Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems

Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

Volumn 36, Issue , 2005, Pages 191-218

  Hättenschwiler, Stephan ^a   Tiunov, Alexei V ^b   Scheu, Stefan ^c  

^a CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^b SEVERTSOV INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION   (Russian Federation)

^c DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecosystem functioning; Microorganisms; Nutrient cycling; Soil food web; Soil animal diversity

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLE; DECOMPOSITION; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; LEAF LITTER; MICROORGANISM;

ANIMALIA; FUNGI;

EID: 30344453391     PISSN: 00664162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.112904.151932     Document Type: Review

References (151)

1. Aber JD, Melillo JM, McClaugherty CA. 1990. Predicting long-term patterns of mass loss, nitrogen dynamics, and soil organic matter formation from initial fine litter chemistry in temperate forest ecosystems. Can. J. Bot. 68:2201-8
2. Anderson JM. 1977. The organization of soil animal communities. Ecol. Bull. 25:15-23
3. Anderson JM. 1987. Interactions between invertebrates and microorganisms: noise or necessity for soil processes? In Ecology of Microbial Communities, ed. M Fletcher, TRG Grag, JG Jones, pp. 125-45. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
4. Anderson JM. 1988. Spatiotemporal effects of invertebrates on soil processes. Biol. Fertil. Soils 6:216-27
5. Anderson JM. 1995. Soil organisms as engineers: microsite modulation of macroscale processes. In Linking Species to Ecosystems, ed. CG Jones, JH Lawton, pp. 94-106. New York: Chapman & Hall
6. Anderson JM. 2000. Food web functioning and ecosystem processes: problems and perceptions of scaling. In Invertebrates as Web-masters in Ecosystems, ed. DC Coleman, PF Hendrix, pp. 3-24. Wallingford: CAB Int.
7. Andow DA. 1991. Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36:561-86
8. Andrén O, Bengtsson J, Clarholm M. 1995. Biodiversity and species redundancy among litter decomposers. In The Significance and Regulation of Soil Biodiversity, ed. HP Collins, GP Robertson, MJ Klug, pp. 141-51. Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad.
9. Baar J, Stanton NL. 2000. Ectomycorrhizal fungi challenged by saprotrophic basidiomycetes and soil microfungi under different ammonium regimes in vitro. Mycol. Res. 104:691-97
10. Bardgett RD. 2005. The Biology of Soil: A Community and Ecosystem Approach. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 253 pp.
11. Bardgett RD, Shine A. 1999. Linkages between plant litter diversity, soil microbial biomass and ecosystem function in temperate grasslands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31:317-21
12. Berg B, Berg MP, Bottner P, Box E, Breymeyer A, et al. 1993. Litter mass loss rates in pine forests of Europe and eastern United States: some relationship with climate and litter quality. Biogeochemistry 20:127-59
13. Blair JM, Parmelee RW, Beare MH. 1990. Decay rates, nitrogen fluxes, and decomposer communities of single- and mixed-species foliar litter. Ecology 71:1976-85
14. Bridge P, Spooner B. 2001. Soil fungi: diversity and detection. Plant Soil 232:147-54
15. Briones MJI, Ineson P. 1996. Decomposition of eucalyptus leaves in litter mixtures. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28:1381-88
16. Brown GG. 1995. How do earthworms affect microfloral and faunal community diversity? Plant Soil 170:209-31
17. Brown GG, Barois I, Lavelle P. 2000. Regulation of soil organic matter dynamics and microbial activity in the drilosphere and the role of interactions with other edaphic functional domains. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 36:177-98
18. Cadish G, Giller KE. 1997. Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition. Wallingford: CAB Int. 432 pp.
19. Cairney JWG, Meharg AA. 2002. Interactions between ectomycorrhizal fungi and soil saprotrophs: implications for decomposition of organic matter in soils and degradation of organic pollutants in the rhizosphere. Can. J. Bot. 80:803-9
20. Càrcamo HA, Abe TA, Prescott CE, Holl FB, Chanway CP. 2000. Influence of millipedes on litter decomposition, N mineralization, and microbial communities in a coastal forest in British Columbia, Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 30:817-26
21. Chapin FS III, Zavaleta E, Eviner V, Naylor R, Vitousek PM, et al. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234-42
22. Chapela IH, Osher LJ, Horton TR, Henn MR. 2001. Ectomycorrhizal fungi introduced with exotic pine plantations induce soil carbon depletion. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33:1733-40
23. Chapman K. Whittaker JB, Heal OW. 1988. Metabolic and faunal activity in litters of tree mixtures compared with pure stands. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 24:33-40
24. Coleman DC, Reid CPP, Cole CV. 1983. Biological strategies of nutrient cycling in soil systems. In Advances in Ecological Research, ed. A Macfadyen, ED Ford, pp. 1-55. New York: Academic
25. Colpaert JV, van Laere A. 1996. A comparison of the extracellular enzyme activities of two ectomycorrhizal and a leaf-saprotrophic basidiomycete colonizing beech leaf litter. New Phytol. 134:133-41
26. Conn C, Dighton J. 2000. Litter quality influences on decomposition, ectomycorrhizal community structure and mycorrhizal root surface acid phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32:489-96
27. Cornelissen JHC. 1996. An experimental comparison of leaf decomposition rates in a wide range of temperate plant species and types. J. Ecol. 84:573-82
28. Coûteaux M-M, Bottner P, Berg B. 1995. Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:63-66
29. Cox P, Wilkinson SP, Anderson JM. 2001. Effects of fungal inocula on the decomposition of lignin and structural polysaccharides in Pinus sylvestris litter. Biol. Fertil. Soils 33:246-51
30. Cragg RG, Bardgett RD. 2001. How changes in soil faunal diversity and composition within a trophic group influence decomposition processes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33:2073-81
31. Curl EA, Lartey R, Peterson CM. 1988. Interactions between root pathogens and soil microarthropods. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 24:249-61
32. David J-F, Gillon D. 2002. Annual feeding rate of the millipede Glomeris marginata on holm oak (Quercus ilex) leaf litter under Mediterranean conditions. Pedobiolology 46:42-52
33. Degens BP. 1998. Decreases in microbial functional diversity do not result in corresponding changes in decomposition under different moisture conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30:1989-2000
34. Dejonghe W, Boon N, Seghers D, Top EM, Verstraete W. 2001. Bioaugmentation of soils by increasing microbial richness: missing links. Environ. Microbiol. 3:649-57
35. De Ruiter PC, Moore JC, Zwart KB, Bouwman LA, Hassink J, et al. 1993. Simulation of nitrogen mineralization in the belowground food webs of two winter wheat fields. J. Appl. Ecol. 30:95-106
36. Dobranic JK, Zak JC. 1999. A microtiter plate procedure for evaluating fungal functional diversity. Mycologia 91:756-65
37. Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson T-H. 1980. Compendium of Soil Fungi. Eching, Ger.: IHW-Verlag, 859 pp.
38. Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH. 1981. Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. New York: Random House. 305 pp.
39. Ekblad A, Nordgren A. 2002. Is growth of soil microorganisms in boreal forests limited by carbon or nitrogen availability? Plant Soil 242:115-22
40. Ekschmitt K, Klein A. Pieper B, Wolters V. 2001. Biodiversity and functioning of ecological communities - why is diversity important in some cases and unimportant in others? J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 164:239-46
41. Eviner VT, Chapin FS III. 2003. Functional matrix: a conceptual framework for predicting multiple plant effects on ecosystem processes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:487-515
42. Facelli JM, Pickett STA. 1991. Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot. Rev. 52:1-32
43. Finzi AC, Canham CD. 1998. Non-additive effects of litter mixtures on net N mineralization in a southern New England forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 105:129-36
44. Frey SD, Elliott ET, Paustian K, Peterson GA. 2000. Fungal translocation as a mechanism for soil nitrogen inputs to surface residue decomposition in a no-tillage agroecosystem. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32:689-98
45. Gadgil RL, Gadgil PD. 1975. Supression of litter decomposition by mycorrhizal roots of Pinus radiata. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 5:35-41
46. Gartner TB. Cardon ZG. 2004. Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos 104:230-46
47. Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Bardgett RD. Cook R, Christensen S, et al. 2000. Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship. Oikos 90:279-94
48. Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Wheatley R, Kuan HL, Boag B, et al. 2001. An examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship in arable soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33:1713-22
49. Gustafson FG. 1943. Decomposition of the leaves of some forest trees under field conditions. Plant Phys. 18:704-07
50. Halaj J, Wise DH. 2002. Impact of a detrital subsidy on trophic cascades in a terrestrial grazing food web. Ecology 83:3141-51
51. Hansen RA, Coleman DC. 1998. Litter complexity and composition are determinants of the diversity and species composition of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatidae) in litterbags. Appl. Soil Ecol. 9:17-23
52. Hassall M, Turner JG, Rands MRW. 1987. Effects of terrestrial isopods on the decomposition of different woodland leaf litter. Oecologia 72:597-604
53. Hättenschwiler S. 2005. Effects of tree species diversity on litter quality and decomposition. In Forest Diversity and Function: Temperate and Boreal Systems, ed. M Scherer-Lorenzen, C Körner, E-D Schulze. 176:149-64. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
54. 2, N deposition and different soil types. Global Change Biol. 7:565-79
55. Hättenschwiler S, Gasser P. 2005. Soil animals alter plant litter diversity effects on decomposition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:1519-24
56. Hättenschwiler S, Vitousek PM. 2000. The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:238-43
57. 2 on quality, decomposition and isopod consumption of tree litter. Oikos 85:271-81
58. Hawksworth DL. 2001. The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1.5 million species estimate revisited. Mycol. Res. 105:1422-32
59. Hector A, Beale AJ, Minns A, Otway SJ, Lawton JH. 2000. Consequences of the reduction of plant diversity for litter decomposition: effects through litter quality and microenvironment. Oikos 90:357-71
60. Hedlund K, Sjögren Öhrn M. 2000. Tritrophic interactions in a soil community enhance decomposition rates. Oikos 88:585-91
61. Heemsbergen DA, Berg MP, Loreau M, van Haj JR, Faber JH, Verhoef HA. 2004. Biodiversity effects on soil processes explained by interspecific functional dissimilarity. Science 306:1019-20
62. Hiol FH, Dixon RK, Curl EA. 1994. The feeding preference of mycophagous Collembola varies with the fungal symbiont. 5:99-103
63. Hobbie SE. 1992. Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:336-39
64. Hoorens B, Aerts R, Stroetenga M. 2003. Does initial litter chemistry explain litter mixture effects on decomposition? Oecologia 442:578-86
65. Horwath WR, Paul EA, Harris D, Norton J, Jagger L, Horton KA. 1996. Defining a realistic control for the chloroform fumigation-incubation method using microscopic counting and C-14-substrates. Can. J. Soil Sci. 76:459-67
66. Huhta V, Persson T, Setälä H. 1998. Functional implications of soil fauna diversity in boreal forests. Appl. Soil Ecol. 10:277-88
67. Janzen RA, Dormaar JF, McGill WB. 1995. A community-level concept of controls on decomposition processes-decomposition of barley straw by phanerochaete-chrysosporium or phlebia-radiata in pure or mixed culture. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27:173-79
68. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373-86
69. Kaneko N, Salamanca EF. 1999. Mixed leaf litter effects on decomposition rates and soil microarthropod communities in an oak-pine stand in Japan. Ecol. Res. 14:131-38
70. Klemmedson JO. 1992. Decomposition and nutrient release from mixtures of Gambel oak and ponderosa pine leaf litter. For. Ecol. Manag. 47:349-61
71. Klironomos JN, Kendrick WB. 1995. Stimulative effects of arthropods on endomycorrhizas of sugar maple in the presence of decaying litter. Funct. Ecol. 9:528-36
72. Laakso J, Salminen J, Setälä H. 1995. Effects of abiotic conditions and microarthropod predation on the structure and function of soil animal communities. Acta Zool. Fenn. 196:162-67
73. Laakso J, Setälä H. 1999. Sensitivity of primary production to changes in the architecture of belowground food webs. Oikos 87:57-64
74. Lavelle P, Bignell D, Lepage M, Wolters V, Roger P, et al. 1997. Soil function in a changing world: the role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 33:159-93
75. Leake JR, Donnelly DP, Boddy L. 2002. Interactions between ecto-mycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi. In Mycorrhizal Ecology, ed. MGA Van der Heijden, I Sanders, pp. 345-72. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
76. Lilleskov EA, Hobbie EA, Fahey TJ. 2002. Ectomycorrhizal fungal taxa differing in response to nitrogen deposition also differ in pure culture organic nitrogen use and natural abundance of nitrogen isotopes. New Phytol. 154:219-31
77. Lindahl BO, Taylor AFS, Finlay RD. 2002. Defining nutritional constraints on carbon cycling in boreal forests - towards a less 'phytocentric' perspective. Plant Soil 242:123-35
78. Loreau M. 2001. Micobial diversity, producer-decomposer interactions and ecosystem processes: a theoretical model. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 268:303-9
79. Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime JP, et al. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294:804-8
80. Lussenhop L. 1992. Mechanisms of microarthropod-microbial interactions in soil. Adv. Ecol. Res. 23:1-33
81. Mäder P, Fließbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U. 2002. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:1694-97
82. Maraun M, Alphei J, Bonkowski M, Buryn R, Migge S, et al. 1999. Middens of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris (Lumbricidae): microhabitats for micro- and mesofauna in forest soil. Pedobiologia 43:276-87
83. Maraun M, Migge S, Theenhaus A, Scheu S. 2003. Adding to 'the enigma of soil animal species diversity': fungal feeders and saprophagous soil invertebrates prefer similar food substrates. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 39:85-95
84. Martin TL, Trevors JT, Kaushik NK. 1999. Soil microbial diversity, community structure and denitrification in a temperate riparian zone. Biodiv. Cons. 8:1057-78
85. McTiernan KB, Ineson P, Coward PA. 1997. Respiration and nutrient release from tree leaf litter mixtures. Oikos 78:527-38
86. Meyer MC, Paschke MW, McLendon T, Price D. 1998. Decreases in soil microbial function and functional diversity in response to depleted uranium. J. Environ. Qual. 27:1306-11
87. Mikola J, Setälä H. 1998. Relating species diversity to ecosystem functioning - mechanistic backgrounds and experimental approach with a decomposer food web. Oikos 83:180-94
88. Mikola J, Bardgett RD, Hedlund K. 2002. Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and soil decomposer food webs. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning - Synthesis and Perspectives, ed. M Loreau, S Naeem, P Inchausti, pp. 169-80. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
89. Montagnini F, Ramstad K, Sancho F. 1993. Litterfall, litter decomposition and the use of mulch of four indigenous tree species in the Atlantic lowlands of Costa Rica. Agrofor. Syst. 23:39-61
90. Nicolardot B, Recous S, Mary B. 2001. Simulation of C and N mineralisation during crop residue decomposition: a simple dynamic model based on the C:N ratio of the residues. Plant Soil 228:83-103
91. Nilsson M-C. 1994. Separation of allelopathy and resource competition by the boreal dwarf shrub Empetrum hermaphroditum Hagerup. Oecologia 98:1-7
92. Nilsson M-C, Wardle DA, Dahlberg A. 1999. Effects of plant litter species composition and diversity on the boreal forest plant-soil system. Oikos 86:16-26
93. Olsson PA, Jakobsen I, Wallander H. 2002. Foraging and resource allocation strategies of mycorrhizal fungi in a patchy environment. In Mycorrhizal Ecology, ed. MGA Van der Heijden, I Sanders, pp. 93-115. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
94. Parkinson D, Visser S, Whittaker JB. 1979. Effects of collembolan grazing on fungal colonization of leaf litter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 11:529-35
95. Parton WJ, Schimel DS, Ojima DS, Cole DV. 1994. A general model for soil organic matter dynamics. In Sensitivity to Litter Chemistry, Texture and Management - Quantitative Modeling of Soil Forming Processes, ed. RB Bryant, RW Arnold, pp. 137-67. Madison, WI: Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
96. Perez-Harguindeguy N, Diaz S, Cornelissen JHC, Venramini F, Cabido M, Castellanos A. 2000. Chemistry and toughness predict leaf litter decomposition rates over a wide spectrum of functional types and taxa in central Argentina. Plant Soil 218:21-30
97. Petersen H. 2002. General aspects of collembolan ecology at the turn of the millenium. Pedobiologia 46:246-60
98. Ponsard S, Arditi R. 2000. What can stable isotopes (delta N-15 and delta C-13) tell about the food web of soil macro-invertebrates? Ecology 81:852-64
99. Prescott CE, Zabek LM, Staley CE, Kabzerns R. 2000. Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of litter type, forest type, and litter mixtures. Can. J. For. Res. 30:1742-50
100. Priemé A, Braker G, Tiedje JM. 2002. Diversity of nitrate reductase (nirK and nirS) gene fragments in forest upland and wetland soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:1893-900
101. Prosser JI. 2002. Molecular and functional diversity in soil micro-organisms. Plant Soil 244:9-17
102. Pussard M, Alabouvette C, Levrat P. 1994. Protozoa interactions with soil microflora and possibilities for biocontrol of plant pathogens. In Soil Protozoa, ed. JF Darbyshire, pp. 123-46. Wallingford: CAB Int.
103. Reichle DE, McBrager JF, Ausums S. 1975. Ecological energetics of decomposer invertebrates in a deciduous forest and total respiration budget. In Progress in Soil Zoology, Proc. 5th Int. Soil Zool. Coll., ed. J Vanek, 283-91. Prague: Academia Prague
104. Riechert SE, Bishop S. 1990. Prey control by an assemblage of generalist predators: spiders in garden test systems. Ecology 71:1441-50
105. Ritz K. 1995. Growth responses of some soil fungi to spatially heterogeneous nutrients. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 16:269-79
106. Robinson CH, Dighton J, Frankland JC, Coward PA. 1993. Nutrient and carbon dioxide release by interacting species of straw-decomposing fungi. Plant Soil 151:139-42
107. Roy J. 2001. How does biodiversity control primary productivity? In Global Terrestrial Productivity, ed. J Roy, B Saugier, HA Mooney, pp. 169-86. San Diego: Academic
108. Ruess L, Garcia Zapata EJ, Dighton J. 2000. Food preferences of a fungal-feeding Aphelenchoides species. Nematology 2:223-30
109. Salamanca EF, Kaneko N, Katagiri S. 1998. Effects of leaf litter mixtures on the decomposition of Quercus serrata and Pinus densiflora using field and laboratory microcosm methods. Ecol. Engineer. 10:53-73
110. Salonius PO. 1981. Metabolic capabilities of forest soil microbial populations with reduced species diversity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 13:1-10
111. Schaefer M. 1991. Ecosystem processes: Secondary production and decomposition. In Temperate Deciduous Forests. Ecosystems of the World, ed. E Röhrig, B Ulrich, 7:175-218. Amsterdam: Elsevier
112. Scheu S. 1987. Microbial activity and nutrient dynamics in earthworm casts. Lumbricidae. Biol. Fert. Soils 5:230-34
113. Scheu S. 2001. Plants and generalist predators as links between the belowground and aboveground system. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2:3-13
114. Scheu S, Falca M. 2000. The soil food web of two beech forests (Fagus sylvatica) of contrasting humus type: stable isotope analysis of a macro- and a mesofauna-dominated community. Oecologia 123:285-96
115. Scheu S, Setälä H. 2002. Multitrophic interactions in decomposer communities. In Multitrophic Level Interactions, ed. T Tscharntke. BA Hawkins, pp. 223-64. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
116. Scheu S, Schlitt N, Tiunov AV, Newington JE, Jones TH. 2002. Effects of the presence and community composition of earthworms on microbial community functioning. Oecologia 133:254-60
117. Schimel JP, Firestone MK. 1989. Nitrogen incorporation and flow through a coniferous forest profile. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:779-84
118. Schimel JP, Cates RG, Ruess R. 1998. The role of balsam poplar secondary chemicals in controlling soil nutrient dynamics through succession in the Alaskan taiga. Biogeochemistry 42:221-34
119. Schläpfer F, Schmid B. 1999. Ecosystem effects of biodiversity - a classification of hypotheses and cross-system exploration of empirical results. Ecol. Appl. 9:893-912
120. Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK, Rehill BJ, Hart SC, Lindroth RL, et al. 2004. Genetically based trait in dominant tree affects ecosystem processes. Ecol. Lett. 7:127-34
121. Seastedt TR. 1984. The role of arthropods in decomposition and mineralization processes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29:25-46
122. Setälä H. 1995. Growth of birch and pine seedlings in relation to grazing by soil fauna on ectomycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 76:1844-51
123. Setälä H. 2002. Sensitivity of ecosystem functioning to changes in trophic structure, functional group composition and species diversity in belowground food webs. Ecol. Res. 17:207-1 5
124. Setälä H, McLean MA. 2004. Decomposition rate of organic substrates in relation to the species diversity of soil saprophytic fungi. Oecologia 139:98-107
125. Settle WH, Ariawan H, Astuti ET, Cahyana W, Hakim AL, et al. 1996. Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology 77:1975-88
126. Shaw C, Pawluk S. 1986. Faecel microbiology of Octolasion tyrtaeum, Aporrectodea turgida and Lumbricus terrestris and its relation to the carbon budgets of three artificial soils. Peuobiologia 29:377-89
127. Shaw PJA. 1985. Grazing preferences of Onychiurus armatus (Insecta: Collembola) for mycorrhizal and saprophytic fungi of pine plantations. In Ecological Interactions in Soil, ed. AH Fitter, D Atkinson, DJ Read, MB Usher, pp. 333-37. Oxford: Blackwell
128. Shaw PJA. 1992. Fungi, fungivores, and fungal food webs. In The Fungal Community, ed. GC Carroll, DT Wicklow. pp. 295-310. New York: Marcel Dekker
129. Staaf H. 1980. Influence of chemical composition, addition of raspberry leaves, and nitrogen supply on decomposition rate and dynamics of nitrogen and phosphorus in beech leaf litter. Oikos 35:55-62
130. Staaf H. 1988. Litter decomposition in beech forests: Effect of excluding tree roots. Biol. Fertil. Soils 6:302-5
131. Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM. 1979. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press. 509 pp.
132. Sulkava P, Huhta V. 1998. Habitat patchiness affects decomposition and faunal diversity: a microcosm experiment on forest floor. Oecologia 116:390-96
133. Symondson WOC, Glen DM, Erickson ML, Liddell JE, Langdon CJ. 2000. Do earthworms help to sustain the slug predator Pterostichus melanarius (Coleoptera: Carabidae) within crops? Investigations using monoclonal antibodies. Mol. Ecol. 9:1279-92
134. Tanesaka E, Masuda H, Kinugawa K. 1993. Wood degrading ability of basidiomycetes that are wood decomposers, litter decomposers, or mycorrhizal symbionts. Mycologia 85:347-54
135. Thomas WA. 1968. Decomposition of loblolly pine needles with and without addition of dogwood leaves. Ecology 49:568-71
136. Tinnov AV, Scheu S. 2005a. Facilitative interactions rather than resource partitioning drive diversity-functioning relationships in laboratory fungal communities. Ecol. Lett. 8:618-25
137. Tiunov AV, Scheu S. 2005b. Arbuscular mycorrhiza and Collembola interact in affecting community composition of saprotrophic microfungi. Oecalogia 142:636-42
138. Torsvik V, Goksoyr J, Daae FL, Sorheim R, Michalsen J, Solte K. 1994. Use of DNA analysis to determine the diversity of microbial communities. In Beyond the Biomass, ed. K Ritz, J Dighton, KE Giller, pp. 39-48. New York: John Wiley & Sons
139. Van der Putten WH, Vet LEM, Harvey JA, Wäckers FL. 2001. Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens, and their antagonists. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:547-54
140. Verhoef HA, Brussaard L. 1990. Decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in natural and agroecosystems: the contribution of soil animals. Biogeochemistry 11:175-212
141. Waid JS. 1999. Does soil biodiversity depend upon metabiotic activity and influences? Appl. Soil Ecol. 13:151-58
142. Wardle DA. 2002. Communities and Ecosystems: Linking the Aboveground and Belowground Components. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. 392 pp.
143. Wardle DA, van der Putten WH. 2002. Biodiversity ecosystem functioning and above-ground-below-ground linkages. In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning - Synthesis and Perspectives, ed. M Loreau, S Naeem, P Inchausti, pp. 155-68. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
144. Wardle DA, Bonner KI, Nicholson KS. 1997. Biodiversity and plant litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos 79:247-58
145. Wardle DA, Nilsson M-C, Zackrisson O, Gallet C. 2003. Determinants of litter mixing effects in a Swedish boreal forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35:827-35
146. Watt AD. 1992. Insect pest population dynamics: Effects of tree species diversity. In The Ecology of Mixed-Species Stands of Trees, ed. MGR Cannell, DC Malcolm, PA Robertson, pp. 267-75. Oxford: Blackwell
147. Widmer F, Shaffer BT, Porteous LA, Seidler RJ. 1999. Analysis of nifH gene pool complexity in soil and litter at a Douglas fir forest site in Oregon cascade mountain range. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:374-80
148. Wilson EO. 1992. The Diversity of Life. New York: WW Norton. 424 pp.
149. Wolters V. 1991. Soil invertebrates: Effects on nutrient turnover and soil structure - a review. Z. Pflanzenern. Bodenk. 154:389-402
150. Xiong SJ, Nilsson C. 1999. The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta-analysis. J. Ecol. 87:984-94
151. Zimmer M, Topp W. 2000. Species-specific utilization of food sources by sympatric woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscidea). J. Anim. Ecol. 69:1071-82