Giving a direction to port regionalisation

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 46, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1551-1561

  Monios, Jason ^a   Wilmsmeier, Gordon ^a,b  

^a EDINBURGH NAPIER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b United Nations Economic Commission For Latin America and the Caribbean Chile   (Chile)

Author keywords

Hinterland; Inland terminal; Location splitting; Port development; Regionalisation

Indexed keywords

TRANSPORTATION;

DISAGGREGATION; HINTERLAND; INLAND TERMINALS; INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS; PORT DEVELOPMENT; REGIONALISATION; SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT; THEORETICAL APPROACH;

PUBLIC POLICY;

CONTAINER TERMINAL; FIELDWORK; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; NUMERICAL MODEL; PORT DEVELOPMENT; PORT OPERATION; REGIONALIZATION;

EUROPE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84865822156     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Barke M. Transport and Trade; Conceptual Frameworks in Geography 1986, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.
2. Beresford A.K.C., Gardner B.M., Pettit S.J., Naniopoulos A., Wooldridge C.F. The UNCTAD and WORKPORT models of port development: evolution or revolution?. Maritime Policy & Management 2004, 31:93-107.
3. Bichou K., Gray R. A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2005, 39:75-92.
4. Bird J. The Major Seaports of the United Kingdom 1963, Hutchinson & Co, London.
5. Bird J. Seaports and Seaport Terminals 1971, Hutchinson & Co, London.
6. Bergqvist R., Falkemark G., Woxenius J. Establishing intermodal terminals. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research 2010, 3:285-302.
7. Bontekoning Y.M., Macharis C., Trip J.J. Is a new applied transportation research field emerging?--A review of intermodal rail-truck freight transport literature. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2004, 38:1-34.
8. Bryman A. Social Research Methods 2008, Oxford UP, Oxford.
9. Caballini, C., Gattorna, E., 2009. The expansion of the port of Genoa: the Rivalta Scrivia dry port. UNESCAP Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific. No. 78: Development of Dry Ports, New York, United Nations.
10. Callahan R.F., Pisano M., Linder A. Leadership and strategy: a comparison of the outcomes and institutional designs of the Alameda Corridor and the Alameda Corridor East projects. Public Works Management & Policy 2010, 14:263-287.
11. Christopher M. Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Creating value-adding networks 2005, Prentice Hall, London. third ed.
12. Cullinane K.P.B., Wilmsmeier G. The contribution of the dry port concept to the extension of port life cycles. Handbook of Terminal Planning 2011, Springer, New York. J.W. Böse (Ed.).
13. De Langen, P.W., 2008. Ensuring Hinterland Access: The Role of Port Authorities. JTRC OECD/ITF Discussion Paper 2008-11.
14. De Langen P.W., Chouly A. Hinterland access regimes in seaports. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2004, 4:361-380.
15. Ducruet, C., 2005. Spatial structures and trends in port cities: from the local to the global. Mappemonde, 76 (in French). (accessed 15.07.11). http://mappemonde.mgm.fr/num5/articles/art05106.html.
16. Evangelista P., Morvillo A. Maritime transport in the Italian logistic system. Maritime Policy & Management 2000, 27:335-352.
17. Fleming D.K., Hayuth Y. Spatial characteristics of transportation hubs: centrality and intermediacy. Journal of Transport Geography 1994, 2:3-18.
18. Frémont A., Soppé M. Northern European range: shipping line concentration and port hierarchy. Ports, Cities and Global Supply Chains 2007, Ashgate, Aldershot. J. Wang, D. Olivier, T. Notteboom, B. Slack (Eds.).
19. Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research 1967, Aldine, Chicago, IL.
20. Hayuth Y. Containerization and the load center concept. Economic Geography 1981, 57:160-176.
21. Hayuth Y. Globalisation and the port-urban interface: conflicts and opportunities. Port, Cities and Global Supply Chains 2007, Ashgate, Aldershot. J. Wang, D. Olivier, T. Notteboom, B. Slack (Eds.).
22. Heaver T., Meersman H., Moglia F., Van de Voorde E. Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition?. Maritime Policy & Management 2000, 27:363-373.
23. Heaver T., Meersman H., Van de Voorde E. Co-operation and competition in international container transport: strategies for ports. Maritime Policy & Management 2001, 28:293-305.
24. Hoyle B.S. East African seaports: an application of the concept of 'anyport'. Transactions & Papers of the Institute of British Geographers 1968, 44:163-183.
25. Iannone F. Innovation in port-hinterland connections. The case of the Campanian logistic system in Southern Italy. Maritime Economics & Logistics 2012, 14:33-72.
26. Jacobs W. Port competition between Los Angeles and Long Beach: an institutional analysis. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 2007, 98:360-372.
27. Kuipers, B., 2002. The rise and fall of the maritime mainport. In: Paper presented at the European Transport Conference 2002.
28. Markusen A. Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies 2003, 37:701-717.
29. McKinnon A. Integrated logistics strategies. Handbook of Logistics and Supply Chain Management 2001, 157-170. Elsevier Science, London. A. Brewer, K. Button, D. Hensher (Eds.).
30. Moglia F., Sanguineri M. Port planning: the need for a new approach?. Maritime Economics & Logistics 2003, 5:413-425.
31. Monios J. The role of inland terminal development in the hinterland access strategies of Spanish ports. Research in Transportation Economics 2011, 33:59-66.
32. Monios, J., Lambert, B., in press. The Heartland Corridor: using public private partnerships to transform institutional settings. Journal of Transport Geography.
33. Monios J., Lambert B. Intermodal freight corridor development in the United States. Intermodal freight corridor development in the United States. Dry Ports: a Global Perspective 2013, Ashgate, Farnham. R. Bergqvist, G. Wilmsmeier, K.P.B. Cullinane (Eds.).
34. Monios J., Wilmsmeier G. Port-centric logistics, dry ports and offshore logistics hubs: strategies to overcome double peripherality?. Maritime Policy and Management 2012, 39(2):207-226.
35. Ng A.K.Y., Cetin I.B. Locational characteristics of dry ports in developing economies: some lessons from Northern India. Regional Studies 2012, 46(6):757-773.
36. Ng K.Y.A., Gujar G.C. The spatial characteristics of inland transport hubs: evidences from Southern India. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17:346-356.
37. Ng, K.Y.A., Padilha, F., forthcoming. The spatial evolution of dry ports in developing economies: the Brazilian experience. Maritime Economics and Logistics.
38. Notteboom T. Bundling of freight flows and hinterland network developments. The Future of Intermodal Freight Transport 2008, 66-88. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. R. Konings, H. Priemus, P. Nijkamp (Eds.).
39. Notteboom T.E. Complementarity and substitutability among adjacent container ports. Environment & Planning A 2009, 41:743-762.
40. Notteboom T.E., Rodrigue J. Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy & Management 2005, 32:297-313.
41. Notteboom, T.E., Rodrigue, J.-P., 2009. Inland terminals within North American & European Supply Chains. UNESCAP Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific. No. 78: Development of Dry Ports, New York, United Nations.
42. Notteboom T.E., Winklemans W. Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge?. Maritime Policy & Management 2001, 28:71-89.
43. Olivier D., Slack B. Rethinking the port. Environment & Planning A 2006, 38:1409-1427.
44. Proost S., Dunkerley F., De Borger B., Gühneman A., Koskenoja P., Mackie P., Van der Loo S. When are subsidies to trans-European network projects justified?. Transportation Research Part A 2011, 45:161-170.
45. Rimmer P.J. The search for spatial regularities in the development of Australian seaports 1861-1961/2. Geograkiska Annaler 1967, 49:42-54.
46. Rimmer P.J., Comtois C. China's container-related dynamics, 1990-2005. GeoJournal 2009, 74:35-50.
47. Robinson R. Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm. Maritime Policy & Management 2002, 29:241-255.
48. Rodrigue J.-P., Comtois C., Slack B. The Geography of Transport Systems 2009, Routledge, Abingdon. second ed.
49. Rodrigue J.-P., Debrie J., Fremont A., Gouvernal E. Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18:519-529.
50. Rodrigue J.-P., Notteboom T. The terminalisation of supply chains: reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships. Maritime Policy & Management 2009, 36:165-183.
51. Roso V., Woxenius J., Lumsden K. The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17:338-345.
52. Roso V. A review of dry ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics 2010, 12:196-213.
53. Sánchez R.J., Wilmsmeier G. The River Plate Basin - a comparison of port devolution processes on the East Coast of South America. Research in Transportation Economics 2006, 17:185-205.
54. Schaetzl L. Wirtschaftsgeographie 1 - Theorie 1996, UTB, Paderborn. sixth ed.
55. Slack B. Pawns in the game: ports in a global transport system. Growth and Change 1993, 24:579-588.
56. Slack B. The terminalisation of seaports. Port, Cities and Global Supply Chains 2007, Ashgate, Aldershot. J. Wang, D. Olivier, T. Notteboom, B. Slack (Eds.).
57. Slack B., Frémont A. Transformation of port terminal operations: from the local to the global. Transport Reviews 2005, 25:117-130.
58. Taaffe E.J., Morrill R.L., Gould P.R. Transport expansion in underdeveloped countries: a comparative analysis. Geographical Review 1963, 53:503-529.
59. Tsamboulas D., Vrenken H., Lekka A.-M. Assessment of a transport policy potential for intermodal mode shift on a European scale. Transportation Research Part A 2007, 41:715-733.
60. UNCTAD Development and Improvement of Ports: The Principles of Modern Port Management and Organisation 1992, UNCTAD, Geneva.
61. Van den Berg R., de Langen P.W. Hinterland strategies of port authorities: a case study of the Port of Barcelona. Research in Transportation Economics 2011, 33:6-14.
62. Van der Horst M.R., De Langen P.W. Coordination in hinterland transport-chains: a major challenge for the seaport community. Maritime Economics & Logistics 2008, 10:108-129.
63. Van der Horst, M.R., Van der Lugt, L., 2009. Coordination in railway hinterland chains: an institutional analysis. In: Paper presented at the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) conference, Copenhagen, June 2009.
64. Van Klink H.A. The port network as a new stage in port development: the case of Rotterdam. Environment and Planning A 1998, 30:143-160.
65. Veenstra A., Zuidwijk R., Van Asperen E. The extended gate concept for container terminals: expanding the notion of dry ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics 2012, 14:14-32.
66. Wilmsmeier, G., Monios, J., Lambert, B., 2010. Observations on the regulation of " dry ports" by national governments. In: Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), Lisbon, July 2010.
67. Wilmsmeier G., Monios J., Lambert B. The directional development of intermodal freight corridors in relation to inland terminals. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19:1379-1386.
68. Woo S.-H., Pettit S.J., Kwak D.-W., Beresford A.K.C. Seaport research: a structured literature review on methodological issues since the 1980s. Transportation Research Part A 2011, 45:667-685.
69. Yin R. Case Study Research 2009, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.