Complete anonymity compromises the accuracy of self-reports

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1291-1299

  Lelkes, Yphtach ^d   Krosnick, Jon A ^a   Marx, David M ^b   Judd, Charles M ^c   Park, Bernadette ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Accountability; Anonymity; Response bias; Satisficing; Social Desirability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865627016     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Backor K., Golde S., Nie N. Estimating survey fatigue in time use study. Paper presented at the 2007 International Association for Time Use Research Conference, Washington, D.C 2007.
2. Booth-Kewley S., Edwards J.E., Rosenfeld P. Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: Does the computer make a difference?. Journal of Applied Psychology 1992, 77:562-566.
3. Bradburn N.M., Sudman S., Blair E., Stocking C. Question threat and response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly 1978, 42:221-234.
4. Caraballo R.S., Giovino G.A., Pechacek T.F., Mowery P.D. Factors associated with discrepancies between self-reports on cigarette smoking and measured serum cotinene levels among persons aged 17 or older. American Journal of Epidemiology 2001, 153:807-814.
5. Clausen A.R. Response validity: Vote report. Public Opinion Quarterly 1968, 32:588-606.
6. Colton D., Covert R.W. Designing and constructing instruments for social research and evaluation 2007, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
7. Crowne D.P., Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology 1960, 24:349-354.
8. Droitcour J., Caspar R.A., Hubbard M.L., Parsley T.L., Visscher W., Ezzati T.M. The item count technique as a method of indirect questioning: A review of its development and a case study application. Measurement errors in surveys 1991, 185-210. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. P.P. Biemer, R.M. Groves, L.E. Lyberg, N.A. Mathiowetz, S. Sudman (Eds.).
9. Evans A.N., Rooney B. Methods in psychological research 2008, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
10. Fox J.A., Tracy P.E. Randomized response: A method for sensitive surveys 1986, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
11. Gaydos C.A., Howell M.R., Pare B., Clark K.L., Ellis D.A., Hendrix R.M., et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female military recruits. The New England Journal of Medicine 1998, 339:739-744.
12. Gordon R.A. Social desirability bias: A demonstration and technique for its reduction. Teaching of Psychology 1987, 14(1):40-42.
13. Gordon R.A., Stuecher U. The effect of anonymity and increased accountability on the linguistic complexity of teaching evaluations. Journal of Psychology 1992, 126:639-649.
14. Harmon T., Turner C.F., Rogers S.M., Eggleston E., Roman A.M., Villarroel M.A., et al. Impact of T-ACASI on survey measurements of subjective phenomena. Public Opinion Quarterly 2009, 73:255-280.
15. Herzog A.R., Bachman J.G. Effects of questionnaire length on response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly 1981, 45:549-559.
16. Hessing D.J., Elffers H., Weigel R.H. Exploring the limits of self-reports and reasoned action: An investigation of the psychology of tax evasion behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 54:405-413.
17. Himmelfarb S., Lickteig C. Social desirability and the randomized response technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 43:710-717.
18. Holbrook A.L., Krosnick J.A. Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: Tests using the item count technique. Public Opinion Quarterly 2010, 74:37-67.
19. Holbrook A.L., Krosnick J.A., Moore D., Tourangeau R. Response order effects in dichotomous categorical questions presented orally. Public Opinion Quarterly 2007, 71:325-348.
20. Johnson W.R., Sieveking N.A., Clanton E.S. Effects of alternative positioning of open-ended questions in multiple-choice questionnaires. Journal of Applied Psychology 1974, 6:776-778.
21. Jones E., Sigall H. The Bogus Pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin 1971, 76:349-364.
22. Kraut A.I., Wolfson A.D., Rothenberg A. Some effects of position on opinion survey items. Journal of Applied Psychology 1975, 60:774-776.
23. Krosnick J.A. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1991, 5:213-236.
24. Krosnick J.A. Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology 1999, 50:537-567.
25. Lautenschlager G.J., Flaherty F.L. Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability?. Journal of Applied Psychology 1990, 75:310-314.
26. Lensvelt-Mulders G.J., Hox J.J., Van Der Heijden P.G., Maas C.J. Meta-analysis of randomized response research: Thirty-five years of validation. Sociological Methods & Research 2005, 33:319-348.
27. Lerner J.S., Tetlock P.E. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin 1999, 125:255-275.
28. Meier D.E., Emmons C.A., Wallenstein S., Quill T., Morrison R.S., Cassel C.K. A national survey of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine 1998, 338:1193-1201.
29. Mitchell M., Jolley J. Research design explained 2010, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Belmont.
30. Muhlenfeld H.U. Differences between "talking about" and "admitting" sensitive behaviour in anonymous and non-anonymous web-based interviews. Computers in Human Behavior 2005, 21:993-1003.
31. Olson M.A., Fazio R.H., Hermann A.D. Reporting tendencies underlie discrepancies between implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem. Psychological Science 2007, 18:287-291.
32. Ong A.D., Weiss D.J. The impact of anonymity on responses to sensitive questions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2000, 30:1691-1708.
33. Patrick D.L., Cheadle A., Thompson D.C., Diehr P., Koepsell T., Kinne S. The validity of self-reported smoking: A review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health 1994, 84:1086-1093.
34. Paulhus D.L. Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984, 46:598-609.
35. Perkins H.W., Berkowitz A.D. Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. Substance Use & Misuse 1986, 21:961-976.
36. Price K.H. Decision responsibility, task responsibility, identifiability, and social loafing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1987, 40:330-345.
37. Reicher S.D., Levine M. On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology 1994, 24:511-524.
38. Reicher S.D., Levine M. Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology 1994, 33:145-163.
39. Schopler J., Insko C.A., Drigotas S.M., Wieselquist J., Pemberton M.B., Cox C. The role of identifiability in the reduction of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1995, 31:553-574.
40. Traugott M.W., Katosh J.P. Response validity in surveys of voting behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly 1979, 43:359-377.
41. Turnley W.H., Feldman D.C. Re-examining the effects of psychological contract violations: Unmet expectations and job dissatisfaction as mediators. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2000, 21:25-42.
42. Warner S.L. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1965, 60:63-69.
43. Williams K., Harkins S., Latane B. Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981, 40:303-311.
44. Yeager D.S., Krosnick J.A. The validity of self-reported nicotine product use in the 2001-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Medical Care 2010, 48:1128-1132.
45. Zimbardo P.G. The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska symposium on motivation 1969, 237-307. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. W.J. Arnold, D. Levine (Eds.).