Opponents and supporters of water policy change in the Netherlands and hungary

Water Alternatives

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 26-47

  Werners, Saskia E ^a   Warner, Jeroen ^a   Roth, Dik ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coalition; Hungary; Individuals; Netherlands; Transition; Water policy change

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; POLICY APPROACH; POLICY STRATEGY; STRATEGIC APPROACH; WATER PLANNING;

HUNGARY; NETHERLANDS;

EID: 77956636979     PISSN: 19650175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Andrásfalvy, B. 1973. Ancient floodplain and water management at Sarkoz and the surrounding area before the river regulations (in Hungarian). Vízügyi történeti füzetek 6.
2. Bálint, Z.; Haraszty, L.; Kalocs, B. and Seregélyes, T. 2000. Mivel gazdagítjuk az Európai Uniót / Hungary enriches the European Union (bilingual). Budapest, Hungary: WWF Hungary.
3. Balogh, P. 2002. Basics and method of floodplain management on middle-Tisza valley. Budapest: VATI Kht.
4. Barta, K.; Bódis, K.; Boga, T.L.; Kiss, T.; Kiss, R.; Mezosi, G.; Pálfai, I.; Rakonczai, J.; Szlávik, L. and Török, I.G. 2000. The hydrological risks influencing the development of the Tisza country; resources and opportunities (in Hungarian). Szeged, Hungary: University of Szeged, Natural Geography Department.
5. Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. 1993. Agendas and instabilities in American politics. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press.
6. Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (Eds). 2002. Policy dynamics. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press.
7. Bellon, T. 1991. Floodplain husbandry along the Tisza in the XVIII-XIX century (in Hungarian). In Great Plain Research Institute (Ed), Alföldi társadalom, Volume II, pp. 109-124. Békéscsaba, Hungary: Centre for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
8. Bellon, T. 2004. Living together with nature. Farming on the river flats in the valley of the Tisza. Acta Ethnographica Hungarica 49(3): 243-256.
9. Born, B. and Purcell, M. 2006. Avoiding the local trap: Scale and food systems in planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26(2): 195-207.
10. Botos, C.; Kajner, P.; Molnár, G. and Ungvári, G. 2002. Floodplain landscape management: Concept and concrete steps at the Bodrogköz area. The 'Last Straw' program's ecological historical foundation and the synthesis of the environmental economics analysis (in Hungarian). Budapest-Karcsa-Nyíregyháza: Bokartisz. www.bokartisz.hu
11. Caniëls, M.C.J. and Romijn, H.A. 2008. Actor networks in strategic niche management: Insights from social network theory. Futures 40(7): 613-629.
12. Cselószki, T. 2006. Civil sector thoughts on the further development of the Vásárhelyi Plan, specifically with respect to changes in land use. Nagyköru, Hungary: Alliance for the Living Tisza Association.
13. Fenyo, K. 2001. Hungary struggles to control constantly worsening floods. The Bulletin (Quarterly Magazine of the Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe, Budapest) 10(3).
14. Fokkens, B. 2001. Preface. In Proceedings of the Conference on River Restoration in Europe 2000, pp. 344. Wageningen, the Netherlands, Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment RIZA, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management.
15. Folke, C.; Hahn, T.; Olsson, P. and Norberg, J. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30(1): 441-473.
16. Geels, F.W. and Schot, J. 2007. Typology of socio-technical transition pathways. Research Policy 36(3): 399-417.
17. Gere, C. 2007. The consequences of the Vásárhelyi Plan and reservoir construction for the Szabolcz-Szatmár-Bereg county (in Hungarian). Paper presented at the XXVth National Congress Hungarian Hydrological Society, Tata, Hungary, July 4-5 2007.
18. Glatz, F. 2003. Water use and lifestyle change on the plain (in Hungarian). Jászkunság Almanac. http://epa.oszk.hu/00100/00179/00001/002.html
19. Gramsci, A. 1935. Prison notebooks (1929-1935). Marxist Internet Archive. www.marxists.org/archive/gramsci/prison_notebooks/, permission Quintin Hoare (translation from Italian), Lawrence & Wishart.
20. Hajer, M. 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
21. Hartmann, T. 2010. Reframing polyrational floodplains: Land policy for large areas for temporary emergency retention. Nature and Culture 5(1): in press.
22. Holling, C.S. 2004. From complex regions to complex worlds. Ecology and Society 9(1): 11.
23. Huitema, D. and Meijerink, S. (Eds). 2009. Water policy entrepreneurs: A research companion to water transitions around the globe. Camberley, UK - Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
24. Kajner, P. 2006. From a curse the flood could be made a blessing (in Hungarian). www.elotisza.hu/bovebben.php?id=105
25. Kemp, R.; Schot, J. and Hoogma, R. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10(2): 175-195.
26. Kingdon, J.W. 1995. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: Harper Collins.
27. Kovácz, Á. 2005. Summary of the Audit on the Preparations for the Prevention of Natural Disasters. Budapest, Hungary: State Audit Office of Hungary.
28. KöViM. 2002. The improved Vásárhelyi plan (Concept version) (in Hungarian). Budapest, Hungary: Department of Water Damage Prevention, Ministry of Transport and Water Management (KöViM).
29. Kundzewicz, Z.W. 2002. Non-structural flood protection and sustainability. Water International 27(1): 3-12.
30. Linnerooth-Bayer, J.; Vári, A. and Thompson, M. 2006. Floods and fairness and Hungary. In Verweij, M. and Thompson, M. (Eds), Clumsy solutions for a complex world: Governance, politics and plural perceptions, pp. 181-204. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
31. Litfin, K.T. 1995. Framing science: Precautionary discourse and the ozone treaties. Journal of International Studies 24(2): 251-277.
32. Loorbach, D.A. 2007. Transition management - New mode of governance for sustainable development. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
33. Matczak, P.; Flachner, Z. and Werners, S.E. 2008. Institutions for adapting to climate change in the Tisza river basin. "Klimá 21" Füzetek 55: 87-100.
34. McGuinn, J. 2003. EU funds may favour expensive solutions. The Bulletin (Quarterly Magazine of the Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe) 11(4), http://greenhorizon.rec.org/bulletin/bull114/default.html
35. Molle, F.; Mollinga, P.P. and Wester, P. 2009. Hydraulic bureaucracies and the hydraulic mission: Flows of water, flows of power. Water Alternatives 2(3): 328-349.
36. Olsson, P.; Folke, C. and Hahn, T. 2004. Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: The development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9(4): 2.
37. Olsson, P.; Gunderson, L.H.; Carpenter, S.R.; Ryan, P.; Lebel, L.; Folke, C. and Holling, C.S. 2006. Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11(1): 18.
38. Pérez-Solórzano Borragán, N. 2005. The Europeanisation of interest representation in the new EU member states from ECE. NGOs and business interest associations in comparative perspective. Paper presented at 3rd ECPR Conference, Budapest, 8-10 September 2005.
39. Rhodius, R. 2008. The significance of contextual factors: An investigation into the planning of four retention areas on the German Rhine. Paper presented at Freude am Fluss Closing Conference, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 22-24 October 2008.
40. Roth, D.; Warner, J. and Winnubst, M. 2006. Een noodverband tegen hoog water. Waterkennis, beleid en politiek rond noodoverloopgebieden. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen University and Research Centre.
41. Rotmans, J.; Loorbach, D. and Van der Brugge, R. 2005. Transitiemanagement en duurzame ontwikkeling: Co-evolutionaire sturing in het licht van complexiteit. Beleidswetenschap 19(2): 3-23.
42. Sabatier, P.A. 1988. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences 21(2): 129-168.
43. Schot, J. and Geels, F. 2007. Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change: A critical survey of the literature. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17(5): 605-622.
44. Sendzimir, J.; Balogh, P.; Vári, A. and Lantos, T. 2004. The Tisza river basin: Slow change leads to sudden crisis. In Light, S. (Ed) The role of biodiversity conservation in the transition to rural sustainability, pp. 261-290. NATO Science Series - Sub-series V Science and Technology Policy, Volume 41. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: ISO Press.
45. Smith, A. 2003. Alternative technology niches and sustainable development. Working Paper Series No. 2003/2. Brighton, UK: Science & Technology Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex.
46. Somlyódy, L. (Ed). 2002. The strategic questions of domestic water management. Hungary at the turn of the millennium (in Hungarian). Budapest, Hungary: Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA).
47. Szlávik, L. 2001. Flood protection development in the Tisza Valley (in Hungarian). Paper presented to the Geographical Conference/Földrajzi Konferencia, Szeged, Hungary.
48. Vámosi, S. 2002. The effect of excess waters on the development of the great plain regions (in Hungarian, summary in English). Debrecen: University of Debrecen.
49. Van der Brugge, R. and Rotmans, J. 2007. Towards transition management of European water resources. Water Resources Management 21(1): 249-267.
50. Van der Brugge, R.; Rotmans, J. and Loorbach, D. 2005. The transition in Dutch water management. Regional Environmental Change 5(4): 164-176.
51. Van Hemert, M. 1999. Space for the engineer. River management in the Netherlands in the nineties (in Dutch). K&M: Tijdschrift voor Empirische Filosofie 23(4): 361-387.
52. Váradi, J. 2003. For the blooming of the Tisza Region (in Hungarian). Jászkunság Almanac http://epa.oszk.hu/00100/00179/00001/pdf/02viragzo.pdf
53. Vári, A.; Linnerooth-Bayer, J. and Ferencz, Z. 2003. Stakeholder views on flood risk management in Hungary's Upper Tisza basin. Risk Analysis 23(3): 537-627.
54. Visnovitz, P. 2007. The floods of climate change threaten the dikes. Origo Newspaper, 23 March 2007, 18: 21 Last modification: 23 March 2007, 19: 25.
55. Visnovitz, P. 2008. Protecting 1.5 million people with imaginary giant wash tubs. Origo Newspaper, 11 Sept 2008, 11: 49.
56. VROM (Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment). 2001. Making space, sharing space. Fifth National Policy Document on Spatial Planning 2000/2020. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.
57. Warner, J.F. 2003. Risk regime change and political entrepreneurship: River management in the Netherlands and Bangladesh. In Pelling, M. (Ed) Natural disasters and development in a globalizing world, pp. 185-198. London, UK: Routledge.
58. WaterForum. 2005. Vice-Minster Schultz drops plans for calamity areas (In Dutch). WaterForum Online. www.waterforum.net
59. Werners, S.E.; Flachner, Z.; Matczak, P.; Falaleeva, M. and Leemans, R. 2009. Exploring earth system governance: A case study of floodplain management along the Tisza River in Hungary. Global Environmental Change 19(4): 503-511.
60. Wolters, H.A.; Platteeuw, M. and Schoor, M.M. (Eds). 2001. Guidelines for rehabilitation and management of floodplains; ecology and safety combined. Lelystad, the Netherlands: Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment RIZA.
61. WWF (World Wildlife Fund). 1992. Living rivers (in Dutch). Zeist, the Netherlands: World Wildlife Fund Netherlands.