Time-related survival effects of two gluconasturtiin hydrolysis products on the terrestrial isopod Porcellio scaber

Chemosphere

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1084-1090

  van Ommen Kloeke, A E Elaine ^a   Jager, Tjalling ^a   van Gestel, Cornelis A M ^a   Ellers, Jacintha ^a   van Pomeren, Marinda ^a   Krommenhoek, Thibault ^a   Styrishave, Bjarne ^b   Hansen, Martin ^b   Roelofs, Dick ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

2 Phenylethyl isothiocyanate; 3 Phenylpropionitrile; Ecotoxicology; Gluconasturtiin; Porcellio scaber; Survival

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; HYDROLYSIS;

3-PHENYLPROPIONITRILE; ECO-TOXICOLOGY; GLUCONASTURTIIN; ISOTHIOCYANATES; PORCELLIO SCABER; SURVIVAL;

SOILS;

HYDROCINNAMONITRILE; NITRILE; PHENETHYL ISOTHIOCYANATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

COMMERCIAL SPECIES; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DISSIPATION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; GROWTH; HYDROLYSIS; ISOPOD; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; SOIL ECOSYSTEM; SOIL MICROORGANISM; SOIL POLLUTION; SURVIVAL; TIME DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR; TOXIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOTOXICOLOGY; HYDROLYSIS; LC 50; NONHUMAN; PORCELLIO SCABER; SOIL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL; TOXICODYNAMIC; TOXICOKINETICS; TOXICOLOGY;

PORCELLIO SCABER;

EID: 84865735218     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.074     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ashauer R., Escher B.I. Advantages of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling in aquatic ecotoxicology and risk assessment. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 2010, 12:2056-2061.
2. Bednarek P., Osbourn A. Plant-microbe interactions: chemical diversity in plant defense. Science 2009, 324:746-748.
3. Bending G.D., Lincoln S.D. Inhibition of soil nitrifying bacteria communities and their activities by glucosinolate hydrolysis products. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2000, 32:1261-1269.
4. Bennett J.W., Klich M. Mycotoxins. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2003, 16:497-516.
5. Bones A.M., Rossiter J.T. The enzymic and chemically induced decomposition of glucosinolates. Phytochemistry 2006, 67:1053-1067.
6. Bradford M.A., Jones T.H., Bardgett R.D., Black H.I.J., Boag B., Bonkowski M., Cook R., Eggers T., Gange A.C., Grayston S.J., Kandeler E., McCaig A.E., Newington J.E., Prosser J.I., Setala H., Staddon P.L., Tordoff G.M., Tscherko D., Lawton J.H. Impacts of soil faunal community composition on model grassland ecosystems. Science 2002, 298:615-618.
7. Brinch U.C., Ekelund F., Jacobsen C.S. Method for spiking soil samples with organic compounds. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2002, 68:1808-1816.
8. Brown P.D., Morra M.J. Control of soil-borne plant pests using glucosinolate-containing plants. Advances in Agronomy 1997, 61:167-231.
9. Donkin S.G., Eiteman M.A., Williams P.L. Toxicity of glucosinolates and their enzymatic decomposition products to Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Nematology 1995, 27:258-262.
10. Drobne D. Terrestrial isopods - a good choice for toxicity testing of pollutants in the terrestrial environment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 1997, 16:1159-1164.
11. Fahey J.W., Zalcmann A.T., Talalay P. The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 2001, 56:5-51.
12. Gimsing A.L., Kirkegaard J.A. Glucosinolates and biofumigation: fate of glucosinolates and their hydrolysis products in soil. Phytochemistry Reviews 2009, 8:299-310.
13. Gimsing A.L., Strobel B.W., Hansen H.C.B. Degradation and sorption of 2-propenyl and benzyl isothiocyanate in soil. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2009, 28:1178-1184.
14. Haanstra L., Doelman P., Voshaar J.H.O. The use of sigmoidal dose-response curves in soil ecotoxicological research. Plant and Soil 1985, 84:293-297.
15. Halkier B.A., Gershenzon J. Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2006, 57:303-333.
16. Hattenschwiler S., Tiunov A.V., Scheu S. Biodiversity and litter decomposition interrestrial ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 2005, 36:191-218.
17. Hornung, E., Farkas, S., Fischer, E., 1998. Tests on the Isopod Porcellio scaber, in: H. Løkke, Gestel, C.A.M.V. (Eds.), Handbook of Soil Invertebrate Toxicity Tests John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 207-226.
18. Jager T., Albert C., Preuss T.G., Ashauer R. General unified threshold model of survival - a toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic framework for ecotoxicology. Environmental Science & Technology 2011, 45:2529-2540.
19. Jager T., Crommentuijn T., Van Gestel C.A.M., Kooijman S.A.L.M. Chronic exposure to chlorpyrifos reveals two modes of action in the springtail Folsomia candida. Environmental Pollution 2007, 145:452-458.
20. Jeffery E.H., Araya M. Physiological effects of broccoli consumption. Phytochemistry Reviews 2009, 8:283-298.
21. Jensen J., Styrishave B., Gimsing A.L., Hansen H.C.B. The toxic effects of benzyl glucosinolate and its hydrolysis product, the biofumigant benzyl isothiocyanate, to Folsomia fimetaria. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2010, 29:359-364.
22. Kolar L., Erzen N.K., Hogerwerf L., Van Gestel C.A.M. Toxicity of abamectin and doramectin to soil invertebrates. Environmental Pollution 2008, 151:182-189.
23. Kolar L., Jemec A., Van Gestel C.A.M., Valant J., Hrzenjak R., Erzen N.K., Zidar P. Toxicity of abamectin to the terrestrial isopod Porcellio scaber (Isopoda, Crustacea). Ecotoxicology 2010, 19:917-927.
24. Lazzeri L., Curto G., Leoni O., Dallavalle E. Effects of glucosinolates and their enzymatic hydrolysis products via myrosinase on the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid et White) Chitw. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2004, 52:6703-6707.
25. Meeker W.Q., Escobar L.A. Teaching about approximate confidence-regions based on maximum-likelihood-estimation. American Statistician 1995, 49:48-53.
26. Morant A.V., Jorgensen K., Jorgensen C., Paquette S.M., Sanchez-Perez R., Moller B.L., Bak S. Beta-glucosidases as detonators of plant chemical defense. Phytochemistry 2008, 69:1795-1813.
27. Morra M.J., Kirkegaard J.A. Isothiocyanate release from soil-incorporated Brassica tissues. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2002, 34:1683-1690.
28. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. Biometry the principles and practise of statistics in biological research 1995, W.H. Freeman and company, New York, USA. third ed.
29. Traka M., Mithen R. Glucosinolates, isothiocyanates and human health. Phytochemistry Reviews 2009, 8:269-282.
30. Van Ommen Kloeke A.E.E., van Gestel C.A.M., Styrishave B., Hansen M., Ellers J., Roelofs D. Molecular and life-history effects of a natural toxin on herbivorous and non-target soil arthropods. Ecotoxicology 2012, 21:1084-1093.
31. Wardle D.A. Communities and Ecosystems Linking the Aboveground and Belowground Components 2002, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
32. Wislocki, P.G., Grosso, L.S., Dybas, R.A., 1989. Environmental aspects of abamectin use in crop protection. In: Campbell, W.C. (Ed.), Ivermectinvand abamectin. Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 182-200.
33. Wittstock U., Burow M. Tipping the scales - specifier proteins in glucosinolate hydrolysis. Iubmb Life 2007, 59:744-751.
34. Wittstock U., Burow M. Glucosinolate Breakdown in Arabidopsis: Mechanism, Regulation and Biological Significance, The Arabidopsis Book 8 2010, The American Society of Plant Biologists.
35. Wittstock U., Halkier B.A. Glucosinolate research in the Arabidopsis era. Trends in Plant Science 2002, 7:263-270.
36. Wittstock, U., Kliebenstein, D.J., Lambrix, V., Reichelt, M., Gershenzon, J., John, T.R., 2003. Glucosinolate hydrolysis and its impact on generalist and specialist insect herbivores, Recent Advances in Phytochemistry. Elsevier, pp. 101-125. (Chapter 5).