Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 519-529

  Rodrigue, Jean Paul ^a   Debrie, Jean ^b   Fremont, Antoine ^b   Gouvernal, Elisabeth ^b  

^a HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

Author keywords

Containerization; Europe; Freight distribution; Inland ports (terminals); North America

Indexed keywords

CONTAINER TERMINAL; CONTAINERIZATION; DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; LOGISTICS; PORT OPERATION; SHIPPING; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; WATERWAY TRANSPORT;

EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 77952669930     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Debrie J., Gouvernal E. Intermodal rail in Western Europe: actors and services in a new regulatory environment. Growth and Change 2006, 37(3):444-459.
2. Frémont, A., 2009. Empirical evidence for integration and disintegration of maritime shipping, port and logistics activities. In: Round Table on Vertical Relations between Transport and Logistics Businesses, OECD, International Transport Forum, Joint Transport Research Center, Paris, 5-6 February, 33p. http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/jtrc/DiscussionPapers/DP200901.pdf.
3. Giuliano G., O'Brien T. Extended gate operations at the ports of Los Angles and Long Beach: a preliminary assessment. Maritime Policy and Management 2008, 35(2):215-235.
4. Gouvernal E., Daydou J. Container rail freight services in North-west Europe: diversity of organizational forms in a liberalizing environment. Transport Reviews 2005, 25(5):557-571.
5. Hayuth Y. Inland container terminal function and rationale. Maritime Policy and Management 1980, 7(4):283-289.
6. Hayuth Y. Intermodal transportation and the hinterland concept. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 1982, 73(1):13-21.
7. Leitner, S.J., Harrison, R., 2001. The Identification and Classification and Inland Ports. Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin (Report 0-4083-1).
8. Ng A., Gujar G.C. The spatial characteristics of inland transport hubs: evidences from Southern India. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17(5):346-356.
9. Notteboom T. Complementarity and substitutability among adjacent gateway ports. Environment and Planning A 2009, 41(3):743-762.
10. Notteboom T., Rodrigue J.-P. Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy and Management 2005, 32(3):297-313.
11. Notteboom, T., Rodrigue, J.-P., 2009. Inland terminals within North American and European supply chains. Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific, vol. 78. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, United Nations, pp. 1-57.
12. Notteboom T., Rodrigue J.-P. Foreland-based regionalization: integrating intermediate hubs with port hinterlands. Research in Transportation Economics 2010, 27:19-29.
13. Pettit S.J., Beresford K.C. Port development: from gateways to logistics hubs. Maritime Policy and Management 2009, 36(3):253-268.
14. Rodrigue J.-P., Notteboom T. The terminalization of supply chains: reassessing port-hinterland logistical relationships. Maritime Policy and Management 2009, 36(2):165-183.
15. Roso V., Woxenius J., Lumsden K. The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17(5):338-345.
16. Slack B. Satellite terminals: a local solution to hub congestion?. Journal of Transport Geography 1999, 7:241-246.
17. Van Der Horst M.R., De Langen P.W. Coordination in hinterland transport chains: a major challenge for the seaport community. Journal of Maritime Economics & Logistics 2008, 10:108-129.
18. Verhoeven P. European Ports Policy: meeting contemporary governance challenges. Maritime Policy and Management 2009, 35(1):79-102.
19. Wakeman, T., 2008. Marine Transportation of International Freight for the Northeast Corridor. In: Anticipating 2025 in Northeast Corridor Transportation: Aerial, Highway, Marine, and Rail Technologies & Linkages, Institute of Public Administration, Public Policy Forum, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, pp. 38-59.
20. Walter C.K., Poist R.F. North American inland port development: international vs domestic shipper preferences. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 2004, 34(7):579-597.
21. Wiegmans B., Masurel E., Nijkamp P. Intermodal freight terminals: an analysis of the terminal market. Transportation Planning and Technology 1999, 23:105-128.