The impact of anonymity on responses to sensitive questions

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 1691-1708

  Ong, Anthony D ^b   Weiss, David J ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Los Angeles ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034238451     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02462.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. American Psychological Association. (1996). Rules and procedures: June 1, 1996. American Psychologist, 51, 529-548.
2. Armacost, R. L., Hosseini, J. C., Morris, S. A., & Rehbein, K. A. (1991). An empirical comparison of direct questioning, scenario, and random response methods for obtaining sensitive business information. Decision Sciences, 22, 1073-1090.
3. Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3-26.
4. Baumeister, R. F., Hutton, D. G., & Tice, D. M. (1989). Cognitive processes during deliberate self-presentation: How self-presenters alter and misinterpret the behavior of their interaction partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 59-78.
5. Becker, G., & Bakal, D. (1970). Subject anonymity and motivational distortion in self-report data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 207-209.
6. Begin, G., Boivin, M., & Bellerose, J. (1979). Sensitive data collection through the random response technique: Some improvements. Journal of Psychology, 101, 53-65.
7. Boruch, R. F., & Cecil, J. S. (1979). Assuring the confidentiality of social research data. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8. Bradburn, N. M., & Sudman, S. (1979). Improving interview method and questionnaire design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9. Bradburn, N., Sudman, S., Blair, E., & Stocking, C. (1978). Question threat and response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 221-234.
10. Brink, T. L. (1995). Sexual behavior and telling the truth on questionnaires. Psychological Reports, 76, 218.
11. Campbell, M. J., & Waters, W. E. (1990). Does anonymity increase response rate in postal questionnaire surveys about sensitive subjects? A randomized trial. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 44, 75-76.
12. Catania, J. A., Binson, D., Canchola, J., Pollack, L. M., Hauck, W., & Coates, T. J. (1996). Effects of interviewer gender, interviewer choice, and item wording on responses to questions concerning sexual behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 345-375.
13. Catania, J., Chitwood, D. D., Gibson, D. R., & Coates, T. J. (1990). Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 339-362.
14. Churchill, G. F. (1987). Marketing research (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: Dryden.
15. Clark, J. P., & Tifft, L. L. (1966). Polygraph and interview validation of self-reported deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 31, 516-523.
16. DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203-243.
17. Esposito, J. L., Agard, E., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Can confidentiality of data pay off? Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 477-480.
18. Fidler, D. S., & Kleinknecht, R. E. (1977). Random responding versus direct questioning: Two data-collection methods for sensitive information. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1045-1049.
19. Fowler, F. J., Jr. (1985). Survey research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. Fuller, C. (1974). Effect of anonymity on return rate and response bias in a mail survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 292-296.
21. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor Books.
22. Hill, P. C., Dill, C. A., & Davenport, E. C. (1988). A reexamination of the bogus pipeline. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 587-601.
23. Hyman, H. (1944). Do they tell the truth? Public Opinion Quarterly, 8, 557-559.
24. Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol 1. pp. 231-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. King, F. W. (1970). Anonymous versus identifiable questionnaires in drug usage surveys. American Psychologist, 25, 982-985.
26. Klein, K., & Cheuvront, B. (1990). The subject-experimenter contract: A reexamination of subject pool contamination. Teaching of Psychology, 17, 166-169.
27. Lee, R. M., & Renzetti, C. M. (1990). The problem of researching sensitive topics. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 510-528.
28. Levin, I. P., Schnittjer, S. K., & Thee, S. L. (1988). Information framing effects in social and personal decision. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 520-529.
29. Linden, L. E., & Weiss, D. J. (1994). An empirical assessment of the random response method of sensitive data collection. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 823-836.
30. Locander, W., Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. (1976). An investigation of interview method, threat and response distortion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71, 269-275.
31. McCabe, D. L., & Bowers, W. J. (1994). Academic dishonesty among males in college: A 30-year perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 5-10.
32. Nation, J. R. (1997). Research methods. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
33. Patterson, M. L. (1991). Functions of nonverbal behavior in interpersonal interaction. In R. S. Feldman & B. Rime (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 458-495). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Person, E. S., Terestman, N., Myers, W. A., Goldberg, E. L., & Salvador, C. (1989). Gender differences in sexual behaviors and fantasies in a college population. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 15, 187-198.
35. Schlenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F. (1990). Self-consciousness and self-presentation: Being autonomous versus appearing autonomous. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 820-828.
36. Singer, E., Hippler, H., & Schwarz, N. (1992). Confidentiality assurances in surveys: Reassurance or threat? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4, 256-268.
37. Singer, E., Von Thurn, D. R., & Miller, E. R. (1995). Confidentiality assurances and response: A quantitative review of the experimental literature. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 66-77.
38. Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. (1974). Response effects in surveys: A review and synthesis. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
39. Teigen, K. H. (1998, November). A good chance is not a number: Determinants and implications of verbal probabilistic terms. Paper presented at the meeting of the Judgment/Decision Making Society, Dallas, TX.
40. Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 275-304.
41. Turner, C. F., Ku, L., Rogers, S. M., Lindberg, L. D., Pleck, J. H., & Sonenstein, F. L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867-873.
42. Warner, S. (1965). Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 63-69.
43. Werch, C. E. (1990). Two procedures to reduce response bias in reports of alcohol consumption. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 51, 327-330.