol. Med. 2010, 5, 1-6
24. Durrant, J. D.; Amaro, R. E.; McCammon, J. A. AutoGrow: A Novel Algorithm for Protein Inhibitor Design Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2009, 73, 168-178
25. Ördög, R.; Grolmusz, V. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics Research and Applications; Mǎndoiu, I.; Sunderraman, R.; Zelikovsky, A., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2008; ISBRA 2008, pp 402-413.
26. Atilgan, E.; Hu, J. Improving Protein Docking Using Sustainable Genetic Algorithms Int. J. Comput., Inf., Syst., Ind. Man. 2011, 3, 248-255
27. Atilgan, E.; Hu, J. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation; GECCO; ACM: New York, 2010; pp 211-212.
28. Trott, O.; Olson, A. J. A uto D ock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 455-461
29. Antes, I. DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics-based algorithm for protein-peptide docking including receptor flexibility Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2010, 78, 1084-1104
30. de Magalhães, C. S.; Barbosa, H. J. C.; Dardenne, L. E. A genetic algorithm for the ligand-protein docking problem Genet. Mol. Biol. 2004, 27, 605-610
31. Thomsen, R. Flexible ligand docking using evolutionary algorithms: investigating the effects of variation operators and local search hybrids BioSystems 2003, 72, 57-73
32. Buzko, O. V.; Bishop, A. C.; Shokat, K. M. Modified A uto D ock for accurate docking of protein kinase inhibitors J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 113-127
33. Norgan, A.; Coffman, P.; Kocher, J.-P.; Katzmann, D.; Sosa, C. Multilevel Parallelization of A uto D ock 4.2 J. Cheminf. 2011, 3, 12-20
34. Collignon, B.; Schulz, R.; Smith, J. C.; Baudry, J. Task-parallel message passing interface implementation of Autodock4 for docking of very large databases of compounds using high-performance super-computers J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1202-1209
35. Prakhov, N. D.; Chernorudskiy, A. L.; Gainullin, M. R. VSDocker: a tool for parallel high-throughput virtual screening using A uto D ock on Windows-based computer clusters Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 1374-1375
36. Zhang, S.; Kumar, K.; Jiang, X.; Wallqvist, A.; Reifman, J. DOVIS: an implementation for high-throughput virtual screening using A uto D ock BMC Bioinf. 2008, 9, 126-129
37. Jiang, X.; Kumar, K.; Hu, X.; Wallqvist, A.; Reifman, J. DOVIS 2.0: an efficient and easy to use parallel virtual screening tool based on A uto D ock 4.0 Chem. Cent. J. 2008, 2, 1-7
38. Khodade, P.; Prabhu, R.; Chandra, N.; Raha, S.; Govindarajan, R. Parallel implementation of A uto D ock J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2007, 40, 598-599
39. Thormann, M.; Pons, M. Massive docking of flexible ligands using environmental niches in parallelized genetic algorithms J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 1971-1982
40. Wishart, D. S.; Lewis, M. J.; Morrissey, J. A.; Flegel, M. D.; Jeroncic, K.; Xiong, Y.; Cheng, D.; Eisner, R.; Gautam, B.; Tzur, D.; Sawhney, S.; Bamforth, F.; Greiner, R.; Li, L. The human cerebrospinal fluid metabolome J. Chromatogr. B 2008, 871, 164-173
41. Wishart, D. S.; Knox, C.; Guo, A. C.; Eisner, R.; Young, N.; Gautam, B.; Hau, D. D.; Psychogios, N.; Dong, E.; Bouatra, S.; Mandal, R.; Sinelnikov, I.; Xia, J.; Jia, L.; Cruz, J. A.; Lim, E.; Sobsey, C. A.; Shrivastava, S.; Huang, P.; Liu, P.; Fang, L.; Peng, J.; Fradette, R.; Cheng, D.; Tzur, D.; Clements, M.; Lewis, A.; De Souza, A.; Zuniga, A.; Dawe, M.; Xiong, Y.; Clive, D.; Greiner, R.; Nazyrova, A.; Shaykhutdinov, R.; Li, L.; Vogel, H. J.; Forsythe, I. HMDB: a knowledgebase for the human metabolome Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D603-D610
42. Perez-Pineiro, R.; Bjorndahl, T. C.; Berjanskii, M. V.; Hau, D.; Li, L.; Huang, A.; Lee, R.; Gibbs, E.; Ladner, C.; Dong, Y. W.; Abera, A.; Cashman, N. R.; Wishart, D. S. The prion protein binds thiamine FEBS J. 2011, 1-13
43. Ben-Naim, A. Molecular Theory of Solutions; Oxford University Press: New York, 2006.
44. Hansen, J. P.; McDonald, I. R. Theory of Simple Liquids, 3 rd ed.; Academic Press; Elsevier Academic Press: Waltham, MA, 2006; Chapter IV: Distribution-Function Theories, pp 97-103.
45. Chandler, D.; Andersen, H. C. Optimized Cluster Expansions for Classical Fluids. II. Theory of Molecular Liquids J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 57, 1930-1937
46. Chandler, D.; McCoy, J. D.; Singer, S. J. Density functional theory of nonuniform polyatomic systems. I. General formulation J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 85, 5971-5976
47. Chandler, D.; McCoy, J. D.; Singer, S. J. Density functional theory of nonuniform polyatomic systems. II. Rational closures for integral equations J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 85, 5977-5982
48. Beglov, D.; Roux, B. An Integral Equation To Describe the Solvation of Polar Molecules in Liquid Water J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 7821-7826
49. Kovalenko, A.; Hirata, F. Potentials of mean force of simple ions in ambient aqueous solution. I. Three-dimensional reference interaction site model approach J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 10391-10402
50. Kovalenko, A.; Hirata, F. Potentials of mean force of simple ions in ambient aqueous solution. II. Solvation structure from the three-dimensional reference interaction site model approach, and comparison with simulations J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 10403-10417
51. Kovalenko, A.; Hirata, F. Self-consistent description of a metal-water interface by the Kohn-Sham density functional theory and the three-dimensional reference interaction site model J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 10095-10112
52. Perkyns, J. S.; Pettitt, B. M. A dielectrically consistent interaction site theory for solvent-electrolyte mixtures Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 190, 626-630
53. Perkyns, J. S.; Pettitt, B. M. A site-site theory for finite concentration saline solutions J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 7656-7666
54. Rosenfeld, Y.; Ashcroft, N. W. Theory of simple classical fluids: Universality in the short-range structure Phys. Rev. A 1979, 20, 1208-1235
55. Lee, L. L. In Molecular Thermodynamics of Nonideal Fluids; Brenner, H., Ed.; Butterworths series in chemical engineering; Butterworth-Heinemann: Boston, MA, 1988; Chapter VI: Integral Equation Theories, pp 133-184.
56. Martynov, G. A. Fundamental Theory of Liquids: Method of Distribution Functions; Adam Hilger: New York, 1992; Chapter V: Fundamental Equations of Statistical Mechanics, pp 122-156.
57. Duh, D. M.; Haymet, A. D. J. Integral equation theory for uncharged liquids: The Lennard-Jones fluid and the bridge function J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 2625-2633
58. Monson, P. A.; Morriss, G. P. In Advances in Chemical Physics; Prigogine, I.; Rice, S. A., Eds.; JohnWiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2007; Vol. 77; Chapter VIII: Recent Progress in the Statistical Mechanical Mechanics of Interaction Site Fluids, pp 451-550.
59. Singer, S. J.; Chandler, D. Free energy functions in the extended RISM approximation Mol. Phys. 1985, 55, 621-625
60. Lu, S. Y.; Jiang, Y. J.; Lv, J.; Zou, J. W.; Wu, T. X. Role of bridging water molecules in GSK3β-inhibitor complexes: Insights from QM/MM, MD, and molecular docking studies J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1907-1918
61. Österberg, F.; Morris, G. M.; Sanner, M. F.; Olson, A. J.; Goodsell, D. S. Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in A uto D ock Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2002, 46, 34-40
62. Olson, A. J.; Goodsell, D. S. Automated Docking and the Search for HIV Protease Inhibitors SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1998, 8, 273-285
63. Genheden, S.; Luchko, T.; Gusarov, S.; Kovalenko, A.; Ryde, U. An MM/3DRISM Approach for Ligand Binding Affinities J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 8505-8516
64. McQuarrie, D. A. Statistical Mechanics, 2 nd ed.; University Science Books: Sausalito, CA, 2000; Chapter XIII: Distribution Functions In Classical Monoatomic Liquids, p 266.
65. Young, T.; Abel, R.; Kim, B.; Berne, B. J.; Friesner, R. A. Motifs for molecular recognition exploiting hydrophobic enclosure in protein-ligand binding Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 808-813
66. Snyder, P. W.; Mecinović, J.; Moustakas, D. T.; Thomas, S. W.; Harder, M.; Mack, E. T.; Lockett, M. R.; Héroux, A.; Sherman, W.; Whitesides, G. M. Mechanism of the hydrophobic effect in the biomolecular recognition of arylsulfonamides by carbonic anhydrase Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108, 17889-17894
67. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Huey, R.; Olson, A. J. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of A uto D ock 2.4 J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 293-304
68. Hetenyi, C.; van der Spoel, D. Efficient docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 1729-1737
69. Michalewicz, Z.; Fogel, D. B. How to Solve It: Modern Heuristics, 2 nd ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2004; Chapter VII: Designing Evolutionary Algorithms, pp 161-184.
70. Hart, W. E.; Rosin, C.; Belew, R. K.; Morris, G. M. In Improved Evolutionary Hybrids for Flexible Ligand Docking in AutoDock; Floudas, C. A.; Pardalos, P. M., Eds.; Optimization in Computational Chemistry and Molecular Biology; Kluwer Academic Publishers B. V.: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000; pp 209-230.
71. James, T. L.; Liu, H.; Ulyanov, N. B.; Farr-Jones, S.; Zhang, H.; Donne, D. G.; Kaneko, K.; Groth, D.; Mehlhorn, I.; Prusiner, S. B.; Cohen, F. E. Solution structure of a 142-residue recombinant prion protein corresponding to the in fectious fragment of the scrapie isoform Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 10086-10091
72. Lima, L. M. T. R.; Cordeiro, Y.; Tinoco, L. W.; Marques, A. F.; Oliveira, C. L. P.; Sampath, S.; Kodali, R.; Choi, G.; Foguel, D.; Torriani, I.; Caughey, B.; Silva, J. L. Structural Insights into the Interaction between Prion Protein and Nucleic Acid Biochemistry 2006, 45, 9180-9187
73. Kuwata, K.; Nishida, N.; Matsumoto, T.; Kamatari, Y. O.; Hosokawa-Muto, J.; Kodama, K.; Nakamura, H. K.; Kimura, K.; Kawasaki, M.; Takakura, Y.; Shirabe, S.; Takata, J.; Kataoka, Y.; Katamine, S. Hot spots in prion protein for pathogenic conversion Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 11921-11926
74. Louloudi, M.; Hadjiliadis, N. Structural aspects of thiamine, its Derivatives and their metal complexes in relation to the enzymatic action of thiamine enzymes Coord. Chem. Rev. 1994, 135-136, 429-468
75. Stewart, J. Application of the PM6 method to modeling proteins J. Mol. Model. 2009, 15, 765-805
76. Jordan, F. Semiempirical calculations on the electronic structure and preferred conformation of thiamine (vitamin B1) and thiamine pyrophosphate (cocarboxylase) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 3623-3630
77. Turano, A.; Pletcher, J.; Furey, W.; Sax, M. Charge Density Analysis Of Thiamine Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1982, 378, 91-106
78. Shin, W.; Oh, D. G.; Chae, C. H.; Yoon, T. S. Conformational analyses of thiamin-related compounds. A stereochemical model for thiamin catalysis J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12238-12250
79. DuPre, D. B.; Wong, J. L. Topological Analysis of the Electron Density in Model Azolium Systems for Thiamin Structure-Function: Sulfur Is the Electron Sink and Positively Polarized Carbanions Act as Nucleophiles J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 7606-7612
80. Friedmann, R.; Uslar, W. Biochemistry and Physiology of Thiamin Diphosphate Enzymes. In Proceedings of the International Meeting on the Function of Thiamin Diphosphate Enzymes; Bisswanger, H.; Ullrich, J., Eds.; Verlag Chemie: Weinheim, Germany, 1990; pp 27-33.
81. Kozik, A. Current Advances in Buckwheat Research. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Buckwheat; Matano, T.; Ujihara, A., Eds.; Shinshu University Press: Shinshu, Japan, 1995; Chapter Thiamin-Binding Protein from Buckwheat Seeds: Some Molecular Properties, Ligand-Protein Interaction, Bioanalytical Applications, pp 823-831.
82. Soriano, E. V.; Rajashankar, K. R.; Hanes, J. W.; Bale, S.; Begley, T. P.; Ealick, S. E. Structural Similarities between Thiamin-Binding Protein and Thiaminase-I Suggest a Common Ancestor Biochemistry 2008, 47, 1346-1357
83. Sippel, K. H.; Venkatakrishnan, B.; Boehlein, S. K.; Sankaran, B.; Quirit, J. G.; Govindasamy, L.; Agbandje-McKenna, M.; Goodison, S.; Rosser, C. J.; McKenna, R. Insights into Mycoplasma genitalium metabolism revealed by the structure of MG289, an extracytoplasmic thiamine binding lipoprotein Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2011, 79, 528-536
84. Hanes, J. W.; Chatterjee, D.; Soriano, E. V.; Ealick, S. E.; Begley, T. P. Construction of a thiamin sensor from the periplasmic thiamin binding protein Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 2273-2275
85. Paramasivam, S.; Balakrishnan, A.; Dmitrenko, O.; Godert, A.; Begley, T. P.; Jordan, F.; Polenova, T. Solid-State NMR and Density Functional Theory Studies of Ionization States of Thiamin J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 730-736
86. Ciulli, A.; Blundell, T. L.; Abell, C. In Computational and Structural Approaches to Drug Discovery: Ligand-Protein Interactions; Stroud, R. M.; Finer-Moore, J., Eds.; RSC Biomolecular Sciences; Royal Society of Chemistry Publishing: London, 2008; Chapter XVI: Discovery and Extrapolation of Fragment Structures towards Drug Design, pp 293-319.
87. Case, D. A.; Darden, T. A.; Cheatham, T. E., III; Simmerling, C. L.; Wang, J.; Duke, R. E.; Luo, R.; Walker, R. C.; Zhang, W.; Merz, K. M.; Roberts, B.; Wang, B.; Hayik, S.; Roitberg, A.; Seabra, G.; Kolossváry, I.; Wong, K. F.; Paesani, F.; Vanicek, J.; Wu, X.; Brozell, S. R.; Steinbrecher, T.; Gohlke, H.; Cai, Q.; Ye, X.; Wang, J.; Hsieh, M. J.; Cui, G.; Roe, D. R.; Mathews, D. H.; Seetin, M. G.; Sagui, C.; Babin, V.; Luchko, T.; Gusarov, S.; Kovalenko, A.; Kollman, P. A. Amber 11; University of California: San Francisco, CA, 2010.
88. Duan, Y.; Wu, C.; Chowdhury, S.; Lee, M. C.; Xiong, G.; Zhang, W.; Yang, R.; Cieplak, P.; Luo, R.; Lee, T.; Caldwell, J.; Wang, J.; Kollman, P. A point charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 1999-2012
89. Lee, M. C.; Duan, Y. Distinguish protein decoys by Using a scoring function based on a new Amber force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2004, 55, 620-634
90. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Grigera, J. R.; Straatsma, T. P. The missing Term in effective pair potentials J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6269-6271
91. Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids; Oxford Science Publications; Clarendon Press: New York, 1989.
92. Baker, N. A.; Sept, D.; Joseph, S.; Holst, M. J.; McCammon, J. A. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 10037-10041
93. Wittorf, J. H.; Gubler, C. J. Coenzyme Binding in Yeast Pyruvate Decarboxylase Eur. J. Biochem. 1970, 14, 53-60
94. Gutowski, J. A.; Lienhard, G. E. Transition state analogs for thiamin pyrophosphate-dependent enzymes J. Biol. Chem. 1976, 251, 2863-2866
95. O'Brien, T. A.; Gennis, R. B. Studies of the thiamin pyrophosphate binding site of Escherichia coli pyruvate oxidase. Evidence for an essential tryptophan residue J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255, 3302-3307
96. Ullrich, J. Structure-Function Relationships In Pyruvate Decarboxylase Of Yeast And Wheat Germ Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1982, 378, 287-305
97. Hawkins, C. F.; Borges, A.; Perham, R. N. A common structural motif in thiamin pyrophosphate-binding enzymes FEBS Lett. 1989, 255, 77-82
98. Guo, F.; Zhang, D.; Kahyaoglu, A.; Farid, R. S.; Jordan, F. Is a Hydrophobic Amino Acid Required To Maintain the Reactive V Conformation of Thiamin at the Active Center of Thiamin Diphosphate-Requiring Enzymes? Experimental and Computational Studies of Isoleucine 415 of Yeast Pyruvate Decarboxylase Biochemistry 1998, 37, 13379-13391
99. Thomas, A. A.; De Meese, J.; Le Huerou, Y.; Boyd, S. A.; Romoff, T. T.; Gonzales, S. S.; Gunawardana, I.; Kaplan, T.; Sullivan, F.; Condroski, K.; Lyssikatos, J. P.; Aicher, T. D.; Ballard, J.; Bernat, B.; DeWolf, W.; Han, M.; Lemieux, C.; Smith, D.; Weiler, S.; Wright, S. K.; Vigers, G.; Brandhuber, B. Non-charged thiamine analogs as inhibitors of enzyme transketolase Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 509-512
100. Kluger, R. Thiamin diphosphate: a mechanistic update on enzymic and nonenzymic catalysis of decarboxylation Chem. Rev. 1987, 87, 863-876
101. Stewart, J. J. P. Optimization of Parameters for Semiempirical Methods V: Modification of NDDO Approximations and Application to 70 Elements J. Mol. Model. 2007, 13, 1173-1213
102. Bikadi, Z.; Hazai, E. Application of the PM6 semi-empirical method to modeling proteins enhances docking accuracy of A uto D ock J. Cheminf. 2009, 1, 15
103. Imai, T.; Hiraoka, R.; Kovalenko, A.; Hirata, F. Locating missing water molecules in protein cavities by the three-dimensional reference interaction site model theory of molecular solvation Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2007, 66, 804-813
104. Hirano, K.; Yokogawa, D.; Sato, H.; Sakaki, S. An Analysis of 3D Solvation Structure in Biomolecules: Application to Coiled Coil Serine and Bacteriorhodopsin J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 7935-7941
105. Hills, R. D., Jr.; Brooks, C. L., III. Hydrophobic Cooperativity as a Mechanism for Amyloid Nucleation J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 368, 894-901
106. Sanner, M. F. Python: a programming language for software integration and development J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 1999, 17, 57-61
107. Mobley, D. L.; Dumont, E.; Chodera, J. D.; Dill, K. A. Comparison of Charge Models for Fixed-Charge Force Fields: Small-Molecule Hydration Free Energies in Explicit Solvent J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 2242-2254
108. Mobley, D. L.; Graves, A. P.; Chodera, J. D.; McReynolds, A. C.; Shoichet, B. K.; Dill, K. A. Predicting Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energies to a Simple Model Site J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 371, 1118-1134
109. Parkin, G. Valence, Oxidation Number, and Formal Charge: Three Related but Fundamentally Different Concepts J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83, 791-799
110. Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. AM1: a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902-3909
111. Stewart, J. J. P. MOPAC: A General Molecular Orbital Package (Version 6.0) Quant. Chem. Program Exchange 1990, 455, 1-1
112. Jakalian, A.; Jack, D. B.; Bayly, C. I. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 1623-1641
113. Tsai, K.-C.; Wang, S.-H.; Hsiao, N.-W.; Li, M.; Wang, B. The effect of different electrostatic potentials on docking accuracy: A case study using DOCK5.4 Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 3509-3512
114. Jakalian, A.; Bush, B. L.; Jack, D. B.; Bayly, C. I. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: I. Method J. Comput. Chem. 2000, 21, 132-146
115. Wang, J.; Wolf, R. M.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1157-1174
116. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity-a rapid access to atomic charges Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 3219-3228
117. Weiner, S. J.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A.; Singh, U. C.; Ghio, C.; Alagona, G.; Profeta, S.; Weiner, P. A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 765-784
118. Dewar, M. J. S.; Thiel, W. Ground states of molecules. 38. The MNDO method. Approximations and parameters J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4899-4907
119. Stewart, J. J. P. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods. III Extension of PM3 to Be, Mg, Zn, Ga, Ge, As, Se, Cd, In, Sn, Sb, Te, Hg, Tl, Pb, and Bi J. Comput. Chem. 1991, 12, 320-341
120. Stewart, J. J. P. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods IV: extension of MNDO, AM1, and PM3 to more main group elements J. Mol. Model. 2004, 10, 155-164
121. Rocha, G. B.; Freire, R. O.; Simas, A. M.; Stewart, J. J. P. RM1: A reparameterization of AM1 for H, C, N, O, P, S, F, Cl, Br, and I J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1101-1111
122. Ferrara, P.; Gohlke, H.; Price, D. J.; Klebe, G.; Brooks, C. L. Assessing Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Interactions J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3032-3047
123. Gordon, J. C.; Myers, J. B.; Folta, T.; Shoja, V.; Heath, L. S.; Onufriev, A. H++: a server for estimating pKas and adding missing hydrogens to macromolecules Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W368-W371
124. Myers, J.; Grothaus, G.; Narayanan, S.; Onufriev, A. A simple clustering algorithm can be accurate enough for use in calculations of pKs in macromolecules Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2006, 63, 928-938
125. Bashford, D.; Karplus, M. pKa's of ionizable groups in proteins: atomic detail from a continuum electrostatic model Biochemistry 1990, 29, 10219-10225
126. Word, J. M.; Lovell, S. C.; Richardson, J. S.; Richardson, D. C. Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 285, 1735-1747
127. Sigalov, G.; Fenley, A.; Onufriev, A. Analytical electrostatics for biomolecules: Beyond the generalized-Born approximation J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 124902
128. a modeling J. Mol. Model. 2011, 1-10
129. Gilson, M. K. Multiple-site titration and molecular modeling: Two rapid methods for computing energies and forces for ionizable groups in proteins Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 1993, 15, 266-282
130. Onufriev, A. In Modeling Solvent Environments: Applications to Simulations of Biomolecules; Feig, M., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2010; Chapter VI: Continuum Electrostatics Solvent Modeling with the Generalized Born Model, pp 127-166.
131. Feig, M.; Onufriev, A.; Lee, M. S.; Im, W.; Case, D. A.; Brooks, C. L., III. Performance comparison of generalized born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 265-284
132. Olsson, M. H. M.; Søndergaard, C. R.; Rostkowski, M.; Jensen, J. H. PROPKA3: Consistent Treatment of Internal and Surface Residues in Empirical pKa Predictions J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 525-537
133. Søndergaard, C. R.; Olsson, M. H. M.; Rostkowski, M.; Jensen, J. H. Improved Treatment of Ligands and Coupling Effects in Empirical Calculation and Rationalization of pKa Values J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 2284-2295
134. Sproviero, E.; Newcomer, M.; Gascón, J. A.; Batista, E.; Brudvig, G.; Batista, V. The MoD-QM/MM methodology for structural refinement of photosystem II and other biological macromolecules Photosynth. Res. 2009, 102, 455-470
135. Zuegg, J.; Bliznyuk, A. A.; Gready, J. E. Comparison of electrostatic potential around proteins calculated from Amber and AM1 charges: application to mutants of prion protein Mol. Phys. 2003, 101, 2437-2450
136. Ponder, J. W.; Case, D. A. In Protein Simulations; Daggett, V., Ed.; Advances in Protein Chemistry; Academic Press: San Diego, 2003; Vol. 66; Chapter II: Force Fields for Protein Simulations, pp 27-85.
137. Wang, Z. X.; Zhang, W.; Wu, C.; Lei, H.; Cieplak, P.; Duan, Y. Strike a balance: Optimization of backbone torsion parameters of Amber polarizable force field for simulations of proteins and peptides J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 781-790
138. Fuhrmann, J.; Rurainski, A.; Lenhof, H. P.; Neumann, D. A new Lamarckian genetic algorithm for flexible ligand-receptor docking J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 1911-1918