Ranking parameters on quality of online shopping websites using multi-criteria method

Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology

Volumn 4, Issue 21, 2012, Pages 4380-4396

  Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh ^a   Bagherifard, Karamollah ^b   Ibrahim, Othman ^a   Janahmadi, Nasim ^c   Ebrahimi, Leila ^d  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c Ahrar Institute of Technology and Higher Education   (Iran)

^d PAYAME NOOR UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Fuzzy TOPSIS; Information quality; International students; Online shopping; Quality; Service quality; System

Indexed keywords

FUZZY-TOPSIS; INFORMATION QUALITY; ONLINE SHOPPING; SERVICE QUALITY; SYSTEM;

IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF SERVICE; STUDENTS;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 84866007718     PISSN: 20407459     EISSN: 20407467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adamo, J. M., 1980. Fuzzy decision trees, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 4, pp: 207-219.
2. Bailey, J. E. and S.W. Pearson, 1983. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Manage. Sci., 29(5): 530-545.
3. Buckley, J.J., 1985, Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Set. Syst., 17(3): 233-247.
4. Chiu, C.M., M.H. Hsu, S.Y. Sun, T.C. Lin and P.C. Sun, 2005. Usability, quality, value and e-learning continuance decisions. Comp. Educ., 45(4): 399-416.
5. Cho, V., T.C.E. Cheng and W.M.J. Lai, 2009. The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Comp. Educ., 53(2): 216-227.
6. Chatterjee, D. and V. Sambamurthy, 1999. Business implications of web technology: An insight into the usage of the world wide web by U.S. companies. Electr. Mark., 9(1): 126-131.
7. Elliot, S. and S. Fowell, 2000. Expectations versus reality:a snapshot of consumer experiences with internet retailing. Int. J. Inform. Manage. 20: 323-15336.
8. Gwo-Hshiung, T. and L. Jen-Jia, 1997. Application of TOPSIS multiobjective programming approach to fire station location in tanhai new town. J. City Plann., 24(1): 81-98, (in Chinese).
9. Gefen, D., 2002. Customer Loyalty in E-Commerce. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (3): 27-51.
10. Hakman, A.W., 2000. Opportunities to enhance a commercial website. Inform. Manage., 38: 15-21.
11. Hwang, C.L. and K. Yoon, 1981. Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
12. Janda, S., P.J. Trocchia and K.P. Gwinner, 2002. Consumer perceptions of Internet retail service quality. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manage., (13:5): 412-431.
13. Javenpaa, S.L. and P.A. Todd, 1997. Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. Int. J. Electr. Commer. (1:2): 59-88.
14. Katerattanakul, P., 2002. Framework of effective web site design for business-to-consumer internet commerce. INFOR (40:1): 57-69.
15. Kaynama, S.A. and C.I. Black, 2000. A proposal to assess the service quality of online travel agencies: An exploratory study. J. Prof. Serv. Mark., 21(1): 63-88.
16. Kim, S.Y. and Y.J. Lim, 2001. Consumers' Perceived Importance of and Satisfaction with Internet Shopping. Electr. Mark. (11:3): 148-154.
17. Lee, M.K.O., M.K. Christy and Z. Chen, 2005. Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Inform. Manage., 42(8): 1095-1104.
18. Lin, H.F., 2007. Measuring online learning systems success: Applying the updated DeLone and McLean's model. Cyber Psychol. Behav., 10(6): 817-820.
19. Louis, C. and M.L. Leon., 1999. Computime: Evolving with E-commerce. New Straits Times, Weekly, pp: 26.
20. Loiacono, E.T., R.T. Watson and D.L. Goodhue, 2002. WEBQUAL: A measure of Web site quality. Market. Educ. Conf. Market. Theor. Appl., 13: 432-7.
21. Madu, C.N. and A.A. Madu, 2002b. Dimensions of E-quality. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage., (19:3): 246-258.
22. Marks, R.B., S.D. Sibley and J.B. Arbaugh, 2005. A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. J. Manage. Educ., 29(4): 531-563.
23. Madu, C.N. and A.A. Madu, 2002a. Dimensions of e-quality. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage., 19(3): 246-58.
24. MOHE, 2010. Perangkaan Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia.
25. Ong, C.S., J.Y. Lai and Y.S. Wang, 2004. Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Inform. Manage., 41(6): 795-804.
26. Opricovic, S. and T., Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 156(2): 445-455.
27. Pituch, K.A. and Y.K. Lee, 2006. The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Comp. Educ., 47(2): 222-244.
28. Roca, J.C., C.M. Chiu and F.J. Martinez, 2006. Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hum. Comp. Stud., 64(8): 683-696.
29. Saade, R. and B. Bahli, 2005. The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Inform. Manage., 42(2): 317-327.
30. Szymanski, D.M. and R.T. Hise, 2000. E-satisfaction: An initial examination. J. Retailing, 76(3): 309-322.
31. Teo, H.H., H.C. Chan, K.K. Wei and Z. Zhang, 2003. Evaluating information accessibility and community adaptivity features for sustaining virtual learning communities. Int. J. Hum. Comp. Stud., 59(5): 671-697.
32. Tung, F.C. and S.C. Chang, 2008. Nursing students' behavioral intention to use online courses: A questionnaire survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud., 45(9): b1299-1309.
33. Tzeng, G.H., C.H. Chiang and C.W. Li, 2007. Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst. Appl., 32(4): 1028-1044.
34. Wang, Y.S., 2003a. Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Inform. Manage., 41(1): 75-86.
35. Turban, E. and D. Gehrke, 2000. Determinants of e-commerce web site. Hum. Syst. Manage., 19(2): 111-120.
36. Zeithmal, V.A., A. Parasuraman and A. Malhotra, 2002. An empirical examination of the service quality -value-loyalty chain in an electronic channel. Working paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.