Video Quality Assessment

The Essential Guide to Video Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 417-436

  Seshadrinathan, Kalpana ^a   Bovik, Alan C ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882913490     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374456-2.00013-X     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Wang Z., Bovik A.C. Modern Image Quality Assessment 2006, Morgan and Claypool Publishing Co., New York.
2. Liu J.Y.L.V.M., Wang K.G. Objective image quality measure for block-based DCT coding. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron 1997, 43:511-516.
3. Sheikh H.R., Bovik A.C., Cormack L. No-reference quality assessment using natural scene statistics: JPEG2000. Image Process. IEEE Trans 2005, 14(11):1918-1927.
4. Wang Z., Bovik A.C., Evans B.L. Blind measurement of blocking artifacts in images. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process 2000, 3:981-984.
5. Tan K.T., Ghanbari M. Frequency domain measurement of blockiness in MPEG-2 coded video. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process 2000, 3:977-980.
6. Bovik A.C., Liu S. DCT-domain blind measurement of blocking artifacts in DCT-coded images. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process 2001, 3:1725-1728.
7. Liu S., Bovik A.C. Efficient DCT-domain blind measurement and reduction of blocking artifacts. IEEE Trans. Image Process 2002, 12:1139-1149.
8. Pinson M.H., Wolf S. A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality. IEEE Trans. Broadcast 2004, 50(3):312-322.
9. Geisler W.S., Banks M.S. Visual performance. Handbook of Optics 1995, McGraw-Hill, New York. M. Bass (Ed.).
10. Wandell B.A. Foundations of Vision 1995, Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.
11. Cormack L.K. Computational models of early human vision. The handbook of image and video processing 2005, 325-346. Elsevier, New York. A.C. Bovik (Ed.).
12. van Den C.J., Lambrecht Branden, Verscheure O. Perceptual quality measure using a spatiotemporal model of the human visualsystem. Proc. SPIE March 1996, Vol. 2668(1):450-461.
13. Winkler S. Perceptual distortion metric for digital color video. Proc. SPIE 1999, 3644(1):175-184.
14. Fredericksen R.E., Hess R.F. Temporal detection in human vision: dependence on stimulus energy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (Opt. Image Sci. Vis.) 1997, 14(10):2557-2569.
15. Lubin J. The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance. Digital Images and Human Vision 1993, 163-178. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. A.B. Watson (Ed.).
16. Watson A.B., Hu J., McGowan J.F. Digital video quality metric based on human vision. J. Electron. Imaging 2001, 10(1):20-29.
17. Masry M., Hemami S.S., Sermadevi Y. A scalable wavelet-based video distortion metric and applications. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. IEEE Trans 2006, 16(2):260-273.
18. Lubin J. A human vision system model for objective picture quality measurements. IEEE Int. Broadcast. Conv. 1997, 498-503.
19. Tektronix. [Online] Available:. http://www.tek.com/products/video_test/pqa500/.
20. AccepTV. [Online] Available:. http://www.acceptv.com/.
21. Carnec M., Le Callet P., Barba D. Objective quality assessment of color images based on a generic perceptual reduced reference. Image Communication 2008, 23(4):239-256.
22. ITU-T Rec. J. 247. Objective perceptual multimedia video quality measurement in the presence of a full reference. International Telecommunications Union Std. 2008.
23. Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of multimedia quality assessment, Phase I. 2008. Available:. http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/vqeg/projects/multimedia/.
24. NTT News Release 2008, NTT, Available:. http://www.ntt.co.jp/news/news08e/0808/080825a.html.
25. Opticom. [Online] Available:. http://www.opticom.de/technology/pevq_video-quality-testing.html.
26. Malkowski M., Claben D. Performance of video telephony services in UMTS using live measurements and network emulation. Wirel. Pers. Commun 2008, 1:19-32.
27. Barkowsky M., Bialkowski J., Bitto R., Kaup A. Temporal registration using 3D phase correlation and a maximum likelihood approach in the perceptual evaluation of video quality. IEEE Workshop Multimed. Signal Process October 2007, 1-3:195-198.
28. Hekstra A.P., Beerends J.G., Ledermann D., de Caluwe F.E., Kohler S., Koenen R.H., Rihs S., Ehrsam M., Schlauss D. PVQM - A perceptual video quality measure. Signal Proc. Image Commun 2002, 17:781-798.
29. ITU-T Rec. J. 144. Objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for digital cable television in the presence of a full reference. International Telecommunications Union Std. 2004.
30. Final VQEG report on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment 2003, The Video Quality Experts Group, Available:. http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/vqeg/projects/frtv_phaseII.
31. Huber P.J. Robust Statistics 1981, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
32. Yuen M., Wu H.R. A survey of hybrid MC/DPCM/DCT video coding distortions. Signal Process 1998, 70(3):247-278.
33. Movshon J.A., Newsome W.T. Visual response properties of striate cortical neurons projecting to Area MT in macaque monkeys. J. Neurosci 1996, 16(23):7733-7741.
34. Born R.T., Bradley D.C. Structure and function of visual area MT. Annu. Rev. Neurosci 2005, 28:157-189.
35. Wang Z., Lu L., Bovik A.C. Video quality assessment based on structural distortion measurement. Signal Process. Image Commun 2004, 19(2):121-132.
36. Wang Z., Li Q. Video quality assessment using a statistical model of human visual speed perception. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis 2007, 24(12):B61-B69.
37. K. Seshadrinathan and A. C. Bovik. Spatio-temporal quality assessment of natural videos. IEEE Trans. Image Process. submitted for publication.
38. Seshadrinathan K., Bovik A.C. A structural similarity metric for video based on motion models. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech Signal Process 2007, 1:869-872.
39. Seshadrinathan K. Video quality assessment based on motion models. Ph.D. dissertation 2008, University of Texas, Austin, at.
40. Fleet D.J., Jepson A.D. Computation of component image velocity from local phase information. Int. J. Comput. Vis 1990, 5(1):77-104.
41. Daugman J.G. Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (Opt. Image Sci.) 1985, 2(7):1160-1169.
42. Heeger D.J. Optical flow using spatiotemporal filters. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1987, 1(4):279-302.
43. Adelson E.H., Bergen J.R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1985, 2(2):284-299.
44. Priebe N.J., Lisberger S.G., Movshon J.A. Tuning for spatiotemporal frequency and speed in directionally selective neurons of macaque striate cortex. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26(11):2941-2950.
45. Simoncelli E.P., Heeger D.J. A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT. Vis. Res 1998, 38(5):743-761.
46. Seshadrinathan K., Bovik A.C. Unifying analysis of full reference image quality assessment. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process 2008.
47. Watson A.B., Ahumada J., A.J. Model of human visual-motion sensing. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (Opt. Image Sci.) 1985, 2(2):322-342.
48. Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective quality metrics for video quality assessment 2000, The Video Quality Experts Group, Available:. http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/vqeg/projects/frtv_phaseI.
49. LIVE image quality assessment database. 2003. Available:. http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality/subjective.htm.
50. Moorthy A., Bovik A.C. Visual importance pooling for image quality assessment. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. Special Issue Visual Media Quality Assessment 2008, 3(2):193-201.