Variation, but no covariance, in female preference functions and male song in a natural population of Drosophila montana

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 849-854

  Ritchie, Michael G ^a   Saarikettu, Mari ^b   Hoikkala, Anneli ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE BEHAVIOR; MATING SUCCESS; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONG;

DROSOPHILA MONTANA;

EID: 26244460137     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.018     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. M. Andersson Sexual Selection 1994 Princeton University Press Princeton, New Jersey
2. S.J. Arnold Sexual selection: the interface of theory and empiricism P. Bateson Mate Choice 1983 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 67 107
3. J. Aspi, and A. Hoikkala Male mating success and survival in the field with respect to size and courtship song characters in Drosophila littoralis and D. montana (Diptera: Drosophilidae) Journal of Insect Behavior 8 1995 67 87
4. T.C.M. Bakker Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks Nature 363 1993 255 257
5. T.C.M. Bakker, and A. Pomiankowski The genetic basis of female mate preferences Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8 1995 129 171
6. A.L. Basolo Phylogenetic evidence for the role of a pre-existing bias in sexual selection Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 259 1995 307 311
7. M.W. Blows Evolution of the genetic covariance between male and female components of mate recognition: an experimental test Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 266 1999 2169 2174
8. M.W. Blows, R. Brooks, and P.G. Kraft Exploring complex fitness surfaces: multiple ornamentation and polymorphism in male guppies Evolution 57 2003 1622 1630
9. C.R.B. Boake Coevolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals: genetic coupling and genetic coevolution Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6 1991 225 227
10. R. Brooks, and J.A. Endler Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection Evolution 55 2001 1644 1655
11. R.K. Butlin, and M.G. Ritchie Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 37 1989 237 246
12. T.H. Day, and A.S. Gilburn Sexual selection in seaweed flies Advances in the Study of Behaviour 26 1997 1 57
13. D.S. Falconer, and T.F.C. Mackay Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996 Longman Harton
14. S. Gavrilets Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual selection Nature 403 2000 886 889
15. S. Gavrilets, G. Arnqvist, and U. Friberg The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 268 2001 531 539
16. Genstat Committee Genstat 5 Release 3 Reference Manual 1993 Oxford University Press Oxford
17. A.S. Gilburn, and T.H. Day Evolution of female choice in seaweed flies: Fisherian and good genes mechanisms operate in different populations Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 255 1994 159 165
18. D.A. Gray, and W.H. Cade Quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the field cricket Gryllus integer Evolution 53 1999 848 854
19. M. Hall, A. Lindholm, and R. Brooks Direct selection on male attractiveness and female preference fails to produce a response BioMed Central Evolutionary Biology 4 2004 1 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/4/1
20. A. Hedrick, and T. Weber Variance in female responses to the fine structure of male song in the field cricket, Gryllus integer Behavioral Ecology 9 1998 582 591
21. A. Hoikkala, and E. Isoherranen Variation and repeatability of courtship song characters among wild-caught and laboratory-reared Drosophila montana and D. littoralis males (Diptera: Drosophilidae) Journal of Insect Behavior 10 1997 193 202
22. A. Hoikkala, J. Aspi, and L. Suvanto Male courtship song frequency as an indicator of male genetic quality in an insect species, Drosophila montana Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 265 1998 503 508
23. A.E. Houde Effect of artificial selection on male colour patterns on mating preference of female guppies Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 256 1994 125 130
24. M.D. Jennions, and M. Petrie Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences Biological Reviews 72 1997 283 327
25. F.-Y. Jia, and M.D. Greenfield When are good genes good? Variable outcomes of female choice in wax moths Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 264 1997 1057 1063
26. K.Y. Kaneshiro, and C.R.B. Boake Sexual selection and speciation: issues raised by Hawaiian Drosophila Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2 1987 207 212
27. J.S. Kotiaho, L.W. Simmons, and J.L. Tomkins Towards a resolution of the lek paradox Nature 410 2001 684 686
28. R. Lande Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 78 1981 3721 3725
29. R. Lande Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline Evolution 36 1982 213 223
30. J. Liimatainen, A. Hoikkala, J. Aspi, and P. Welbergen Courtship in Drosophila montana: the effects of male auditory signals on the behaviour of flies Animal Behaviour 43 1992 35 48
31. M.R. Morris, W.E. Wagner, and M.J. Ryan A negative correlation between trait and mate preference in Xiphophorus pygmaeus Animal Behaviour 52 1996 1193 1203
32. R.A. Nichols, and R.K. Butlin Does runaway sexual selection work in finite populations? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2 1989 299 313
33. A. Pomiankowski, and A.P. Møller A resolution of the lek paradox Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 260 1995 21 29
34. A. Pomiankowski, and L. Sheridan Linked sexiness and choosiness Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9 1994 242 244
35. K. Reinhold, K. Reinhold, and K.J. Jacoby Dissecting the repeatability of female choice in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus Animal Behaviour 64 2002 245 250
36. M.G. Ritchie The shape of female mating preferences Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 93 1996 14628 14631
37. M.G. Ritchie, R.M. Townhill, and A. Hoikkala Female preference for fly song: playbacks confirm correlational evidence of the targets of sexual selection Animal Behaviour 56 1998 713 717
38. M.G. Ritchie, M. Saarikettu, S. Livingstone, and A. Hoikkala Characterisation of female preference functions for a sexually selected acoustic signal in D. montana, and a test of the "temperature coupling" hypothesis Evolution 55 2001 721 727
39. L. Rowe, and D. Houle The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 263 1996 1415 1421
40. M.J. Ryan, and A.S. Rand Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication Evolution 47 1993 647 657
41. M.J. Ryan, and A.S. Rand Female responses to ancestral advertisement calls in Túngara frogs Science 269 1995 390 392
42. K. Shaw Phylogenetic tests of the sensory exploitation model of sexual selection Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10 1995 117 120
43. L. Suvanto, J.O. Liimatainen, T. Tregenza, and A. Hoikkala Courtship signals and mate choice of the flies of inbred Drosophila montana strains Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13 2000 583 592
44. M. Vuoristo, E. Isoherranen, and A. Hoikkala Female wing spreading as acceptance signal in the Drosophila virilis group of species Journal of Insect Behavior 9 1996 505 516
45. W.E.J. Wagner, A.M. Murray, and W.H. Cade Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female crickets, Gryllus integer Animal Behaviour 49 1995 1269 1281
46. G.S. Wilkinson, and P.R. Reillo Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 255 1994 1 6