PHF20 is an effector protein of p53 double lysine methylation that stabilizes and activates p53

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 916-924

  Cui, Gaofeng ^a   Park, Sungman ^b   Badeaux, Aimee I ^c   Kim, Donghwa ^b   Lee, Joseph ^a   Thompson, James R ^a   Yan, Fei ^b   Kaneko, Satoshi ^b,d   Yuan, Zengqiang ^b,e   Botuyan, Maria Victoria ^a   Bedford, Mark T ^c   Cheng, Jin Q ^b   Mer, Georges ^a  

^a MAYO GRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

^b H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^d BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACYLTRANSFERASE; HOMODIMER; LYSINE; PHF20 PROTEIN; PROTEIN MDM2; PROTEIN P53; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; EMBRYO; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN METHYLATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; UBIQUITINATION; UPREGULATION;

ANTIGENS, NEOPLASM; CELL LINE; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DNA DAMAGE; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; LYSINE; METHYLATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN P53; UBIQUITINATION; UP-REGULATION;

EID: 84866091585     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2353     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Vousden, K.H. & Prives, C. Blinded by the light: the growing complexity of p53. Cell 137, 413-431 (2009).
2. Beckerman, R. & Prives, C. Transcriptional regulation by p53. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a000935 (2010).
3. Huang, J. et al. Repression of p53 activity by Smyd2-mediated methylation. Nature 444, 629-632 (2006).
4. Huang, J. et al. p53 is regulated by the lysine demethylase LSD1. Nature 449, 105-108 (2007).
5. Shi, X. et al. Modulation of p53 function by SET8-mediated methylation at lysine 382. Mol. Cell 27, 636-646 (2007).
6. Kachirskaia, I. et al. Role for 53BP1 Tudor domain recognition of p53 dimethylated at lysine 382 in DNA damage signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 34660-34666 (2008).
7. Roy, S. et al. Structural insight into p53 recognition by the 53BP1 tandem Tudor domain. J. Mol. Biol. 398, 489-496 (2010).
8. West, L.E. & Gozani, O. Regulation of p53 function by lysine methylation. Epigenomics 3, 361-369 (2011).
9. Joo, W.S. et al. Structure of the 53BP1 BRCT region bound to p53 and its comparison to the Brca1 BRCT structure. Genes Dev. 16, 583-593 (2002).
10. Derbyshire, D.J. et al. Crystal structure of human 53BP1 BRCT domains bound to p53 tumour suppressor. EMBO J. 21, 3863-3872 (2002).
11. 13C-methylation. Biochemistry 48, 3798-3800 (2009).
12. Kim, J. et al. Tudor, MBT and chromo domains gauge the degree of lysine methylation. EMBO Rep. 7, 397-403 (2006).
13. Botuyan, M.V. et al. Structural basis for the methylation state-specifc recognition of histone H4-K20 by 53BP1 and Crb2 in DNA repair. Cell 127, 1361-1373 (2006).
14. Fischer, U. et al. Glioma-expressed antigen 2 (GLEA2): a novel protein that can elicit immune responses in glioblastoma patients and some controls. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 126, 206-213 (2001).
15. Pallasch, C.P. et al. Autoantibodies against GLEA2 and PHF3 in glioblastoma: Tumor-associated autoantibodies correlated with prolonged survival. Int. J. Cancer 117, 456-459 (2005).
16. Heisel, S.M. et al. Increased seroreactivity to glioma-expressed antigen 2 in brain tumor patients under radiation. PLoS ONE 3, e2164 (2008).
17. Park, S. et al. Identifcation of an Akt interaction protein, PHF20/TZP, that transcriptionally regulates p53. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 11151-11163 (2012).
18. Dou, Y. et al. Physical association and coordinate function of the H3 K4 methyltransferase MLL1 and the H4 K16 acetyltransferase MOF. Cell 121, 873-885 (2005).
19. Taipale, M. et al. hMOF histone acetyltransferase is required for histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 6798-6810 (2005).
20. Mendjan, S. et al. Nuclear pore components are involved in the transcriptional regulation of dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 21, 811-823 (2006).
21. Li, X., Wu, L., Corsa, C.A., Kunkel, S. & Dou, Y. Two mammalian MOF complexes regulate transcription activation by distinct mechanisms. Mol. Cell 36, 290-301 (2009).
22. Cai, Y. et al. Subunit composition and substrate specifcity of a MOF-containing histone acetyltransferase distinct from the male-specifc lethal (MSL) complex. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 4268-4272 (2010).
23. Sykes, S.M. et al. Acetylation of the p53 DNA-binding domain regulates apoptosis induction. Mol. Cell 24, 841-851 (2006).
24. Yang, W.H. et al. Modifcation of p53 with O-linked N-acetylglucosamine regulates p53 activity and stability. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 1074-1083 (2006).
25. Badeaux, A.I. et al. Loss of the methyl lysine effector protein PHF20 impacts the expression of genes regulated by the lysine acetyltransferase MOF. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 429-437 (2012).
26. Huang, Y., Fang, J., Bedford, M.T., Zhang, Y. & Xu, R.M. Recognition of histone H3 lysine-4 methylation by the double tudor domain of JMJD2A. Science 312, 748-751 (2006).
27. Lee, J., Thompson, J.R., Botuyan, M.V. & Mer, G. Distinct binding modes specify the recognition of methylated histones H3K4 and H4K20 by JMJD2A-tudor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 109-111 (2008).
28. Brown, M.A., Sims, R.J. III, Gottlieb, P.D. & Tucker, P.W. Identifcation and characterization of Smyd2: a split SET/MYND domain-containing histone H3 lysine 36-specifc methyltransferase that interacts with the Sin3 histone deacetylase complex. Mol. Cancer 5, 26 (2006).
29. Xiao, B. et al. Specifcity and mechanism of the histone methyltransferase Pr-Set7. Genes Dev. 19, 1444-1454 (2005).
30. Couture, J.F., Collazo, E., Brunzelle, J.S. & Trievel, R.C. Structural and functional analysis of SET8, a histone H4 Lys-20 methyltransferase. Genes Dev. 19, 1455-1465 (2005).
31. Selenko, P. et al. In situ observation of protein phosphorylation by high-resolution NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 321-329 (2008).
32. Ito, Y. & Selenko, P. Cellular structural biology. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 20, 640-648 (2010).
33. Liokatis, S., Dose, A., Schwarzer, D. & Selenko, P. Simultaneous detection of protein phosphorylation and acetylation by high-resolution NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 14704-14705 (2010).
34. Xu, C., Cui, G., Botuyan, M.V. & Mer, G. Structural basis for the recognition of methylated histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 subunit of histone deacetylase complex Rpd3S. Structure 16, 1740-1750 (2008).
35. Brooks, C.L. & Gu, W. p53 ubiquitination: Mdm2 and beyond. Mol. Cell 21, 307-315 (2006).
36. Meek, D.W. & Anderson, C.W. Posttranslational modifcation of p53: cooperative integrators of function. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1, a000950 (2009).
37. Poyurovsky, M.V. et al. The C terminus of p53 binds the N-terminal domain of MDM2. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 982-989 (2010).
38. Adams-Cioaba, M.A. et al. Structural studies of the tandem Tudor domains of fragile X mental retardation related proteins FXR1 and FXR2. PLoS ONE 5, e13559 (2010).
39. Tripsianes, K. et al. Structural basis for dimethylarginine recognition by the Tudor domains of human SMN and SPF30 proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1414-1420 (2011).
40. Li, B. et al. Combined action of PHD and chromo domains directs the Rpd3S HDAC to transcribed chromatin. Science 316, 1050-1054 (2007).
41. Ruthenburg, A.J., Li, H., Patel, D.J. & Allis, C.D. Multivalent engagement of chromatin modifcations by linked binding modules. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 983-994 (2007).
42. Wang, Z. & Patel, D.J. Combinatorial readout of dual histone modifcations by paired chromatin-associated modules. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 18363-18368 (2011).
43. Horton, J.R. et al. Enzymatic and structural insights for substrate specifcity of a family of jumonji histone lysine demethylases. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 38-43 (2010).
44. Benezra, R. An intermolecular disulfde bond stabilizes E2A homodimers and is required for DNA binding at physiological temperatures. Cell 79, 1057-1067 (1994).
45. Mayo, L.D. & Donner, D.B. A phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway promotes translocation of Mdm2 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11598-11603 (2001).
46. Botuyan, M.V. et al. Structural basis of BACH1 phosphopeptide recognition by BRCA1 tandem BRCT domains. Structure 12, 1137-1146 (2004).
47. Simon, M.D. et al. The site-specifc installation of methyl-lysine analogs into recombinant histones. Cell 128, 1003-1012 (2007).
48. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 (1997).
49. Kelley, L.A. & Sternberg, M.J. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat. Protoc. 4, 363-371 (2009).
50. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
51. Adams, P.D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213-221 (2010).
52. Delaglio, F. et al. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277-293 (1995).
53. Johnson, B.A. & Blevins, R.A. NMRView: a computer program for visualization and analysis of NMR data. J. Biomol. NMR 4, 603-614 (1994).
54. Duggan, B.M., Legge, G.B., Dyson, H.J. & Wright, P.E. SANE (Structure Assisted NOE Evaluation): an automated model-based approach for NOE assignment. J. Biomol. NMR 19, 321-329 (2001).
55. Cornilescu, G., Delaglio, F. & Bax, A. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J. Biomol. NMR 13, 289-302 (1999).
56. 13C chemical-shift data. J. Biomol. NMR 4, 171-180 (1994).
57. Güntert, P. Automated NMR structure calculation with CYANA. Methods Mol. Biol. 278, 353-378 (2004).
58. Case, D.A. et al. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1668-1688 (2005).
59. Laskowski, R.A., Rullmannn, J.A., MacArthur, M.W., Kaptein, R. & Thornton, J.M. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 8, 477-486 (1996).
60. Koradi, R., Billeter, M. & Wüthrich, K. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 51-55 (1996).