Characterising switching behaviour in perceptual multi-stability

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 210, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 79-92

  Denham, Susan ^a   Bendixen, Alexandra ^b   Mill, Robert ^a   Tóth, Dénes ^c   Wennekers, Thomas ^a   Coath, Martin ^a   Bohm, Tamás ^c,e   Szalardy, Orsolya ^c   Winkler, István ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLOGY   (Hungary)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^e BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Auditory streaming; Bi stability; Multi stability; Perceptual organisation; Transition matrix

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY RECEPTOR CELLS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84865783495     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Binocular rivalry 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Alais, Blake R (Eds.).
2. Alais D., Parker A. Independent binocular rivalry processes for motion and form. Neuron 2006, 52:911-920.
3. Alais D., van Boxtel J.J., Parker A., van Ee R. Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry. Vision Res 2010, 50:929-935.
4. Anderson T.W., Goodman L.A. Statistical Inference about Markov Chains. Ann Math Statist 1957, 28(1):89-110.
5. Anstis S., Saida S. Adaptation to auditory streaming of frequency-modulated tones. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1985, 11:257-271.
6. Bejjanki V.R., Beck J.M., Lu Z.L., Pouget A. Perceptual learning as improved probabilistic inference in early sensory areas. Nat Neurosci 2011, 14:642-648.
7. Bendixen A., Denham S.L., Gyimesi K., Winkler I. Regular patterns stabilize auditory streams. J Acoust Soc Am 2010, 128:3658-3666.
8. Blake R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol Rev 1989, 96:145-167.
9. Blake R., Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3:13-21.
10. Borg I., Groenen P.J.F. Modern multidimensional scaling: theory and applications 2005, Springer.
11. Borg I., Staufenbiel T. Theorien und Methoden der Skalierung: eineEinführung 1993, Huber, Bern. 2nd edition.
12. Carter O., Cavanagh P. Onset rivalry: brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e343.
13. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Roy Stat Soc B (Method) 1977, 39:1-38.
14. Denham SL, Gyimesi K, Stefanics G, Winkler I. Perceptual bi-stability in auditory streaming: How much do stimulus features matter? Learning and Perception, in press.
15. Denham S.L., Gyimesi K., Stefanics G., Winkler I. Stability of perceptual organisation in auditory streaming. The neurophysiological bases of auditory perception 2010, 477-488. Springer. E.A. Lopez-Poveda, A.R. Palmer, R. Meddis (Eds.).
16. Denham S.L., Winkler I. The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. J Physiol Paris 2006, 100:154-170.
17. Good I.J. The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 1953, 40:237-264.
18. Horváth J., Czigler I., Sussman E., Winkler I. Simultaneously active pre-attentive representations of local and global rules for sound sequences in the human brain. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2001, 12:131-144.
19. Hupé J.M., Rubin N. The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids. Vision Res 2003, 43:531-548.
20. Jelinek F., Mercer L.R. Interpolated estimation of Markov source parameters from sparse data. Proc. workshop on pattern recognition in practice 1980, E.S. Gelsema, L.N. Kanal (Eds.).
21. Kersten D., Mamassian P., Yuille A. Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu Rev Psychol 2004, 55:271-304.
22. Klink P.C., van Ee R., van Wezel R.J. General validity of Levelt's propositions reveals common computational mechanisms for visual rivalry. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3473.
23. Kondo H.M., Kashino M. Involvement of the thalamocortical loop in the spontaneous switching of percepts in auditory streaming. J Neurosci 2009, 29:12695-12701.
24. Kruskal J.B., Wish M. Multidimensional scaling. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Application in the Social Sciences 1978, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills and London, pp. 7-11.
25. Kullback S. Information theory and statistics 1959, John Wiley and Sons, NY.
26. Lago-Fernández L., Deco G. A model of binocular rivalry based on competition in IT. Neurocomputing 2002, 44-46:503-507.
27. Laing C.R., Chow C.C. A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. J Comput Neurosci 2002, 12:39-53.
28. Lehky S.R. An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception 1988, 17:215-228.
29. Lehky S.R. Binocular rivalry is not chaotic. Proc Biol Sci 1995, 259:71-76.
30. Levelt W.J.M. On binocular rivalry 1968, Mouton, Paris.
31. Mamassian P., Goutcher R. Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. J Vis 2005, 5:361-375.
32. Manning C.D., Schütze H. Foundations of statistical natural language processing 1999, MIT Press.
33. McLachlan G.J., Basford K.E. Mixture models: inference and applications to clustering 1988, Marcel Dekker.
34. Merk I., Schnakenberg J. A stochastic model of multistable visual perception. Biol Cybern 2002, 86:111-116.
35. Moore B.C.J., Gockel H. Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acust Acust 2002, 88:320-333.
36. Moreno-Bote R., Knill D.C., Pouget A Bayesian sampling in visual perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:12491-12496.
37. Moreno-Bote R., Rinzel J., Rubin N. Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. J Neurophysiol 2007, 98:1125-1139.
38. Moreno-Bote R., Shpiro A., Rinzel J., Rubin N. Alternation rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance. J Vis 2010, 10:1-18.
39. Necker L.A. Observations on some remarkable optical phenomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phenomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. Philos Mag J Sci 1832, 1:329-337.
40. Ney H., Essen U., Kneser R. On structuring probabilistic dependencies in stochastic language modeling. Computer Speech and Language 1994, 8:1-38.
41. Pastukhov A., Braun J. Cumulative history quantifies the role of neural adaptation in multistable perception. J Vis 2011, 11.
42. Pastukhov A., Braun J. A short-term memory of multi-stable perception. J Vis 2008, 8(7):1-14.
43. Pouget A., Dayan P., Zemel R.S. Inference and computation with population codes. Annu Rev Neurosci 2003, 26:381-410.
44. Pressnitzer D., Hupe J.M. Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization. Curr Biol 2006, 16:1351-1357.
45. Shank M.D., Walker J.T. Figure-ground organization in real and subjective contours: a new ambiguous figure, some novel measures of ambiguity, and apparent distance across regions of figure and ground. Percept Psychophys 1989, 46:127-138.
46. Shpiro A., Moreno-Bote R., Rubin N., Rinzel J. Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistability. J Comput Neurosci 2009, 27:37-54.
47. Sterzer P., Kleinschmidt A., Rees G. The neural bases of multistable perception. Trends Cogn Sci 2009, 13:310-318.
48. Sundareswara R., Schrater P.R. Perceptual multistability predicted by search model for Bayesian decisions. J Vis 2008, 8(12):1-9.
49. Suzuki S., Grabowecky M. Evidence for perceptual " trapping" and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry. Neuron 2002, 36:143-157.
50. van Ee R. Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry. Vision Res 2005, 45:29-40.
51. van Ee R. Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2009, 26:2612-2622.
52. van Ee R., van Boxtel J.J., Parker A.L., Alais D. Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection. J Neurosci 2009, 29:11641-11649.
53. van Noorden L.P.A.S. Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences 1975, Institute for Perception Research, Eindhoven, Eindhoven.
54. Warren R.M. Illusory changes in repeated words: differences between young adults and the aged. Am J Psychol 1961, 74:506-516.
55. Winkler I., Denham S.L., Nelken I. Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends Cogn Sci 2009, 13:532-540.
56. Winkler I., Takegata R., Sussman E. Event-related brain potentials reveal multiple stages in the perceptual organization of sound. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005, 25:291-299.
57. Winkler I., Denham S.L., Mill R., Bohm T.M., Bendixen A. Multistability in auditory stream segregation: A predictive coding view. Proc. R Soc B Biol Sci 2012, 367(1591):1001-1012.