Genetic Architecture of Sexual Selection: QTL Mapping of Male Song and Female Receiver Traits in an Acoustic Moth

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Limousin, Denis ^a,d,e   Streiff, Réjane ^b   Courtois, Brigitte ^c   Dupuy, Virginie ^b   Alem, Sylvain ^a   Greenfield, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

^c UMR AGAP   (France)

^d INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^e SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC TRAIT; HERITABILITY; INBRED STRAIN; LOUDNESS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MOTH; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SELECTION; ULTRASOUND;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; DNA PRIMERS; ECOLOGY; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; KARYOTYPING; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; MOTHS; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SEX FACTORS; SEX PRESELECTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SINGING; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

ACHROIA GRISELLA; ANIMALIA; LEPIDOPTERA;

EID: 84866006466     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044554     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Andersson M, Simmons LW, (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 296-302.
2. Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection. 2nd edition. New York: Dover publications. 291 p.
3. Kirkpatrick M, (1996) Good genes and direct selection in the evolution of mating preferences. Evolution 50: 2125-2140.
4. Kirkpatrick M, Hall DW, (2004) Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution 58: 683-691.
5. Pomiankowski A, (1988) The evolution of female mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 5: 136-184.
6. Bakker TCM, Pomiankowski A, (1995) The genetic basis of female mate preferences. J Evol Biol 8: 129-171.
7. Lande R, (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 3721-3725.
8. Kirkpatrick M, (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36: 1-12.
9. Welch AM, (2003) Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent. Evolution 57: 883-893.
10. Greenfield MD, Rodriguez RL, (2004) Genotype-environment interaction and the reliability of mating signals. Anim Behav 68: 1461-1468.
11. Ritchie MG (2007) Sexual selection and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38, 79-102.
12. Shaw KL, Ellison CK, Oh KP, Wiley C, (2011) Pleiotropy, "sexy" traits, and speciation. Behav Ecol 22: 1154-1155.
13. Wiley C, Ellison CK, Shaw KL, (2012) Widespread genetic linkage of mating signals and preferences in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 279: 1203-1209.
14. Bousquet F, Nojima T, Houot B, Chauvel I, Chaudy S, et al. (2012) Expression of a desaturase gene, desat1, in neural and nonneural tissues separately affects perception and emission of sex pheromones in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 249-254.
15. Singh ND, Shaw KL, (2012) On the scent of pleiotropy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 5-6.
16. Alexander RD, (1962) Evolutionary change in cricket acoustical communication. Evolution 16: 443-467.
17. Gerhardt HC, (1994) The evolution of vocalization in frogs and toads. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25: 293-324.
18. Ritchie MG, Townhill RM, Hoikkala A, (1998) Female preference for fly song: playback experiments confirm the targets of sexual selection. Anim Behav 56: 713-717.
19. Boake CRB, (2005) Sexual selection and speciation in Hawaiian Drosophila. Behav Genet 35: 297-303.
20. Gerhardt HC, (1991) Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim Behav 42: 615-635.
21. Ritchie MG, (1996) The shape of female mating preferences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 14628-14631.
22. Wagner WE Jr, Murray A-M, Cade WH, (1995) Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female field crickets, Gryllus integer. Anim Behav 49: 1269-1281.
23. Wagner WE Jr, (1998) Measuring female mating preferences. Anim Behav 55: 1029-1042.
24. Uetz GW, Roberts JA, Taylor PW, (2009) Multimodal communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: female response to multimodal versus unimodal signals. Anim Behav 78: 299-305.
25. Rundus AS, Sullivan-Beckers L, Wilgers DJ, Hebets EA, (2011) Females are choosier in the dark: environment-dependent reliance on courtship components and its impact on fitness. Evolution 65: 268-282.
26. Spangler HG, Greenfield MD, Takessian A, (1984) Ultrasonic mate calling in the lesser waxmoth. Physiol Entomol 9: 87-95.
27. Jang Y, Greenfield MD, (1996) Ultrasonic communication and sexual selection in waxmoths: female choice based on energy and asynchrony of male signals. Anim Behav 51: 1095-1106.
28. Jang Y, Greenfield MD, (1998) Absolute versus relative measurements of sexual selection: assessing the contributions of ultrasonic signal characters to mate attraction in lesser wax moths, Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Evolution 52: 1383-1393.
29. Collins RD, Jang Y, Reinhold K, Greenfield MD, (1999) Quantitative genetics of ultrasonic advertisement signaling in the lesser waxmoth Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Heredity 83: 644-651.
30. Brandt LSE, Greenfield MD, (2004) Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song. J Evol Biol 17: 821-828.
31. Jang Y, Greenfield MD, (2000) Quantitative genetics of female choice in an ultrasonic pyralid moth, Achroia grisella: variation and evolvability of preference along multiple dimensions of the male advertisement signal. Heredity 84: 73-80.
32. Rodriguez RL, Greenfield MD, (2003) Genetic variance and phenotypic plasticity in a component of female choice in an ultrasonic moth. Evolution 57: 1304-1313.
33. Kunike G, (1930) Zur biologie der kleinen Wachsmotte, Achroea grisella (Fabricius). Z Angew Entomol 16: 304-356.
34. Greenfield MD, Coffelt JA, (1983) Reproductive behaviour of the lesser waxmoth, Achroia grisella (Pyralidae: Galleriinae): signalling, pair formation, male interactions, and mate guarding. Behaviour 84: 287-315.
35. Limousin D, Greenfield MD, (2009) Evaluation of amplitude in male song: female waxmoths respond to fortissimo notes. J Exp Biol 212: 4091-4100.
36. Reinhold K, Greenfield MD, Jang Y, Broce A, (1998) Energetic cost of sexual attractiveness: ultrasonic advertisement in waxmoths. Anim Behav 55: 905-913.
37. Jang Y, Collins RD, Greenfield MD, (1997) Variation and repeatability of ultrasonic sexual advertisement signals in Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Insect Behav 10: 87-98.
38. Dutky SR, Thompson JV, Cantwell GE, (1962) A technique for mass rearing the greater wax moth. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 64: 56-58.
39. Heckel DG, Gahan LJ, Liu Y-B, Tabashnik BE, (1999) Genetic mapping of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in diamondback moth using biphasic linkage analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 8373-8377.
40. Jia F-Y, Greenfield MD, Collins RD, (2001) Ultrasonic signal competition among male wax moths. J Insect Behav 14: 19-33.
41. Greig EI, Greenfield MD, (2004) Sexual selection and predator avoidance in an acoustic moth: discriminating females take fewer risks. Behaviour 141: 799-815.
42. Midamegbe A, Vitalis R, Malausa T, Delava E, Cros-Arteil S, et al. (2011) Scanning the European corn borer (Ostrinia spp.) genome for adaptive divergence between host-affiliated sibling species. Mol Ecol 20: 1414-1430.
43. Van Ooijen JW (2006) JoinMap ® 4, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Wageningen, Netherlands: Kyazma B.V.
44. Kosambi DD, (1944) The estimation of map distance from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12: 172-175.
45. Van Ooijen JW (2004) MapQTL®5, Software for the mapping of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations. Wageningen, Netherlands: Kyazma B.V.
46. Van Ooijen JW, (1992) Accuracy of mapping quantitative trait loci in autogamous species. Theoret Appl Genet 84: 803-811.
47. Churchill GA, Doerge RW, (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138: 963-971.
48. Velthuis B-J, Yang W, Van Opijnen T, Werren JH, (2005) Genetics of female mate discrimination of heterospecific males in Nasonia (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae). Anim Behav 69: 1107-1120.
49. Oxley PR, Spivak M, Oldroyd BP, (2010) Six quantitative trait loci influence task thresholds for hygienic behaviour in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Mol Ecol 19: 1452-1461.
50. Sasabe M, Takami Y, Sota T, (2010) QTL for the species-specific male and female genital morphologies in Ohomopterus ground beetles. Mol Ecol 19: 5231-5239.
51. Jia F-Y, Greenfield MD, (1997) When are good genes good? Variable outcomes of female choice in wax moths. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 264: 1057-1063.
52. Beavis WD (1998) QTL analyses: power, precision, and accuracy. In: Paterson AH, editor. Molecular Dissection of Complex Traits. New York: CRC Press. pp. 145-162.
53. Xu SZ, (2003) Theoretical basis of the Beavis effect. Genetics 165: 2259-2268.
54. Gleason JM, Nuzhdin SV, Ritchie MG, (2002) Quantitative trait loci affecting a courtship signal in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 89: 1-6.
55. Shaw KL, Parsons YM, Lesnick SC, (2007) QTL analysis of a rapidly evolving speciation phenotype in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. Mol Ecol 16: 2879-2892.
56. Muranty H, (1996) Power of tests for quantitative trait loci detection using full-sib families in different schemes. Heredity 76: 156-165.
57. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th edition. Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley Longman. 464 p.
58. Chenoweth SF, Blows MW, (2006) Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice. Nature Rev Genet 7: 681-692.
59. Simmons LW, (2004) Genotypic variation in calling song and female preferences of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Anim Behav 68: 313-322.
60. Bakker TCM, (1993) Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature 363: 255-257.
61. Wilkinson GS, Reillo PR, (1994) Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 255: 1-6.
62. Simmons LW, Kotiaho JS, (2007) Quantitative genetic correlation between trait and preference supports a sexually selected sperm process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 16604-16608.
63. Löfstedt C, Hansson BS, Roelofs W, Bengtsson BO, (1989) No linkage between genes controlling female pheromone production and male pheromone response in the European cornborer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hubner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Genetics 123: 553-556.
64. Allison JD, Roff DA, Cardé RT, (2008) Genetic independence of female signal form and male receiver design in the almond moth, Cadra cautella. J Evol Biol 21: 1666-1672.
65. Morris MR, Wagner WE Jr, Ryan MJ, (1996) A negative correlation between trait and mate preference in Xiphophorus pygmaeus. Anim Behav 52: 1193-1203.
66. Zhou Y, Kelly JK, Greenfield MD, (2011) Testing the fisherian mechanism: examining the genetic correlation between male song and female response in waxmoths. Evol Ecol 25: 307-329.
67. Ritchie MG, Saarikettu M, Hoikkala A, (2005) Variation, but no covariance, in female preference functions and male song in a natural population of Drosophila montana. Anim Behav 70: 849-854.
68. Qvarnström A, Brommer JE, Gustafsson L, (2006) Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. Nature 441: 84-86.
69. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 624 p.
70. Andersson M, Iwasa Y, (1996) Sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 11: A53-A58.
71. Charmantier A, Sheldon BC, (2006) Testing genetic models of mate choice evolution in the wild. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 417-419.